kpete
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-11-11 12:03 PM
Original message |
oops, i did it again...Liberal Hypocrisy |
Dawgs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-11-11 12:08 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Which liberals are happy with Obama and war? |
gratuitous
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-11-11 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. Well, I can't say for sure if they're liberals or not |
|
But there are any number of folks posting right here at DU who think the policies of the Obama administration, including foreign policy and conduct of the ongoing occupations of other countries are just fine and dandy. I don't advise asking them for the reasons for their support, however.
|
JoeyT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-11-11 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
9. The "reasons" usually turn out to be along the lines of |
|
"I TRUST HIM WHY DON'T YOU?!"
|
patrice
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-11-11 12:09 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Just because the differences are not apparent does not mean that there are none. |
|
Believe me, I am a skeptic too, but my allegiance to truth compels me to cite the logical inconsistencies of this meta-category of opposition.
That said, it is also true that though there may be differences that are not apparent, it is also not apparent, from our perspective at this time, whether those differences are essentially significant.
|
Myrina
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-11-11 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
"That said, it is also true that though there may be differences that are not apparent, it is also not apparent, from our perspective at this time, whether those differences are essentially significant"
That sounds like a sentence Palin might come up with ...
|
patrice
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-11-11 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. People around here talk like they know everything they need to know in order to arrive at whatever |
|
Edited on Mon Apr-11-11 12:53 PM by patrice
conclusion they are pedaling to the rest of us. They do not.
However . . .
Even if they did know everything they would need to know in order to decide __________________ , that does not mean that missing information, whatever it is, is necessarily significant to the outcome of the issue.
|
patrice
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-11-11 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. "That sounds like . . ." Could that have anything to do with you? ... even in the slightest degree? |
|
When I think something like that about what someone is saying, I check my own deficiencies, first, before making accusations of others.
|
patrice
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-11-11 12:13 PM
Response to Original message |
3. This category of criticism is the same as saying, "Tom looks like Joe. He is the same height, same |
|
Edited on Mon Apr-11-11 12:15 PM by patrice
color of hair, same color of eyes, weighs about the same, is about the same age, dresses in the same style, likes the same sports, has similar hobbies, ergo Tom IS Joe."
|
mrcheerful
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-11-11 12:21 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Ahhhhh Obama didn't lie us into invading a country by using fear and revenge speak |
|
nor did Obama declare mission accomplished when it wasn't. Nor did Obama come up with more lies to cover the fact that Saddam nor Iraq was involved with 9/11. Obama did not declare that, after 9/11 failure, Libya had WMD's and was ready to deploy them on US cities. Nor did Obama then declare that, after no WMD's were found in Iraq, he was going to give Libya American style freedom, you know Iraqis are now free to decide their destiny and those who don't agree with my ideal of freedom are terrorists so they have to die, after all we are fighting them over there so we aren't fighting them here.
Funny how wing nuts can't remember any of those things when they try to compare D presidents to R presidents on policies.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:18 AM
Response to Original message |