Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Transparency Funds on the Chopping Block

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-11 08:37 AM
Original message
Transparency Funds on the Chopping Block
http://www.citizensforethics.org/blog/entry/transparency-funds-on-the-chopping-block

With transparency programs facing virtual elimination from proposed budget cuts – The Sunlight Foundation’s so-called "Budget Technopocalypse" – there is good cause to be concerned about what, if any, transparency legacy the Obama administration will leave behind. While CREW agrees with Sunlight that transparency efforts merit ongoing funding, we question the utility of some of the information the government has posted on-line. Some data – particularly related to government spending – is clearly important, but a quick perusal of www.data.gov reveals other information that can hardly be considered “high value.”

The underlying problem, however, is more than just a debate over the quality of data currently on-line. The vulnerability to budget cuts highlights a major limitation of the administration’s transparency efforts: they are not backed up by legislative changes. The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) remains one of the most effective tools for the public to access government information, something the president recognized in his day-one memo mandating disclosure under that statute. But rather than proposing changes to the FOIA, the administration has relied on precatory policies that are ignored with impunity.

Just last week, Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) chief FOIA officer admitted in testimony before the House Oversight Committee that DHS has a systemic and long-term problem with overusing FOIA’s Exemption 5. This has continued despite Attorney General Eric Holder’s March 2010 FOIA memo identifying Exemption 5 as an area where discretionary releases are most appropriate. CREW’s experience suggests DHS is not alone and that despite the president’s and attorney general’s pleas for more discretionary releases, many agencies continue to withhold to avoid embarrassment or worse.

The squabble over the $32 million proposed cuts in the e-government funds also highlights an even larger problem: Congress’ refusal to consider budget cuts where they can make the most difference. The money saved by cutting transparency funding is insignificant in light of the depth of our fiscal crisis. Without cutting defense and entitlement spending and/or raising taxes, it is impossible to significantly impact the budget and return the nation to fiscal health.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-11 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. Kick and rec for transparency.

:kick:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-11 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. This has nothing to do with Obama
I posted about this last week and no one cared. http://election.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x826214

But now that you blame Obama, I'm sure this will be very popular.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC