Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ElBaradei suggests war crimes probe of Bush team

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 06:50 PM
Original message
ElBaradei suggests war crimes probe of Bush team
"We're still evaluating how we're going to approach the whole issue of interrogations, detentions, and so forth. And obviously we're going to be looking at past practices and I don't believe that anybody is above the law. On the other hand I also have a belief that we need to look forward as opposed to looking backwards." - President Obama

=====

Former chief U.N. nuclear inspector Mohamed ElBaradei suggests in a new memoir that Bush administration officials should face international criminal investigation for the "shame of a needless war" in Iraq.

Freer to speak now than he was as an international civil servant, the Nobel-winning Egyptian accuses U.S. leaders of "grotesque distortion" in the run-up to the 2003 Iraq invasion, when then-President George W. Bush and his lieutenants claimed Iraq possessed doomsday weapons despite contrary evidence collected by ElBaradei's and other arms inspectors inside the country.

He tells of an October 2002 meeting he and Blix had with Secretary of State Colin Powell, National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice and others, at which the Americans sought to convert the U.N. mission into a "cover for what would be, in essence, a United States-directed inspection process." The U.N. officials resisted, and their teams went on to conduct some 700 inspections of scores of potential weapons sites in Iraq, finding no evidence to support the U.S. claims of weapons of mass destruction...

"I was aghast at what I was witnessing," ElBaradei writes of the official U.S. attitude before the March 2003 invasion, which he calls "aggression where there was no imminent threat," a war in which he accepts estimates that hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians were killed.

http://www.smirkingchimp.com/news/35707/elbaradei-suggests-war-crimes-probe-of-bush-team
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Send the whole lot to the Hague to be tried for war crimes.
Then lock them up and throw away the key.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. World history will not be kind to the Bush administration.
As we descend into a 2nd world nation, other nations will be bolder in their policies/attitude against this country's early 21st century naked resource grab in the ME.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. World history will not be kind to America overall
I've been reading Zinn's History of the American People recently. It's nothing like I was taught in school. The victors write the history and we will not be the victors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. + 1,000 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. I can support this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Permanut Donating Member (477 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. Maybe we should do this with others as well...
Edited on Fri Apr-22-11 07:25 PM by Permanut
For example, Ted Bundy was prosecuted for crimes that were in the past; looking backward, so to speak. Other examples would be easy to find.

(on edit) that is to say, we shouldn't prosecute anybody for anything that happened in the past.


:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
8. knr n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
9. Works for me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
10. OBVIOUSLY THE RULE OF LAW IS GONE
sry caps, just frustrated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC