"Greetings Libtards" --- The Conservabot Returns --- by Tom Tomorrow

[kpete]

The Conservabot Returns
by Tom Tomorrow

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/04/18/965604/-The-Conservabot-Returns

[xchrom]

1. and you are probably a homosexual...

:rofl: end with that and it's a guaranteed Win.

[meegbear]

2. And you are probably homosexual ...

:rofl:

[HughBeaumont]

3. He's even SHAPED like a conservabot - a square peg!

K & R.

[pokerfan]

5. in case you missed his introduction

From February...

[bahrbearian]

7. Thanks

:thumbsup:

[gratuitous]

4. Can a contract with Fox be far behind?

Getting a little glare from the forehead, but they can fix that in the green room.

[readmoreoften]

6. Libtards? Sounds like Rahm and the So-Called-Centrist Movement.

[CrossChris]

12. Haha, true. Same diff.

I bet Tom's got a few in store for Rahm before he's through.

[BlancheSplanchnik]

8. your emotional attachment &/or loyalty to the nation-state

is suspect???

Wait, isn't it the CONservatives that accuse dissenters of anti-patriotism, and hang their "right to bear arms" harangues on the dangers posed by those freedum-hating libtards?


:crazy:

[gratuitous]

10. There's a special programming subroutine

It allows conservabots to pivot on a philosophical dime, and simultaneously declaim total fealty to the United States of America while suspecting anyone whose emotional attachment to same if it's for the "wrong reasons." Notions of liberty, freedom and justice only go so far, and once that limit is reached, conservabots react as programmed.

[BlancheSplanchnik]

15. Haaaaaaa! best explanation evar!

You really got it right, gratuitous!

Once their limits are reached......

*SPROING!*

:rofl:

[tclambert]

21. Whirr. Ambiguous statement detected.

What is suspect? That subject's "emotional attachment &/or loyalty to the nation-state" is too high, or too low? One way of interpreting it suspects an overly sentimental attachment to the nation-state resulting in opposition to the righteous will of the multi-national corporate oligarchs. Another interpretation suspects an insufficient patriotism resulting in questioning the righteious assertions of Party leadership.

Processing. Processing. Conclusion: Conservabot may believe both conflicting interpretations simultaneouly as hypocrisy avoidance routine has been disabled.

[BlancheSplanchnik]

24. can't believe CONserv-O-bot prototypes would have had any

hypocrisy avoidance routines!

More like, hypocrisy substitutions for democratic/ethical logic routines..... :P

[progressoid]

9. That's pretty much most of RW TV pundits.

[Brewman_Jax]

11. Just like a RW-bot

the deficit or national debt is never a problem--as long as the GOP is in charge. As soon as they get kicked out of office, suddenly the deficit or national debt becomes a HUGH problem--I'm series!

:silly:

[WillyT]

13. Conservabot Looks An Awful Lot Like Ari Fleischer...

Just sayin...

:shrug:

:evilgrin:

[HughBeaumont]

25. SOUNDS a lot like Airy Fleecer . . .

:rofl:

[crickets]

14. Eerily accurate. K&R

[johnfromokc]

16. K&R!!

OMFG! This is great! I had been using the term "Conserv-O-bot" long before I saw this. Can't recall where I heard it first, but what a coinkydink to see this.

I posted it on my conservobot brothers FB page. :rofl:

Gonna have some fun with this one. :evilgrin:

[ThoughtCriminal]

17. Robots like this would make me miss "Battlebots"

Easier to reason with.

[Armstead]

18. Beep - kick -- beep

[OwnedByFerrets]

19. This one is priceless

[tclambert]

20. The robots are taking over!

First it was the car factories. Then vacuuming. Then the military. Then Jeopardy. Now they're taking over political punditry. Skynet wins!

[valerief]

22. BWAHAHAHAHA!

:rofl:

[classof56]

23. Big K&R

Love it!

:kick:

[ronnie624]

26. Lol!

:thumbsup:

[Warren DeMontague]

27. "sigh.. you're going to make me argue with your robot, aren't you?"

:rofl:

Man, I know the feeling.