Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What did Obama mean by "spending reduction in the tax code"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-11 11:13 PM
Original message
What did Obama mean by "spending reduction in the tax code"?
Edited on Thu Apr-14-11 11:19 PM by grahamhgreen
". If, by 2014, our debt is not projected to fall as a share of the economy – or if Congress has failed to act – my plan will require us to come together and make up the additional savings with more spending cuts and more spending reductions in the tax code. That should be an incentive for us to act boldly now, instead of kicking our problems further down the road."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Abukhatar Donating Member (32 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-11 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. spending reductions in tax code
tax loopholes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frazzled Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-11 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. It was "tax expenditures"
Meaning, money the government technically pays out (i.e., loses) for deductions on things like mortgages and charitable donations. The government essentially pays people for the interest they pay on their home mortgages. This is fine for middle class people, but it's a giveaway to the wealthy.

Thus, for example, if someone is carrying a $4 million mortgage, Obama thinks they shouldn't be able to deduct all of the interest on that mortgage--only a certain portion of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-11 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. eliminating some of the things that businesses
or people can write off as deductions or claim tax credits for - some make sense and some can be good incentives... but some are just used by the wealthy and corporations who have the money to hire tax attorneys and strategists to avoid paying their fair share in taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-11 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm pretty sure that was his fancy way of saying "raise taxes" in some form or fashion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. According to Jon Stewart it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
6. Sounds like obtuse gobbledygook
that can be interpreted in a number of ways
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
7. May I suggest an interpreter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWebHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
8. he should have said raise taxes or at least raise revenues
that was too cute with words and erodes credibility. If you believe in a policy, say it, don't hide behind weasel words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I fear that it's a phrase that will be seen by liberals to mean "raise taxes on the wealthy", then,
he'll have an easy out claiming he never meant it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
10. Fewer deductions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razorman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
11. Tax hikes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
12. Tax increases
His terminology is ridiculous, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. It's a tongue-in-check homage to GOP horseshit like "premium support" (aka: vouchers).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC