Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ok the birther law is funny, BUT it is hysterical

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 07:42 PM
Original message
Ok the birther law is funny, BUT it is hysterical
for another reason.

1.- Muslims DO circumcise their kids... funny shit isn't it?

2.- You know who mostly does not? Hispanics... especially those from Mexican origin. (Don't ask how I know this, but I do)...

Funny shit indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Huh? I'm missing something here...
Does the birther law require presidential candidates to whack off the ends of their penises?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. To show that's been done
it is as good as your certificate. I mean good (white) bloodied Americans do this. THe history is a riot all on it's own, but saved the lives of a few Jews during WW II. How could Germans know if a POW was Jewish? Well look down there. In Europe it worked. But Americans circumcised most of their kids,,, Jew or not.

Crooks and Liars has some of the text. It is hysterical
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Here you go
Arizona Law Says Lack of Foreskin Acceptable Proof of Citizenship

Part of the controversial Arizona birther bill passed on Wednesday makes a certificate of circumcision (given to parent of a Jewish child after the religiously significant procedure is performed) acceptable proof of American citizenship for presidential candidates. While candidates won't be asked to "whip it out" in the State House, a documented circumcision will join a verified Christian baptism, postpartum hospital records and long-form birth certificiates as proof that candidates are indeed Americans.

Governor Brewer of Arizona has not taken a public stand on the bill, and will now have five days to sign or veto it before the law is automatically enacted.

There is likely to be much public debate over the bill, which seems to be validating the possession of a penis and/or demonstrable Judeo-Christian upbringing as preferrable characteristics of presidential candidates. Not to mention the fact that neither a certificate of circumcision nor baptismal record are in any way legal documents.

The circumcision issue is an interesting twist in the birther agenda, coming at a time when the humaneness of male circumcision--both in the U.S. and abroad-- is under hot debate. One might question if the radical birthers are now not only trying to shape the definition of who makes a viable U.S. president, but also what makes an American penis.

http://www.care2.com/causes/politics/blog/az-birther-law-says-lack-of-foreskin-acceptable-proof-of-citizenship/

Yep, they really are that twisted!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Oh my God, this is truly a new low. Sane Arizona residents have my sympathy,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. And - at least in this country - it doesn't happen to women much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Well yeah, I don't have THAT piece of equipment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TalkingDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
26. Interestingly... female "circumcision" would generally indicate foreign origin.
So.... this is a gender biased law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. They need to nip this law in the bud
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. It is going to... starting woith the very clear religious test
the certificate they will accept is that of a Moel... the guy that does it under Jewish Law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. Yeah, so? And the US State Department does the same thing:

Secondary Evidence of U.S. Citizenship

http://travel.state.gov/passport/get/secondary_evidence/secondary_evidence_4315.html

If you were born in the United States and cannot present primary evidence of U.S. citizenship, submit a combination of early public records as evidence of your U.S. citizenship. Early public records must be submitted with a birth record or Letter of No Record. Early public records should show your name, date of birth, place of birth, and preferably be created within the first five years of your life. Examples of early public records are:

* Baptismal certificate
* Hospital birth certificate
* Census record
* Early school record
* Family bible record
* Doctor's record of post-natal care

Early Public Records are not acceptable when presented alone.


----------

Notice how the EXAMPLES of the types of stuff that can be used as secondary evidence includes religious records.

This is really nothing unusual - at least in terms of what kinds of things are normally used as secondary evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. See bellow for my answer
since we are not even talking about the same thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. I did see your comment below, and it still makes no sense

The AZ bill lists a number of things commonly used as secondary evidence of birthplace.

What is it that is odd about that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. I wonder what requirements will be for penis inspector?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I could go on to a few sick jokes
that medic in me... but I think I will abstain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Oh, now you've gone and done it.
Don Knotts: "Nip it in the bud! You got to nip it in the bud! ... Nip it! You go read any book you want on the subject of child discipline, and you'll find that every one of 'em is in favor of bud-nippin'... Only one way to take care of it."
Andy Griffith: "Nip it."
Knotts: "In the bud."

Wave file: http://www.rosswalker.co.uk/tv_sounds/sounds_files_20100522_6746301/andy_griffith/nip_it3.wav

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
24. Thanks, I forgot about that old skit!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
11. Hehehehehe
Some seriously sick ReTHUGS live in Arizona.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terra Alta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
13. What is WITH Arizona, anyway?
First SB 1070 and now this. I feel sorry for all the liberals/progressives in AZ. I thought North and South Carolina were red state hell but I think AZ has us beat!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. White Elites that can read the census data
and are scared shitless...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kceres Donating Member (839 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
14. Neither of my boys are cut.
As a matter of fact, because I am pretty good friends with most all of the moms in this neighborhood, I can attest to the fact that NONE of the boys on our block are circumcised. We are talking nine boys from six -to-eighteen years-old. This is a pretty diverse working-class neighborhood. It is simply not a given anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. I know but they are the next generaiton
And also they will only take the certificate from a Moel... religious test and all. It hit it's max of close to 97% of white american kids in the 1960s.

Ever since it's been retreating. So if your kids lose their long form birth certs... better find a Moel to do this as adults!

Oy...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
15. And only certain folks have baptismal certificates

These things are called secondary evidence of citizenship, and are commonly used by, e.g. the US State Department. The fact that the AZ law listed a circumcision record along with such things as a baptismal certificate is simply being inclusive of the kinds of things that normally pass for such secondary evidence.

To folks who have never encountered the subject, it probably sounds funny, but only through a combination of ignorance and lack of context.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. And those are used by STATE... for matters of citizenshi
usually when you come to the US as an immigrant, adopted or you are the kid of a US citizen and happen to come from a country where documents are sketchy at best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. And your point is what?
Edited on Fri Apr-15-11 08:07 PM by jberryhill
Yes, religious records are used as secondary evidence of US citizenship.

The rest of your sentence is incomprehensible, because in the context of the question of secondary evidence of US citizenship, we are not talking about people who "come to the US as an immigrant", duh.

The AZ birther bill simply appears to have copied a common list of things which are used as secondary evidence in the absence of a birth certificate. I guess I just don't see the particular humor. The bill is NOT requiring circumcision or a certificate of circumcision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. These guys want to make it PRIMARY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. No, you are dead wrong and it is clear you did not read the AZ bill
Edited on Sun Apr-17-11 12:36 PM by jberryhill
The AZ birther bill lists a number of things that may be considered if a birth certificate is not available.

You have no clue what you are talking about and have not read the the thing.

Here's the relevant text:

http://www.azleg.gov//FormatDocument.asp?inDoc=/legtext/50leg/1r/bills/hb2177s.htm&Session_ID=102

IF THE CANDIDATE DOES NOT POSSESS A LONG FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE AS REQUIRED BY THIS PARAGRAPH, THE CANDIDATE MAY ATTACH TWO OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS THAT SHALL TAKE THE PLACE OF THE LONG FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE.....

-----

It is a stupid piece of legislation, but there is no need for you to lie about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoGOPZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
20. "Here, hold on to this, in case he wants to run for President one day." nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 05:54 AM
Response to Original message
27. Y'all might thing this is funny....
but I'd be terrorfied of the giant, hooded snake in Obama's pants too...

If I were sexually repressed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC