Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WI School Board Punishes Teachers Who Called In Sick During Protests

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 07:13 PM
Original message
WI School Board Punishes Teachers Who Called In Sick During Protests
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/04/wi-school-board-punishes-teachers-who-called-in-sick-during-protests.php?ref=fpi

Tuesday night, the Hudson, Wisconsin Board of Education announced punishments for teachers who called in sick on February 18, forcing their schools to close, at the height of the protests over Gov. Scott Walker's anti-union measure.

According to The Hudson Star-Observer Board president Barb VanLoenen read a resolution, which passed unanimously, announcing unpaid suspensions of up to 15 days. All the teachers will receive letters of reprimand and a warning will be added to their personnel files. The longer suspensions were issued to teachers "who encouraged colleagues to call in sick and who conducted or discussed union business or talked to the media on district property."

Deputy Superintendent Nancy Sweet said more details about the number of teachers in each category and what the district's investigation uncovered would be available at a later time.

(end snip)

What vindictive asswipes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good news! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. What's good about it?
Do you hate teachers? Hate unions? :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-11 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. I hate people that call in sick
when they're not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-11 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. This was a strike
are you against them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pintobean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-11 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. It wasn't a strike.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-11 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. well, in a way it seemed so - maybe not officially
but I am no expert on this at all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-11 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. It was a "sick out". That is rather like a strike, no?
too late to edit my other post...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-11 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #10
23. Walker's bill, if passed, would prohibit future strikes of the same kind.
So what were they supposed to do?

Democratic senators flee Wisconsin, teachers strike for second day in a row
February 18, 2011
Ballot News

With respect to state law, legal issues are surfacing with this week’s “sick out.” Wisconsin law prohibits teacher strikes, however, many argue for the legality of the protest, claiming it is not directed at an employer, disqualifying it as a strike.

John Matthews, the Madison Teachers Inc. executive director, referred to the events “a political action,” not a strike.

Peter Davis, legal counsel with the Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission, a commission which administers collective bargaining laws, thinks differently. “A strike includes any concerted work stoppage by municipal employees, any concerted interruption of operation of services, or any concerted refusal to work or perform normal duties for the purpose of enforcing demands on a municipal employer.”

...(Walker's bill), if passed, would prohibit future strikes of the same kind. The bill reads, “This bill authorizes a state agency to discharge any state employee who fails to report to work as scheduled for any three unexcused working days during a state of emergency or who participates in a strike, work stoppage, sit−down, stay−in, slowdown, or other concerted activities to interrupt the of operations or services of state government, including specifically purported mass resignations or sick calls. Under the bill, engaging in any of these actions constitutes just cause for discharge/"

http://ballotnews.org/2011/02/18/14-democratic-senators-flee-wisconsin-teachers-strike-for-second-day-in-a-row/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #10
31. wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-11 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. So announce a strike
Don't call in sick. That's weak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-11 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. These teachers are union members who staged a "sickout"
in order to protest against Walker's bill to abolish collective bargaining. I don't see why you have a problem with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-11 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Why not announce a strike?
That seems more honest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pintobean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-11 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. It may come to that
but it makes no sense to do it before the law is enacted. It could be in court for years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-11 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. If the law is enacted they will be fired if they strike
that is why they held a strike in Feb - to protest the bill!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pintobean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-11 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. It wasn't a strike or a sick out.
They went to a protest instead of going to work, then claimed to be out sick. Some even turned in fraudulent Doctors' notes. They had no plan and winged it in a very poor manor.

They COULD be fired if they strike after the law is enacted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-11 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. A "sickout" IS a type of strike action
Edited on Thu Apr-14-11 07:09 PM by eowyn_of_rohan
This is used in cases where laws prohibit certain employees from declaring a strike. Police, firefighters, and air traffic controllers are among the groups commonly barred from striking: usually by state and federal laws meant to ensure the safety and/or security of the general public. So are teachers in some U.S. states.

That is from Wikipedia.

There was nothing dishonest about what they did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-11 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Not just good, excellent news
Union workers have a process to appeal unfair decisions by management, and I'm sure the school board's decision will be ruled illegal and unenforceable by an arbitrator. The teachers will receive full compensation for any lost wages, removal of any detrimental reports in their personnel records, and the board will have to pay the fees for passing their petulant little resolution, providing a good lesson in personal responsibility. I can't think of a better demonstration for folks to see why workers banding together for their own common good is a terrific idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
badtoworse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-11 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. On what basis do you think it would be overturned?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-11 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #18
29. Any number of reasons
First, the board made a blanket decision, and it's impossible to say why any particular teacher might have missed work that day. Second, sick leave is almost certainly a defined benefit, and denying the use of sick leave without citing a contract violation by any particular teacher who might have called in sick that day is grounds for a grievance. I don't have the district's contract in front of me, but there are almost certainly other grievable violations of the contract by the board's action.

That's one advantage of union representation: collective bargaining and a contract that defines the obligations and responsibilities of both workers and management. In "at will" employment, management can do pretty much as it pleases (within the law) and employees don't have much recourse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-11 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #12
27. +1000
Thank you for that. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 06:53 AM
Response to Reply #12
30. Excellent! Thanks for your take on this -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
white_wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-11 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. Wow.
I never thought I would see so much union bashing here on DU. It is really disappointing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-11 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Just look at some of the threads relating to American vs. Foreign cars yesterday...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-11 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Berserker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
2.  Hudson
is full of vindictive asswipes. Looks like a great reason to protest the Hudson Board of Education. Fucking repukes it never ends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrmpa Donating Member (707 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. It'll end when
the repukes no longer exist. I know their plan is to wipe out the left, but I'm not going anywhere, anytime soon. I will fight them tooth and nail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mysuzuki2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. I wonder if this will fly
most union contracts spell out in detail how sick time is granted, what kind of documentation is required etc. They also usually spell out clearly how discipline is imposed. The action of the board may turn out to be in violation of their contract. I predict this will end up in court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. Harsher penalties for people who discuss union activities at work?
I don't know how that can fly, is it actually legal for them to prevent workers from talking about their union? Considering that union activities directly relate to their job this seems particularly unjust.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-11 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
11.  I don't see how they can penalize them for that
If they talked about union activities at any other time while in the school, would that be illegal, too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. Harsher penalties for people who discuss union activities at work?
I don't know how that can fly, is it actually legal for them to prevent workers from talking about their union? Considering that union activities directly relate to their job this seems particularly unjust.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-11 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
24. freaking brownshirts... -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC