The New York Times’ Disappearing Birther Scoop
April 22, 2011 10:01 am ET by Eric Boehlert
From the New York Times article that appeared on the newspaper’s website Thursday morning, came this passage:
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/22/us/politics/22republicans.html?_r=1&hpA plurality of Republican voters, 47 percent, said they believed Mr. Obama, who was born in Hawaii, was born in another country; 22 percent said they did not know where he was born, and 32 percent said they believed he was born in the United States.
But note that there were two peculiar things about how the Times handled the revelation.
First, in the original article, the newspaper completely buried the birther lede. Rather than highlighting the blockbuster poll finding, the Times gave the embarrassing news only a glancing reference and stuck the results deep down in the story, devoting just two sentences to the birther revelation. Sidestepping the thorny issue, the Times instead pegged the news story around the fact that Republican voters aren’t enthusiastic about their possible White House candidates. (Hint: That’s not exactly breaking news.)
Second,
the much-talked about birther passage from the Times’ polling piece soon disappeared; it was removed from the original article, without explaination. Readers now clicking on the Times link, which continues to whip around the Internet, aren’t informed that a plurality of Republicans believe Obama was born in a foreign country. In fact, readers aren’t told anything about those results. (A different article in the Times today makes a passing reference to the poll’s findings.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/22/us/politics/22birthers.html?src=un&feedurl=http://json8.nytimes.com/pages/national/index.jsonp )
http://mediamatters.org/blog/201104220006
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
