LoZoccolo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-21-11 08:12 PM
Original message |
Poll question: Would you support an increase in soft drink sales taxes to decrease sales taxes on other groceries? |
Curmudgeoness
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-21-11 08:15 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Other. My state does not have sales tax on food |
|
and that is the only fair thing.
|
Tx4obama
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-21-11 08:19 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Increase soft drink taxes and LOWER CIGARETTE TAXES !!! :) n/t |
notadmblnd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-21-11 08:24 PM
Response to Original message |
3. groceries, including pop are non-taxable items where I live |
|
So no I would not support a tax increase on any store bought grocery item. I would support a 1% Federal sales tax on all other non essential items though. I've also thought maybe have a Federal Lottery to raise revenue? But no one wants to talk about raising revenue.
|
ZombieHorde
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-21-11 08:28 PM
Response to Original message |
4. No, I don't think groceries should be taxed at all. nt |
petronius
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-21-11 08:29 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Other: increase taxes on things that I don't buy to lower taxes on things that I do buy |
slackmaster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-21-11 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
16. That's a pretty good generic response! |
Forkboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-21-11 08:29 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Would you support a decrease in military funding to also decrease sales taxes on groceries? |
LoZoccolo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-21-11 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
10. It depends on which state is thinking of decreasing its state military budget. |
|
For a land-locked state like Wyoming, they might be able to do it with little or no problem. In Alaska, however, some people can see Russia from their house. The Alaska Army needs all the help that it can get in that tense situation.
|
Forkboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-21-11 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. One of your funnier posts, but you still managed to not answer my question. |
ejpoeta
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-21-11 08:33 PM
Response to Original message |
7. there is no tax on food here. i think if it is prepared food there is tax... |
|
personally i do not think these kinds of taxes are appropriate, but in the interest of at least spreading it to the most people i would say such a tax would be the most fair. these kinds of taxes.... like a sin tax.... i object to them mainly on the grounds that anyone could find almost anything to have negative health or well being effects and who gets to decide these things? it is often the poor that suffer these taxes more broadly than anyone else.
|
Codeine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-21-11 08:34 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Any tax on food is already madness. |
|
We don't tax unprepared food in California.
|
nebenaube
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-21-11 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. absolutely! taxing food is taking it from a baby's mouth. n/t |
blondeatlast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-21-11 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
15. AZ now taxes food. I can't believe I'm still in this hell, but I do so love the desert. nt |
flvegan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-21-11 08:57 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Wait...why soft drinks? |
|
The whole idea of tax on groceries aside, why tax soft drinks as opposed to something else?
|
slackmaster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-21-11 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
17. Because they're addicting, and people keep buying them even though they are low in nutritional value |
WinkyDink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-21-11 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
22. Then there's potato chips, and porn, and ice-cream, and gum, and Chapstick, and.... |
|
Edited on Thu Apr-21-11 09:58 PM by WinkyDink
|
slackmaster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-22-11 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #22 |
32. Porn, gum, and Chap-Sticks are already subject to sales tax in my state |
flvegan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-21-11 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
23. If we're going to tax consumable garbage... |
|
we're going to be here for a long LONG time figuring out what is what.
|
slackmaster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-22-11 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #23 |
33. I think we should STOP taxing tobacco and alcohol |
|
Government revenue should not be dependent on consumption of potentially harmful products.
|
shimmergal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-21-11 09:13 PM
Response to Original message |
13. I'd support a tax on every drink sold |
|
Edited on Thu Apr-21-11 09:14 PM by shimmergal
in six- and 12-packs and individual ready-to-go drinks, if it were specifically to finance a single-payer health care system.
My guess is that it would almost pay for it.
|
slackmaster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-21-11 09:15 PM
Response to Original message |
14. No. Neither soft drinks nor other groceries (food) are subject to sales tax here, and I oppose... |
|
...sin taxes in general. Government should never put itself in a position of being dependent on sales of harmful items for revenue.
|
SheilaT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-21-11 09:30 PM
Response to Original message |
18. I don't ever buy soft drinks, |
|
so I suppose I should support such a tax increase. However, these are state and/or local tax issues. I currently live in a state that does not tax groceries.
|
Modern_Matthew
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-21-11 09:35 PM
Response to Original message |
19. No. No taxes on groceries. Period. Proud to say my state doesn't do this. nt |
one_voice
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-21-11 09:39 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I've heard the "sin tax" argument, and I agree with a lot of it. BUT, taxing any food would hurt the poor and middle class the most. People are suffering enough, already worrying about putting food on the table, we shouldn't add to that.
|
WinkyDink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-21-11 09:55 PM
Response to Original message |
21. No. What's with the drive to single out this type of product? |
darkstar3
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-21-11 10:11 PM
Response to Original message |
24. No, for several specific reasons. |
|
1. Increasing sales taxes on any food item is bad for the common family. 2. Increasing any tax in order to lower another tax always leads to the tax cut being temporary. Just ask a Missourian about their highway taxes. 3. There is no evidence that soft drinks harm anyone other than the individual consumer, which means that the government really shouldn't have any interest in discouraging their consumption. 4. We have income taxes, property taxes, highway taxes, and many others. The most harmful tax to our economy and working classes is sales tax.
I'm sure in the next few hours I'll think of other reasons...
|
applegrove
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-21-11 10:31 PM
Response to Original message |
25. A value added tax really works well to pay government bills. If you spend all your |
|
money of food and rent you don't pay the tax and you get some money back from the government twice a year. If you send your kid to the mall with $100, $5 will go to tax.
|
Xithras
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-21-11 10:33 PM
Response to Original message |
26. Some states tax food? |
catabryna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-21-11 10:37 PM
Response to Original message |
27. Not for a sales tax decrease on groceries... |
|
but I might support it if it were directed toward health care.
|
Bluebear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-21-11 10:39 PM
Response to Original message |
28. I would support having the rich pay their fair share and leave soft drinks out of it. |
Canuckistanian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-21-11 10:40 PM
Response to Original message |
29. Why yes, yes, I would |
|
A worthy question. Thank you.
|
cali
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-22-11 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #29 |
35. do you realize that many states don't tax groceries? |
Johonny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-21-11 11:02 PM
Response to Original message |
30. I think we should tax gold instead |
Rowdyboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-21-11 11:04 PM
Response to Original message |
31. I think its an exceptional idea and would support it in a heartbeat |
cali
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-22-11 07:32 AM
Response to Original message |
34. No sales tax on groceries in my state. I think it's sick shit to tax groceries. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:55 PM
Response to Original message |