Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why is a 3% tax increase on the richest considered "socialism" but a 14% pay cut on the middle class

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
BigBearJohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 12:24 AM
Original message
Why is a 3% tax increase on the richest considered "socialism" but a 14% pay cut on the middle class
is "doing your part?"

just askin...:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
white_wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. Because they have no damn clue what socialism is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YellowRubberDuckie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
15. That and people hear Socialism and think Stalin.
People are ignorant and scared. My mom was like, that scares the hell out of me. I was like, mom you have no idea what socialism is. There are democratic socialist countries all over Europe. You know how you have no health care and can't get a colonoscopy to find out what is going on with the cramps you have? Well, you'd have it. These countries are far more advanced socially than we are. Stop thinking USSR and start thinking Canada or Sweden. She looked at me funny, rolled her eyes and got that "don't make any sudden moves and my idiot daughter won't talk crazy anymore" look on her face. I hate how I will always be dumb in her eyes, even though I'm way more educated and am far better traveled than this woman. SIGH. Parents, huh?
Duckie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. because in our fucked up culture known as America
you are seen as a loser unless you are rich. Therefore, all the goodies should go to the rich and everyone underneath them can suck it up! What a country! <sarcasm>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
14. I believe what you are describing is actually an epidemic of
narcissism. Your comments are valid and significant. Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmericaIsGreat Donating Member (611 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. And because they're scumbag motherfuckers
Who are simply shameless as they "protect" their wealth from the middle and lower class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
4. And why is it called "redistributing wealth" only when
the middle class and the poor want a larger share of the pie?

Why isn't it "redistributing wealth" when tax policies help the rich get richer while everyone else's wealth declines?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cresent City Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Everything from buying a pack of gum to the AIG bailout is redistribution
The devil is in the details, how much, in what direction, and is it fair.

Let's look at some other phrasing. Boehner's been repeating "Taxing the very people we expect to create jobs." "Expect" is the key word there. We've been expecting it for 10 years, muthafucka.

The top 2% can pay higher taxes, and still create the same number of jobs, give the same amount to charity, live lavishly, and still have money, just slightly less. This is the sleight of hand in the three card monty game of trickle down. The rich don't have to necessarily reduce the amount they invest in the economy by the exact amount of a tax increase. If one of them did, it would be out of spite. Higher taxes don't reduce their ability to create jobs, just the after tax total. Come to think of it, creating jobs costs them money too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
5. It's all about shared sacrifice. Here's how it works ...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anneboleyn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. Great. Exactly. Shared sacrifice means the middle class loses wages, jobs, and benefits.
And the rich get an even bigger tax cut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 12:38 AM
Response to Original message
6. It's an arbitrary, perjorative term nowadays.
"Assault weapon"


"Partial-birth abortion"


"Socialism"


"ObamaCare"


"Liberal"


"Tax hike"


"Assault magazine" (new one; watch it grow)



All words now with fluid definitions that are designed or have had their definitions modified to create an immediate, negative emotion in the listener.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
7. Do You Own A Corporate Media Empire?
Well, if you did, then perhaps you would share some of Rupert Murdoch's pain. The corporate media tends to present reality through the eyes of its billionaire owners.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
9. k
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
11. republicans are not about logic, they're about propaganda
as far as they're concerned logic is just some elitist obsession democrats have that trips them up and keeps them from playing brutal strategic politics.

all they are interested in doing is pairing the ideas they favor with happy and positive emotionally laden words like "american" and "patriotic" and "freedom" and pairing the ideas they loathe with rotten words, or words they can make rotten by always saying them with a sneer and derision like "socialism" or "liberal" or "entitlement" or "nanny state" or "big government".

this is how they can label obama a socialist and a nazi in the same breath. they're not bothered by the illogic of it. they're only interested in attached rotten labels to obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 03:29 AM
Response to Original message
12. The 'skin in the game' is never their skin n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 07:08 AM
Response to Original message
13. Because we live in a country that embraces Welfare for the richest! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
16. recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmandaRuth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
17. my own personal media guide:
tea party/repub media sycophant: Tax cuts for the rich create jobs!

What i would say: Quit lying - no they don't, where are the jobs, other than China? Why has the biggest increase in jobs been in very low wage service sector jobs?

tea party/repub media sycophant: The rich are over taxed, they pay 40% of all taxes paid!

What i would say: Damn Straight - they have over 90% of all wealth-they should be paying more.

tea party/repub media sycophant: Corporation are overtaxed - 35% !!

What i would say: Most corporation pay no taxes, that is widely reported and known, quit repeating meaningless slogans. If you want to talk tax reform, elimination of loopholes and subsidies, I'll listen, but until then, just let me say that even Corps in China pay more taxes to China than US corporations pay to the US. We should penalize those corporations that outsource jobs, and develop tax laws that reward truly small main street American businesses and middle class Americans.

I know it is not this easy, but in my mind it is.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
18. Because Americans believe in "rewarding success" even if that "success" is inherited
or brought about by criminal or immoral behavior. We also seem to believe in punishing failure. "Blaming the victim" is EXTREMELY popular now (more than ever). Perhaps because of religious or New Age beliefs that everyone gets what they deserves, or that they even wished for what they have or don't have. These beliefs promote the idea that charity is not a virtue at all, but a reward for poor behavior, laziness and negative thinking. People are very happy to say "I've got mine, screw you". Their belief system allows them to go through life thinking that because they are "positive" and self confident nothing bad will EVER happen to them, and that they, in due time, will be among the uber rich as well. Therefore they need to protect and advance the wealthy at the expense of the "undeserving and negative" poor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC