Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Right to Work: The Law that Brings You Falling Wages, 80-Hour Weeks

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 09:57 AM
Original message
Right to Work: The Law that Brings You Falling Wages, 80-Hour Weeks
http://www.labornotes.org/blogs/2011/04/right-work-law-brings-you-falling-wages-and-80-hour-weeks

Twelve state legislatures are seeking to pass right-to-work bills, which allow workers to get the benefits of union representation without joining or contributing. That weakens the union’s ability to advocate, eventually hurting the whole workforce—including those who thought they could get a free ride.

Right to work came to Louisiana in 1976 and drastically changed my family’s work for the worse. I am a third-generation member of the Operating Engineers, Local 406 in Lake Charles. My grandfather, great-uncle, father, brother, cousins, and I have all worked in the heavy equipment industry. While previous generations ran a wide range of equipment (dozers, draglines, and cranes), my father, brother, and I have only worked with large, heavy-lift cranes.

My grandfather landed on Omaha Beach in the 1944 D-Day invasion and operated cranes that rebuilt the bridges across the major rivers of Western Europe. After returning from the war, he continued as a union Operating Engineer for the next 40 years. On my grandfather’s income from a mostly regular 40-hour work week, he and my grandmother were able to raise a family and take yearly vacations.

I am not trying to paint a rosy picture of my grandfather’s work. This was before the days of air-conditioned crane cabs and computerized safety systems. The folks who ran equipment in the 1950s through the 1970s could expect to work hard and return home dirty.

More at the link --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. 'Right to Work' is one reason I opposed Clinton's nomination
He was not a friend of labor. But worse, he was an enemy of working people.
There's a reason corporatists use their media to stain unions. And it harms 99% of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. "Right to work" indeed!
Another title to an act that has the opposite effect...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
P. Galore Donating Member (95 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
4. Virginia has been a Right to Work state for a long time. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. welcome to DU! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
5. I hate that these sort of laws are called "right-to-work"
when they have absolutely NOTHING to do with ensuring a person's "right-to-work" (who was the Luntzian genius who came up with the idea of calling them these, anyway?). I would, however, eagerly support real "right-to-work" laws that actually ensure that all people whom are are able and willing can always find a job earning a truly livable wage and benefits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Projectionists
To the extent that there's a case for it at all, it's projectionists. In NY you can't be a projectionist without joining the union. You get no training in the union. you get no certification. You simply pay a guy (if he agrees to take you on -- good luck with that); it's literally nothing but a false labor shortage. The problem with corruption in organized labor is that it gives neanderthals rhetorical cover to pass crap like "right to work" laws.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. What is the pay for a projectionist?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. in a right to work state, probably minimum wage
I know that's what I was paid when doing that job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. It was more back in the days of reels
It's hard to convince a movie theater manager to pay you more for pressing a button, unfortunately. Some of the mega-google-ultra-plexes (outside of New York) don't even have projectionists now; the content is delivered digitally and managed remotely. But in New York you still have a guy sitting there making sure it's happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. uhh, this WAS back in the day of reels
and it was minimum wage back then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. That sucks
And, yeah, 'right to work' depresses wages everywhere, sadly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Not great
Payscale.com says 35K in NY which is twice the median nationally. I'm not saying that projectionists don't deserve union protection; I'm saying the union should do more than prevent people from being projectionists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GKirk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
14. Is your grandpa around to ask?
Edited on Tue Apr-12-11 02:57 PM by GKirk
because the union stories I hear, about the 60s at least, include a lot of overtime.
And overtime was something that was wanted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC