|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
snagglepuss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 07:34 PM Original message |
Don't let it happen here. Urge your Reps to co-sponsor the Nuclear Power Plant Safety Act |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shagbark Hickory (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 07:37 PM Response to Original message |
1. Kinda hard to be in favor of this safety act when you're a supporter of phasing out nukes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demeter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 07:42 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Say anything, but stop the madness, is my strategy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snagglepuss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 07:49 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Is there such legislation being drafted at this moment? This can start the ball rolling. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shagbark Hickory (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 08:10 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. For what? Phasing out nukes or phasing out earthquakes? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snagglepuss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 08:15 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Phasing out nukes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shagbark Hickory (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 09:02 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. I'm not aware of any legislation or even a petition to phase out this dirty, dangerous technology. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snagglepuss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 10:12 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. So that being the case do you not think this legislation would be a good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shagbark Hickory (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 10:15 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Yes, lets phase them out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snagglepuss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 10:23 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Interesting that you refuse to address the point on the OP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shagbark Hickory (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 10:31 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. How so? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snagglepuss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-18-11 05:10 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. kick nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
immoderate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 09:16 PM Response to Original message |
7. immoderate's rule: (improbable) X (time) = (inevitable) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marions ghost (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-18-11 06:11 PM Response to Original message |
13. from the letter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Apr 17th 2024, 10:15 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC