Change Happens
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-12-11 01:23 PM
Original message |
A mistake found in the Ryan budget leading to FAR LESS deficit reductions than originally thought!!! |
|
This is via Chris Hayes tweet - Really damning: http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3458It was a $200 billion error!
|
OHdem10
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-12-11 01:27 PM
Response to Original message |
1. WAPO by the second day had found errors and so had NYT. |
|
It did not add up and increased the deficit.
|
midnight
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-12-11 01:27 PM
Response to Original message |
zbdent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-12-11 01:27 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Oh, please ... you're expecting the "liberally-biased media" to |
|
actually read the report they've been touting as "courageous" ... let alone report on how f*cked up it really is???
Loading the pig into the catapult now ...
|
IggleDoer
(601 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-12-11 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
8. It was courageous of Ryan ... |
|
... to put out crap as if it was a serious attempt to solve our problems.
|
Poboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-12-11 01:27 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Chris Hayes is excellent. |
Scuba
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-12-11 01:45 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Yeah, but it's a math error, and math is a science, so it's not valid anyway.... |
|
...only a leftist whackjob would argue otherwise.
|
Change Happens
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-12-11 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
gratuitous
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-12-11 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
17. Yeah, Ryan doesn't use your socialist mathematics available to everyone |
|
He has his own personal arithmetic that he uses. If you truly want to understand his plan, you have to pay him a royalty for using Paul Ryan Math®.
|
Kadie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-12-11 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
n2doc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-12-11 01:48 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Far bigger errors than this |
|
Starting with the expectation that unemployment will go down below 3% and that the tax cuts will increase revenue.
|
rufus dog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-12-11 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
15. and the assumption that a Realty boom equal to the one of the last |
|
decade will be needed to make the assumptions work.
It is pure friggen fiction.
|
mrcheerful
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-12-11 01:50 PM
Response to Original message |
Rage for Order
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-12-11 01:59 PM
Response to Original message |
9. You mean besides projecting it out over 10 years? |
|
Edited on Tue Apr-12-11 02:00 PM by Rage for Order
Anyone who does that is automatically not serious. Budgets are debated and approved on an annual basis (unless they choose to do continuing resolutinos). Anyone who claims their budget will remain unchanged for 10 years is lying.
|
anarch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-12-11 02:01 PM
Response to Original message |
10. but...but...MORE TAX CUTS FOR THE RICH!!! and NO EPA OVERSITE OF INDUSTRY!!! |
|
it will create jobs, dammit, can't you hippies understand the simplest concepts!
|
Fuzz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-12-11 02:02 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Much more than 200 billion if you look at it, it's in the trillions. |
Viking12
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-12-11 02:02 PM
Response to Original message |
12. but, but, but Paul Ryan is so courageous for even bringing this up |
|
Edited on Tue Apr-12-11 02:02 PM by Viking12
|
Change Happens
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-12-11 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
Viking12
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-12-11 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
21. I think the word you're looking for is fit |
|
seems that every report includes the tidbit about his workout routine...no actual analysis of his plan, but plenty of information on exercise habits
:puke:
|
Change Happens
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-12-11 02:16 PM
Response to Original message |
16. Just read some more at the bottom of the article: he takes credit as in count as credit for savings |
|
as a result of the draw down in Iraq and Afghanistan President Obama already announced!!!
|
librechik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-12-11 02:49 PM
Response to Original message |
18. It was not intended to be a factual budget n/t |
Historic NY
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-12-11 02:55 PM
Response to Original message |
19. Republican mathematics usually means your getting screwed |
|
Edited on Tue Apr-12-11 02:55 PM by Historic NY
|
BobbyBoring
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-12-11 03:00 PM
Response to Original message |
20. And they accuse Obama of "Wealth Redistribution"? |
|
These assholes never fail when it comes to screwing us!
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:54 PM
Response to Original message |