Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Graham Vows To 'Tie Senate In Knots' Over $50K Left Out Of Budget Deal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 08:56 AM
Original message
Graham Vows To 'Tie Senate In Knots' Over $50K Left Out Of Budget Deal
A Republican U.S. senator says he'll shut down the Senate because the budget deal in which Republicans demanded and got billions of dollars in spending cuts wipes out $50,000 -- that's right $50K -- for his home state.

Not all Republicans were celebrating Monday about the fine print of the $38.5 billion in cuts House Republicans managed to wrangle in last week's 11th-hour budget showdown. Tea Party loyalists who wanted tens of billions more cut from this year's spending were shaking their heads, and at least one senator was lamenting a budget omission he said would hit his state's economy hard.

In fact, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) was down right incensed over the decision not to include a mere $50,000 for an Army Corps of Engineers study on deepening the Port of Charleston in his home state and vowed to "tie the Senate in knots" by holding up Obama administration nominations.

Graham started a string of angry tweets about the omission early Monday. By the end of the day, he had held a press conference on the issue in Charleston, S.C., and was blaming the Obama administration for failing to include the funding in its budget proposal released in February, arguing that 260,000 jobs are tied to the port.

"Obama Admin made a bad mistake not putting money for CHS port in their budget proposal," he wrote.

"No nominations go forward in Senate until we address CHS port," he tweeted, noting that the provision was not an earmark and applied to a dozen ports across the U.S.

<snip>

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/04/graham-vows-to-tie-senate-in-knots-over-50k-left-out-of-budget-deal.php?ref=fpblg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. 260,000 jobs are dependent on $50,000 in funding?
Doesn't sound right to me.

The hypocrisy is amazing though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoCubsGo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Supposedly...
...this study will determine that there will be a need to expand the Port of Charleston, and THAT will be the 260,000 jobs he speaks of. Of course, what he doesn't tell anyone is that the expansion will cost hundreds of millions of federal dollars down the road.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Nice exclusion.
Guess he hasn't realized we are broke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. you'd almost think if it was that important
that the city of Charleston would pony up the $50,000 itself. Or maybe even the State of SC. Heck, I was almost thinking Graham could pay for it himself, but he's only worth between $400,000 and $1.7 million.

But $50,000 seems kinda cheap for a big study, so maybe other groups are already kicking in a share. I think our own water department kicked in something like $10,000 to a $500,000 study of Missouri river degradation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. Sounds like non-union jobs. - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. It's absurd that this is even possible
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. The silence from the Tea Party is deafening.
They just don't want cuts from federal spending. They have specific programs and democratic office holders in their crosshairs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
4. But didn't the teaparty demand an end to earmarks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #4
16. That's only DEMOCRATIC earmarks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoCubsGo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
5. Go right ahead and do that, you little asshole.
Keep giving the country even more examples of what a bunch of hypocrites your party are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
6. What a baby
What does holding up nominations have to do with dredging ports??

Perhaps he is afraid he may end up one day in front of a judge for his anti-American attitude
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viking12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
10. "We MUST cut spending!"
'Unless that spending affects my district, of course."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
12. He's playing to the home crowd.
He's been censured twice for not being conservative enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
13. I want my "earmark"....stomp stomp
He threatens to continue doing what the Senate has been doing since 2006. What a threat....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
14. Why can't he get the money from the state of SC or the city of Charleston?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
15. Lindsey Graham being a hypocrite about earmarks
Edited on Wed Apr-13-11 10:24 AM by Renew Deal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
17. Lindsey is tweeting his tantrum?
How mature. :eyes:

Take a time-out Lindsey. Suck your thumb if it helps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
18. He is DESPERATE to not get tea-bagged out of the Senate!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
19. 260,000 jobs? Collect twenty five cents from each one

Next?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC