Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

'Atlas Shrugged' Derails?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 06:46 PM
Original message
'Atlas Shrugged' Derails?
from Box Office Mojo:


'Atlas Shrugged' Derails?

Atlas Shrugged: Part I was the top-grossing limited release of the weekend, generating an estimated $1.7 million at 300 single-screen locations.

For a pure independent release, Atlas Shrugged: Part I's opening was fine. But for the first-ever adaptation of Ayn Rand's influential mega-selling 1957 novel that had far more media hype than any other independent movie could dream of, it was disappointing.

There aren't many direct comparisons, because it's rare that an adaptation of such a famous book gets such a modest release. Atlas Shrugged: Part I opened higher than recent limited Christian movies The Grace Card and To Save a Life, and it was distributor Rocky Mountain Pictures' third highest-grossing launch, behind End of the Spear and Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed. But none of those movies are significant in the grand scheme of things. They're all still blips, even if Atlas was a slightly bigger blip than many.

What's more, Atlas Shrugged: Part I's box office dropped six percent from Friday to Saturday, further indicating niche appeal. The movie would require exceptional holds moving forward to right its course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lob1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. I wouldn't buy advance tickets for parts 2 and 3.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. I guess people don't appreciate Great Art.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
3waygeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. I think you left out an 'F'... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. (sigh) The World will never understand a TRUE GENIUS!!! (sob)
Ayn Rand was a VISIONARY! A FREAKIN VISIONARY!!!

(sob sob, whine whine)

Why can't I be an exalted sociopath!!!! I DESERVE THAT!!!! IT'S MY FUCKING BIRTHRIGHT!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
localroger Donating Member (663 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. To be an exalted socopath, first...
...you must be a sociopath.

It's actually not a thing you can fake. These people are broken. They can fake being normal far more easily than normal people can fake being like them because when a normal person scrunches their face up to make an angry grimace, we cannot help but also feel anger; the face packing is a two-way process. That hinders our ability as actors. But the sociopath has no such distractions; he can feign love and terror with great accuracy, because he's not distracted by actual feelings no matter what he does with his facial muscles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. Her vision was a bit fuzzy and dim, I think...
One thing that hasn't been pointed out in all the negative reviews: the parts of the movie that are not stock footage (the shots of Hank Rearden's steel mill, the big derailment at the beginning and the trip on Dagny's bullet train are all stock footage) are out of focus. The stock stuff is crisp as a new dollar bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. Atlas Shrugged. Scuba Yawned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. Atlas Barfed would be a better title nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brickbat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. Sometimes the invisible hand gives you a visible middle finger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mistertrickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Now THAT is funny! Gotta remember that one hee heeee! nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioDoink Donating Member (52 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. Never read her books.
Edited on Sun Apr-17-11 07:30 PM by OhioDoink
But is part 3 about her running out of money after the cancer and living off Social Security and Medicare?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. A wise choice, n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
12. Dagny Butthurt.
Who is John Dolt?

Looks like Atlas Laid an Egg.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Magron Donating Member (80 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
13. As a lifetime SciFi fan I read every one of the 1200 pages
and I guarantee you, that woman had issues. I have to wonder if a look into her chest freezer might not have ended her career.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimlup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. I made a decision not to actually read the final page
as a protest against the pointlessly unrealistic, simplistic and blatantly flawed viewpoint expressed in the hopelessly biased author.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FVZA_Colonel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. When the best thing a fictional work supposedly has going for it is a retro-futuristic
visual style that is, more or less, divorced from the actual content, you know you've got a stinker on your hands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
14. I worked in the film industry for years that is a horrible gross . . .
$5,666 per screen, and assuming an average ticket price of $8.50 that is 666 (LOL) viewers per theater. You figure the average theater has 200 seats and if there were 12 showings per screen that is 55.5 persons per showing. . .THAT SUCKS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmahaBlueDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
18. It could not fairly be called a "de-rail"
Edited on Mon Apr-18-11 12:15 AM by OmahaBlueDog
It's a low budget release of a film based on a work by a well known author. There are other worse performing, comparable examples.

The film adaptation of Kurt Vonnegut's "Mother Night" in 1996 did a total gross of $403,701. On its first weekend, it did $48,661 in 8 theaters (so it outperformed "Shrugged" on a per screen basis). It starred Nick Nolte and was never shown in more than 30 theaters.

Similarly, Vonnegut's "Breakfast of Champions" (with a pretty good cast, including Bruce Willis, Albert Finney, Nick Nolte, Barbara Hershey, Lukas Haas, Omar Epps, and a small appearance by Owen Wilson)appeared in 11 theaters and made $178,000.

The fact remains that "Shrugged pt1" has probably picked the low hanging fruit. It may get some decent overseas box, but I'd bet against it having any more $1M+ weekends in the US. My guess is that they recoup the $10M budget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erose999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Mother Night with Nolte was awesome. The B-of-C with Willis kinda sucked. There was really

no way anyone could make a cohesive screenplay out of Breakfast of Champions though, with all of its rambling segues, and such. Maybe Guy Ritchie could do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MattSh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
19. What does freaking Atlas Shrugged...
have to do with Christian? Seems quite the opposite to me.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. I think it's about the most comparable niche-market films...
Films that have a lot of buzz, but only within a small sliver of the movie-going public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. In an odd mating many modern megachurches
have sort of merged objectivism and Christianity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iwillnevergiveup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
21. Instead of "Atlas Shrugged"
I'd have to recommend "The Talented Mr. Ripley."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC