Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Island tax havens ...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 10:08 AM
Original message
Island tax havens ...
Yes, they are legal but will they haunt Romney?



Island tax havens factor into Romney's business success
Offshore dealings like those of the Republican presidential candidate trouble many, but they're legal.

- While in private business, Mitt Romney utilized shell companies in two offshore tax havens to help eligible investors avoid paying U.S. taxes, federal and state records show.

Romney gained no personal tax benefit from the legal operations in Bermuda and the Cayman Islands. But aides to the Republican presidential hopeful and former colleagues acknowledged that the tax-friendly jurisdictions helped attract billions of additional investment dollars to Romney's former company, Bain Capital, and thus boosted profits for Romney and his partners.

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-na-mittoffshore17dec17,0,3457481.story?page=1


------------

Romney Founded Business That Utilized Offshore Tax Havens, Costing Taxpayers Billions In Lost Revenue

~snip~

Offshore tax havens are legal and often result in financial windfalls for businesses, CEOs, and investors. But they’re harmful for American taxpayers. The U.S. Public Interest Research Group estimates that the U.S. government loses$100 billion a year in tax revenue due to these tax havens. Because American businesses and taxpayers have to make up the lost revenue, the costs trickle down, costing individual taxpayers an estimated $500 annually.

http://thinkprogress.org/2011/04/12/mitt-romney-tax-havens/

---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. K & R, golden trickle down, always costs and piss in one's boots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Wasn't there a Democratic provision in last year's...

...proposed unemployment extension that would have ended these offshore havens?
Didn't the Repukes block it?

----
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Whatever it was, and I do not recall, it was lame and apparently failed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC