Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Head Pentagon Lawyer Compared 19th Century Native American Resistance to Al-Qaeda

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 01:57 PM
Original message
Head Pentagon Lawyer Compared 19th Century Native American Resistance to Al-Qaeda
Head Pentagon Lawyer Compared 19th Century Native American Resistance to Al-Qaeda

Leaders of the Seminole Indians have demanded a personal apology from President Barack Obama after military lawyers involved in tribunals for Guantánamo detainees compared the actions of the Florida tribe’s ancestors to al-Qaeda.

In 1818, General Andrew Jackson led a U.S. military invasion of Florida, then controlled by Spain, to stop black slaves from escaping into the territory. Jackson wound up putting on trial (and executing) two British merchants, Robert Ambrister and Alexander Arbuthnot, for aiding the Seminoles, who resisted the American incursion. That military tribunal eventually became the legal source for authorizing the 21st century Guantánamo war court to try suspected terrorists.

In a legal brief filed in support of the conviction of Ali Hamza al Bahlul, who served as media secretary to Osama bin Laden, Defense Department General Counsel Jeh C. Johnson wrote: “Not only was the Seminole belligerency unlawful, but, much like modern-day al Qaeda, the very way in which the Seminoles waged war against U.S. targets itself violate the customs and usages of war.”

Seminole Chairman Mitchell Cypress, who accused the military lawyers of a “backward dive into racist, revisionist history,” wrote to Obama and Secretary of Defense Robert Gates demanding personal apologies for Johnson’s analogy. So far only Johnson has publicly apologized for his words.

http://www.allgov.com/Controversies/ViewNews/Head_Pentagon_Lawyer_Compared_19th_Century_Native_American_Resistance_to_Al_Qaeda_110413
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. And does that idiot remember what we DID to the Seminoles?
Would he appreciate a comparison to the Bataan Death March?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Err... we haven't been angels in the middle east, either
AQ didn't pick our name out of a hat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nebenaube Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. and a Cherokee/Choctaw agrees... (with the Seminole)
Edited on Wed Apr-13-11 02:06 PM by nebenaube
scalp taking was a deterrent...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. And this American of English-Irish and Scottish descent
agrees with the Seminoles. What our ancestors did to the Native Americans was despicable. I have always been a proponent for the rights of Native Americans. At least, some of the tribes are becoming rich from the gambling casinos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. He already apologized--Last Thursday.
Edited on Wed Apr-13-11 02:13 PM by msanthrope
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. He's got that just turned around - they were the people of the land
Edited on Wed Apr-13-11 02:44 PM by jwirr
and the army was Al-Quada. But then they still believe in manifest destiny so what can we expect. I read the so called apology. Screw them and all their little idiot followers. There were war crimes committed in the wars with the Native Americans and it should not be denied. I hope the tribunal that is trying this case has a very good understanding of history because if this is used as an argument then the defendants should be found not guilty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. From a tactical view he has a point, doesn't he? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC