I wasn’t around age-wise to witness the demise of Father COUGHLIN (radicalized political-Catholicism) or McCARTHYISM (hey, Wisconsin lives again, and he was an INTIMATE courtier of the KENNEDYs, dated two of the sisters, godfather to Kathleen, Old Joe loved him), but heard about it all and thought that it was History and therefore we were safe from that, it was SO over. Wrong. The KKK was supposedly over, but I saw some actual ones in little parades into the ‘60s. But I do remember John Bircherism and saw it die off and felt safe and that we were enlightened and beyond that crap (again). Wrong. Then came LIMBAUGH, who single-handedly rehabilitated Wingnutism into a form of respectability, and on his coattails were the scores of media yakkers of his ilk, including the revival of radicalized political-Catholicism (Pat and Bay BUCHANAN, HANNITY, O’LOOFAH, and the scores of others), with that zeal for orthodoxy and inquisition and crusade and dictating social choices to others. But not content with relatively respectable “Conservatism,” the wingnuts reverted to loosing their Birch fringers again: the Skinheads, the Minutemen, and the TeaBaggers. All of the bad old days are young again. They never really disappeared, just went underground for a couple of decades. And racism is a key component in all forms of wingnutism.
In dismay, I wondered, how do you fight rhetorical phantasms, vague platitudes: “We LOVE the Constitution. We LOVE Freedom.” The implication being that ONLY THEY love the Constitution and Freedom. Repying with, “SO do I” takes everything to the Neverland field of non-combat.
But something has gnawed at my reason and b.s. detector with every one of their platitudes: What doesn’t FIT here? They SAY they love “the Constitution” and “Freedom” but why are there so many things --- meaning, “people” –--- that they, not only are against, but seem to abhor?
And I have finally hit on my answer: They love “the Constitution” ONLY FOR THEMSELVES. They love “Freedom” only for themselves. All their yapping platitudes about "the Constitution" and "freedom" and all, really mean: "ONLY FOR ME." They don't APPROVE of the Constitutional exercises and freedoms that others, especially those alien-looking others, choose to exercise in their own ways.
Somebody else here at the discussion board just posted the same thing (I'll look up/credit the DUer. On Edit, it was "Volaris" in this thread
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x881168 ) :
*********QUOTE*************
The current Conservative mantra is: Only if it works in my favor. States' Rights? Only if it works in my favor. ACTUAL Libertarianism? Only if it works in my (political) favor. Universal Healthcare? Only if it works in (MY State's) favor. ---see Massachusetts--- Electoral Fraud Inquires? Only if it works in my favor. TAX LAW Most definitely Only if it works in my favor. A Pro-active Congress (as it relates to Executive Oversight) Only if it works in my favor. The Imperial Presidency it will ONLY ever work in my favor
**********UNQUOTE************