Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The many-tentacled Rupert Murdoch phone-hacking scandal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 09:23 PM
Original message
The many-tentacled Rupert Murdoch phone-hacking scandal
from the Guardian UK:




Sir Gus O'Donnell, the cabinet secretary, blocked an attempt by Gordon Brown before the general election to hold a judicial inquiry into allegations that the News of the World had hacked into the phones of cabinet ministers and other high-profile figures.

As News International prepares to pay compensation to victims of the illegal practice, the Guardian understands that Britain's most senior civil servant took steps to prevent an inquiry on the grounds that it would be too sensitive before last year's general election.

The then prime minister, who warned Peter Mandelson in 2009 that his phone had been hacked on behalf of the News of the World, wanted a judicial inquiry after new evidence of the illegal practice emerged that summer.

The Guardian revealed in July 2009 that Rupert Murdoch's News Group newspapers had paid more than £1m to settle legal cases that threatened to reveal illegal phone hacking by private investigators on behalf of News of the World. ..........(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/apr/10/gordon-brown-hacking-inquiry-civil-service



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
crickets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-11 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. "Britain's most senior civil servant took steps to prevent an inquiry on the grounds
that it would be too sensitive before last year's general election."

This sounds so familiar. Doesn't this sound familiar?

I was initially impressed by the description of Charlotte Harris, who seemed to be digging for the truth on behalf of her clients...

How are we meant to know what to accept {for settlement} if we don't know the full extent of what has happened?

Oh. Never mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-11 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. k/r n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC