Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

“Sleeping on the job” scandal reveals exploitation of US air traffic controllers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 05:04 AM
Original message
“Sleeping on the job” scandal reveals exploitation of US air traffic controllers
The scandal over air traffic controllers falling asleep on the job illustrates the dangerous conditions at US airports almost 30 years after Pres. Ronald Reagan crushed the strike by PATCO, which workers waged to preserve safety and working conditions...It has since come to light that there were four known incidents of lone air traffic controllers sleeping on the job in 2010. This week air traffic controllers were found asleep at airports in Knoxville, Tennessee; Reno, Nevada; and Seattle, Washington...

Predictably, politicians and the media have attacked the air traffic controllers...At least 31 major airports staff only one controller on overnight shifts. The FAA has not released the names of these airports, but they include Richmond International Airport, San Diego International Airport, and Sacramento International Airport.

In early 2008 there were 11,000 FAA air traffic controllers in the US—the same number as worked in the industry at the time of the PATCO strike... The consequences of this severe understaffing were tragically revealed in 2006 in Lexington, Kentucky, when a Comair Flight crashed after attempting to take off from the wrong runway, killing all 47 passengers and two of the three-member crew. After correctly giving the plane its runway assignment, the lone air traffic controller on duty had proceeded to other tasks, as required by FAA protocol.

The FAA budget is about to be cut again, but the only question is by how much. House Republicans have passed a bill rolling back funding to 2008 levels, while Senate Democrats have pushed through a bill that would keep funding stagnant. If recent short-term budget negotiations are an indication, the final bill will hew much more closely to Republican demands.

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2011/apr2011/airt-a16.shtml



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JohnyCanuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 05:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. Having worked shift work over a period of a few years
the controllers have my absolute sympathy and support. I worked as a computer operator for several years and the job required rotating 12 hr shifts. On a night shift rotation when I had to sleep during the day, I found I got, on average, usually between 3 and 4 hrs sleep before having to go back in for my next shift and frequently found myself fighting to stay awake while at work. Fortunately I usually had 2 coworkers with me on the night shift sharing the work load and having people to talk to and interact with was a big help in staying awake. Also if one of us wanted to use our break time for a snooze that was not a problem, because we knew there would be someone around to wake us up when we were needed in the control room again.

IMHO it is absolutely ludicrous to expect one person to work a solo night shift rotation in a sedentary job like an air traffic controller without making allowances for what shift work does to the body clock.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varkam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 06:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I second that. I've worked a third shift job while going to school for almost six years now.
I completely agree with everything that you just said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 05:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. in the real world of manufacturing ...
no one is allowed to work in a similar situation as the traffic controllers. why? insurance,workman`s comp.,and wrongful death lawsuits.

i guess the faa figured that the legal problems were a cheaper price to pay than having another person in the tower.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 06:11 AM
Response to Original message
4. And that's the story M$Greedia won't touch
Some time ago Sully (the Hudson river hero) also spoke about sleep deprived pilots being exploited.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
5. It's kind of like putting off funding to fix the levees in New Orleans.
Sooner or later, it will bite you in the ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 06:30 AM
Response to Original message
6. I'm just happy that I see no more flights in my future
My wife won't get on an airplane even if it would save her life and sometimes I can see why that is.
Small planes I like to fly in but the commercial jets not so much anymore. Back when I was young and in the Navy I flew a lot but thats been 40 plus years ago, back before the 747 was flying. damn I'm getting old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Agony Donating Member (865 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 06:39 AM
Response to Original message
7. The Conservative world view says that not enough people have died yet
to balance the cost of hiring more ATControllers What are you all risk averse or something?

They just do not care... if some people die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 06:39 AM
Response to Original message
8. The article memtions that the fourth days hours allow for a long weekend.
Edited on Sat Apr-16-11 06:40 AM by dkf
Is this something the FAA controllers are allowed to do at their preference or something they are being forced to do by scheduling? How much of this is too much flexibility given to accommodate the controller and how much of it is dictated by the guys upstairs?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
9. Back in the day the PATCO strike was about similar conditions
Now, NATCA does not have the right to strike.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC