sasha031
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-12-11 09:18 AM
Original message |
Looking at the budget cuts/ Richard Nixon would be considered far left in todays climate |
inna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-12-11 09:22 AM
Response to Original message |
1. ...where the center is being falsely re-defined by so called public servants |
|
as being somewhere between right and extreme right (to paraphrase today's Krugman).
|
cali
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-12-11 09:25 AM
Response to Original message |
2. no he wouldn't. not by any sane definition. |
|
he was a racist pig warmonger.
|
sasha031
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-12-11 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. I am not saying he wasn't a racist warmonger |
|
he did create the Endangered Species Act, EPA, Equal Rights Amendment.
You are missing the point. What I'm saying the dialog and policies have moved so far to the right, that the middle no longer exists.
|
Siouxmealso
(89 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-12-11 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
championed wage and price controls as a way to combat inflation. Even though no one then offered much opposition to his idea, the republican party today would shout "socialist!" if anyone proposed such a thing.
|
madrchsod
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-12-11 10:46 AM
Response to Original message |
4. nixon was to right of a liberal republican. |
|
he was`t as extreme as the majority of the republicans of today.
ike would be considered as a democrat today
|
sasha031
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-12-11 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. Ike would be a liberal Democrat, |
FLPanhandle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-12-11 12:46 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Nixon as a person was an asshole |
|
As a politican he wasn't considered far right even back then. You can make a case that he was about as liberal as Clinton was.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:36 AM
Response to Original message |