Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A mistake found in the Ryan budget leading to FAR LESS deficit reductions than originally thought!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Change Happens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 01:23 PM
Original message
A mistake found in the Ryan budget leading to FAR LESS deficit reductions than originally thought!!!
This is via Chris Hayes tweet - Really damning:

http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3458


It was a $200 billion error!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. WAPO by the second day had found errors and so had NYT.
It did not add up and increased the deficit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. Oh, please ... you're expecting the "liberally-biased media" to
actually read the report they've been touting as "courageous" ... let alone report on how f*cked up it really is???

Loading the pig into the catapult now ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IggleDoer Donating Member (601 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. It was courageous of Ryan ...
... to put out crap as if it was a serious attempt to solve our problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. Chris Hayes is excellent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yeah, but it's a math error, and math is a science, so it's not valid anyway....
...only a leftist whackjob would argue otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Change Happens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. ROFL....
A good point!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. Yeah, Ryan doesn't use your socialist mathematics available to everyone
He has his own personal arithmetic that he uses. If you truly want to understand his plan, you have to pay him a royalty for using Paul Ryan Math®.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kadie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
22. LOL
:rofl:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. Far bigger errors than this
Starting with the expectation that unemployment will go down below 3% and that the tax cuts will increase revenue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rufus dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. and the assumption that a Realty boom equal to the one of the last
decade will be needed to make the assumptions work.

It is pure friggen fiction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrcheerful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. No kidding?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rage for Order Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
9. You mean besides projecting it out over 10 years?
Edited on Tue Apr-12-11 02:00 PM by Rage for Order
Anyone who does that is automatically not serious. Budgets are debated and approved on an annual basis (unless they choose to do continuing resolutinos). Anyone who claims their budget will remain unchanged for 10 years is lying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. but...but...MORE TAX CUTS FOR THE RICH!!! and NO EPA OVERSITE OF INDUSTRY!!!
it will create jobs, dammit, can't you hippies understand the simplest concepts!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
11. Much more than 200 billion if you look at it, it's in the trillions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viking12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
12. but, but, but Paul Ryan is so courageous for even bringing this up
Edited on Tue Apr-12-11 02:02 PM by Viking12
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Change Happens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. And Cute?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viking12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. I think the word you're looking for is fit
seems that every report includes the tidbit about his workout routine...no actual analysis of his plan, but plenty of information on exercise habits

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Change Happens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
16. Just read some more at the bottom of the article: he takes credit as in count as credit for savings
as a result of the draw down in Iraq and Afghanistan President Obama already announced!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
18. It was not intended to be a factual budget n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
19. Republican mathematics usually means your getting screwed
Edited on Tue Apr-12-11 02:55 PM by Historic NY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobbyBoring Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
20. And they accuse Obama of "Wealth Redistribution"?
These assholes never fail when it comes to screwing us!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC