Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WI Election...If it goes to the Supreme Court w/ Prosser...does he have to recuse himself?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Snoutport Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-11 02:55 PM
Original message
WI Election...If it goes to the Supreme Court w/ Prosser...does he have to recuse himself?
What if all of this goes to the Supreme Court? If Prosser steps aside for the case it is a split court. If he stayed on...well...he wouldn't do that would he?

What is the next step if the case is split?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-11 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. no
Has he made any statements about the case?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buddysmellgood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-11 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. He would have to recuse as would Gableman who campaigned actively for Prosser.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imajika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-11 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. What case?
Why are people assuming there is a "case"?

The votes from Brookfield either exist or they don't, correct?

They will finish the canvass and recount the votes, if the recount matches the certified totals that is pretty much it.

Do people want to exclude Brookfield voters or something?

There is going to be a recount and we will know if the certified totals are correct once it is done, until then I think it is ridiculous to claim voter/election fraud or suggest that there is a "case".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-11 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. A tally on a computer is not the same as physical paper ballots that can be touched and recounted.
So either the actual ballots exist or they don't. If there is no paper trail to back up that tally, then it's just numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imajika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-11 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. But there IS a paper trail..
And Brookfield's votes WERE reported to the media on election night.

http://brookfield-wi.patch.com/articles/brookfield-gives-prosser-nearly-11k-votes

Due to gross negligence or utter incompetence, Nickolaus did not include these votes in the overall totals originally reported out - but the votes DO exist. Brookfield residents DID vote and there is a record of those votes and a paper trail.

It will not be hard to recount everything and double check, and my understanding is there IS a paper trail in Wisconsin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-11 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Wisconsin law requires a paper trail and a tally on a computer means nothing without the paper trail
to back it up. That's the whole point of having a paper trail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imajika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-11 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Yes, and we have a paper trail to go check...
So we verify the vote totals from Brookfield and elsewhere. If those totals are what are being reported in the final canvass, then there isn't much more that can be done.

You can't exclude Brookfield because some incompetent county clerk didn't included that city's totals in to the originally reported count.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-11 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Hey, when there are lawyers involved, there's a case.
I'd be surprised if it doesn't end up in court one way or another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-11 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. Pretty sure I read that he has the OPTION to recuse himself
- how dumb is that?? I'll dig and see if I can find it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snoutport Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-11 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Wouldn't that just take the cake if he somehow got to judge his own election
And if there is a way, I'd guess they would try to ram it through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC