Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I Have an Idea for a New Law

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 04:44 PM
Original message
I Have an Idea for a New Law
It seems that there are many people in this country that feel we need to spend a lot of money, time, and bodies on war. This includes people in the administration and congress.

I propose that for every person killed in the military that the two senators and the district rep. are required to attend the wake and funeral of the deceased military personal. The vice president would also be required to attend. If they feel so strongly that we need to fight all these wars then they need to stand up for that war. What better way to show the families and friends that they stand behind the wars and the military personal.

They will also be required to answer any and all questions that the family or friends may have. No ducking out early because they have important things to do. What is more important than standing up for the wars that they vote for.

Failure to attend or answer any and all questions will be subject to a $10,000 personal fine paid by the congressional person out of their own pocket and possible jail time. The vice president is subject to the same penalties.

If war is so important then it is time for these elected officials show how important it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Drale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Dick Durbin has attended funerals when he is in Chicago
and he came to visit one of my friends who was wounded in Iraq, but Mark Kirk would not be caught dead at a military funeral and neither would my rep Judy Biggert.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. Simpler: re-institute the draft.
And include women in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I don't know why people think that would do anything
all its going to do is piss of a whole generation of young people, because I for one will not serve and I know plenty of other people who won't either. That is basically mandatory military service and that is a road which leads to fascism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. "...all its going to do is piss of a whole generation of young people..."
Exactly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. Nope, not the entire generation
There will always be exemptions, if this idea EVER came anywhere near becoming law, both the Dems and the Repukes would make sure there were exemptions for their young Tads and Muffys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. If EVERYONE has to serve, no exceptions ... war ends ... If the Bush twins HAD
to go to Iraq ... Iraq does not happen.

If the kids of the super rich had to go, war ends.

That's the only way a draft works. No deferments. If we go to war, everyone goes. Or no one does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Show me anywhere where such a draft existed in this country
and you might be able to convince me that it could possibly happen again, especially with women included.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. It has NEVER existed in this country.
But that is the point. The RISK must be evenly distributed. If the kids of the wealthy are just as likely to get called up, no exceptions (including the women), the dynamics change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 06:13 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Well, being as the rich
own the very same Congress that would have to write a law establishing a draft, we will never see your perfect-world version of one. Given that, I'd just as soon not see any draft. Playing games with people's lives is something only Republicons should be seen doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. You really think Bush would have cared?
I don't in fact I think it would have given him the troops to start even more wars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. His corporate handlers would have said otherwise.
Imagine a draft with NO EXCEPTIONS (that is the hard part I know) ... but with that, the pain is distributed evenly across Americans.

Today, the only people really "at war" are the families who signed up. Sending them is easy. You can hear right wingers say "well, they signed up".

If every kid was at risk of going, every time, Americans who abstractly support a war, but who know their kids aren't going, now have skin in the game.

I suspect that the support for wars of folly would decrease. We'd only go to war when we all believed it was indeed necessary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phasma ex machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. I propose that people who vote for war lead troops into battle from the front line.
Another step necessary in this fight to smash the war racket is the limited plebiscite to determine whether a war should be declared. A plebiscite not of all the voters but merely of those who would be called upon to do the fighting and dying. There wouldn't be very much sense in having a 76-year-old president of a munitions factory or the flat-footed head of an international banking firm or the cross-eyed manager of a uniform manufacturing plant – all of whom see visions of tremendous profits in the event of war – voting on whether the nation should go to war or not. They never would be called upon to shoulder arms – to sleep in a trench and to be shot. Only those who would be called upon to risk their lives for their country should have the privilege of voting to determine whether the nation should go to war. - War is a Racket
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. At one time that was the case
Many senators and Representatives gave up their posts during the Civil War to join the army and lead troops. But that was back in the day when you could raise a company of men yourself and go to join the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 06:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
22. That is the definition of leader-guy up front.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. I would schedule the funeral for 3 AM on Sunday for optimum senatorial inconvenience. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mnemosyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. Do families of soldiers get the fine money? I would like to see them
have to face the results of their choices by attending every funeral also.

Thanks for asking, Angry Dragon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I did not think of that
the families would get the fine money
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mnemosyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Very good. I can definitely get behind this then, AD. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. gonna see one big mass funeral every 4 months or so if that one passes
which it won't
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
13. My reps do that- and they're all very muchh against the wars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terra Alta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
14. I would love to see this happen.
Maybe this way it will be more personal to our elected officials. Make them realize this is a human being who was killed, and not just some number. I'm sure such a law would eventually lead to all our troops being brought home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 06:18 AM
Response to Original message
21. How about anyone who is for a war automatically signs their enlistment papers.
No exceptions for age, social status, physical status or anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC