Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Barack Obama Is Now The Biggest Tax Cutter In American History

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 07:24 PM
Original message
Barack Obama Is Now The Biggest Tax Cutter In American History
http://www.politicususa.com/en/obama-great-tax-cutter

Beneath all of the Republican and Tea Party grumbling about taxes, one key fact continues to be ignored. According to the Tax Policy Center, Federal taxes are lower than at any time since 1955. Obama has now reduced taxes by more than any president since Dwight D. Eisenhower.

According to the Orange County Register, “For the past two years, a family of four earning the median income has paid less in federal income taxes than at any time since at least 1955, according to the Tax Policy Center. All federal, state and local taxes combined are a lower percentage of per-capita income than at any time since the 1960s, according to the Tax Foundation. The highest income-tax bracket is its lowest since 1992. At 35 percent, it’s well below the 50 percent mark of much of the 1980s and the 70 percent bracket of the 1970s.”

The problem is that the tax cuts have not promoted economic growth and have caused the federal deficit to explode, “Those lower taxes have helped give the U.S. government the lowest revenues as a percentage of gross domestic product of seven industrialized countries surveyed in 2010 by the Congressional Research Services. (The other countries were Japan, Canada, the United Kingdom, Germany, Italy and France.) The U.S. also had the lowest spending as a percentage of the GDP. But with the biggest gap between revenues (31.6 percent of GDP) and expenditures (42.2 percent of GDP), the U.S. also posted the largest deficit as a percentage of GDP – 10.5 percent.”

The answer to America’s revenue shortfall is to raise taxes. The US revenue gap could be closed immediately with a tax increase, but Republicans and tea partiers go insane as soon as the prospect is mentioned even in the most delicate manner. The Tea Party set believes to their core that they are being overtaxed, but reality doesn’t match their perception.

More at the link --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. actions speak louder than words
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. How by any stretch of the imagination is Obama the
biggest tax cutter? He raised the cigarette tax as soon as he took office, he extended the taxcuts that were already in effect when he took office. The only taxes I know of he cut was the making work pay tax cut that is now gone and the temporary payroll tax cut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Extending means he owns them. Since the cuts were to sunset they are not existing policy
You would have a point IF the Bush cuts were permanent and he failed to increase them but in this case they are now the Obama tax cuts.

They can't be blamed on anyone else other than the Congress that passed them but he didn't have a veto overridden but rather brokered the deal and signed the bill into law.

He owns them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. The Bush tax cuts didn't become any bigger when Obama
renewed them? Besides that we don't need tax cuts, we need revenue! It was totally irresponsible to extend the tax cuts on people over $250000. I know the old argument about unemployment, I think if the president would have took that to the people he would have won the argument. After all we got creamed in the election anyway. The congress should have passed a budget last year before the election instead they played politics and now look at the mess we face..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I'm just saying he owns them and agree he should have flushed them.
I'll add that the vast majority of the cuts under 250k are irresponsible as well.

I don't think that 100k is anything like the same as millions and billions but that is still much more than most and such people significantly benefit from the system and should be chipping in a bit more rather than cutting muscle and bone from those of much more limited means or cutting what insufficient safety nets we have left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. Federal Individual Income Tax Rates History
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. are you refering to his physical height or reference to extending Bush tax cuts for the wealthy? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
8. Thanks ever so much, Mr President, for shouting out that Dems are bad and Repubs good.
Could you PLEASE STOP demonizing paying for public goods? If tax cuts are so fucking helpful, why have they resulted in a massive deline in the standard of living over the last decade? What political benefit are you anticipating here? That non-rich teabagging birther whackjobs are even going to notice that they got tax cuts? That public employees will come to appreciate your denigration of their work as something that everyone else needs to be "relieved" from the "burden" of?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
9. AND, that is precisely WHY...
...the REAL Owners of America will grant him a 2nd Term,
.
.
Well, THAT,
and starting another WAR,
and granting amnesty to War Criminals & War Profiteers,
and expanding the powers of the Unitary Executive,
and Mandates without a Public Option,
and more Union Busting,
and co-signing the Republican Frame that Social Spending is THE Problem,
and....~
:patriot:




Who will STAND UP and FIGHT for THIS American Majority?
"By their WORKS you will know them."










Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC