Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GAB: Partial Hand Recount in Waukesha County, Wisconsin Supreme Court Race

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-21-11 05:17 PM
Original message
GAB: Partial Hand Recount in Waukesha County, Wisconsin Supreme Court Race
By "partial," I mean that some places across the state will have hand recounts. The GAB and the two candidates agreed to hand count those areas that used Optech Eagle machine vote tabulators.

GAB

The Government Accountability Board, represented by the Wisconsin Department of Justice, filed a legal action in Dane County Circuit Court Thursday to establish the ground rules for Optech Eagle tabulating equipment used in the statewide recount of votes in the Wisconsin Supreme Court election. Attorneys for the G.A.B. and the candidates reached a stipulated agreement to hand-count ballots in parts of 31 counties that use Optech Eagle scanners.


more...
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/04/21/969066/-GAB:-Partial-Hand-Recount-in-Waukesha-County,-Wisconsin-Supreme-Court-Race
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-21-11 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Actually they need a full hand recount of the whole state.
If hanky panky occurred, the tabulating equipment would have been taken into consideration and the places most apt to be hand counted would have been left alone..hanky panky only in the part that wouldn't have been apt to be hand counted. Therefore a deal would be reached to exclude the those areas and the GOP would have no sweat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-21-11 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. this deal is for parts of 31 counties
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nebenaube Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-21-11 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. That sucks..
I don't think it was the scanners, I think they used the touch screens to flip votes...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buddysmellgood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-21-11 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I don't think we have touch screens here. There are a few for the disabled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nebenaube Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. And they were used extensively due to a shortage of ballots n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. accidental shortage no doubt
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC