Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

17.9% of $13.562 trillion dept held by Social Security Trust Fund.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 10:18 AM
Original message
17.9% of $13.562 trillion dept held by Social Security Trust Fund.
China holds 9.5%. Perspective.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sen-don-riegle/post_1901_b_845106.html


Why aren't our 'leaders' talking about how to pay us back? Why are they putting Social Security on the chopping block when it does not contribute to the deficit? Where is Al's "lock box"? Why is Social Security being used as a slush fund?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. Anthony Wiener tweeted about this last week
And it deserves to be disseminated widely. The pretense among the baggers is that we are perennially in debt to China, but the truth is that we are dramatically in debt to our own seniors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PDJane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yes. Congratulations.
The reason for the social security cuts and medicare cuts is that, if it's framed correctly, that money will not have to be paid back to the 'American people' that the conservatives are so fond of blathering about. It's theft, and a fine way to decrease the debt. It's vicious, and it will only work if one assumes that the people don't catch on...or if there is a police state already in place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. They can mack us and call it "renegotiate" instead of default, though they are defaulting.
Go "renegotiate" with China, fuckers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
4. remember this is just those two programs
we also owe ourselves on our usa,state,and local bond issues. let`s not forget the veterans benefits and the va health care.

add all the money that we owe ourselves make`s the money we owe china a mere drop in the bucket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. Because so much of the debt is held by the SSA.
That will have to be paid back.

If you want to have a balanced budget, you need to reduce other spending. If you need to plop $300 billion into the SSA, that money comes from someplace.

If you don't care about balancing the budget, then you securitize the debt and sell it off to the public or to other countries. Otherwise instead of selling $600 billion in T-bills you have to sell $900 billion. The market might not like that. It also means that that interest rate is negotiable, instead of fixed and self-contained.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. You do realize that, by federal law...
the SS account surplus is required to be invested in U.S. Treasury securities, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. Please fix your subject line. Shouldn't that 'dept ' be 'debt'?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yes, you are right, but it is too late for me to fix.
:dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
9. Wait till I turn 66 -- then I want to call in the loan.
I'm afraid that the U.S. government won't be good for it in the long run. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC