Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nobel peace drones - Glenn Greenwald

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 11:28 PM
Original message
Nobel peace drones - Glenn Greenwald
Edited on Fri Apr-22-11 11:33 PM by slipslidingaway
http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2011/04/22/drone/index.html

A U.S. drone attack in Pakistan killed 23 people this morning, and this is how The New York Times described that event in its headline and first paragraph:


...When I saw that, I was going to ask how the NYT could possibly know that the people whose lives the U.S. just ended were "militants," but then I read further in the article and it said this: "A government official in North Waziristan told Pakistani reporters that five children and four women were among the 23 who were killed." So at least 9 of the 23 people we killed -- at least -- were presumably not "militants" at all, but rather innocent civilians (contrast how the NYT characterizes Libya’s attacks in its headlines: "Qaddafi Troops Fire Cluster Bombs Into Civilian Areas").

...

Beyond that, isn't it painfully obvious that however many “militants” we're killing, we're creating more and more all the time? How many family members, friends, neighbors and villagers of the "five children and four women" we just killed are now consumed with new levels of anti-American hatred? How many Pakistani adolescents who hear about these latest killings are now filled with an eagerness to become "militants"?

...Finally, when the OLC released its rationale for why the President was permitted to involve the U.S in Libya without Congressional approval, its central claim was that -- due the very limited nature of our involvement and the short duration -- this does not "constitute[] a 'war' within the meaning of the Declaration of War Clause" (Adam Serwer has more on this reasoning). Now that our involvement has broadened to include drone attacks weeks into this conflict, with no end in sight, can we agree that the U.S. is now fighting a "war" and that this therefore requires Congressional approval?

* * * * *

A new NYT/CBS poll today finds that only 39% approve of Obama's handling of Libya, while 45% disapprove (see p. 17). That's what happens when a President starts a new war without any pretense of democratic debate, let alone citizenry consent through the Congress."








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. If a 'Super Power' occupied the US to establish a different type of government...
Edited on Fri Apr-22-11 11:33 PM by Mimosa
Our people would probably resist.

The violence of these wars is causing grief, depression and anger in millions! of families in the Middle East. Imagine living in villages torn apart by wars. Imagine seeing the armed occupiers and hearing the helicopters loudly whirring overhead all the time. I learned -to a slight degree- what it must be like to live under military occupation in the weeks after Katrina when Humvees with armed US kid troops were rolling all about New Orleans. And the noises, the constant noises, of the helicopter blades overhead added to stress, not to mention the 'checkpoints'.

Such stress can drive the occupiers and the occupied insane. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I cannot even imagine what the stress must be like for families living in these ...
Edited on Fri Apr-22-11 11:39 PM by slipslidingaway
areas for months and years, guess the only consolation is that the helicopters and planes did not have live ammunition and were not dropping bombs on you.

:(





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truth2power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-23-11 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. You are empathetic, mimosa. Just the fact that you say,
"Imagine living..." or "Imagine seeing..." tells me that. You're part of a vanishing breed, I fear.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
axollot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-24-11 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #12
28. Empathy is what the GOP/RW/Fascist bastards lack. Progressives
from every background - the very wealthy to the very poor have empathy for others. Just like Ayn Randian ideologues find in her books justification to be selfish, greedy, monstrous people. Progressives, cannot stand an unjust world where others are treated poorly.

Cheers
Sandy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. kr kr kr
Edited on Fri Apr-22-11 11:51 PM by inna
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GomezLives Donating Member (256 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-23-11 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
4. How do we know the Pakistani govt. official wasnt lying??
We really dont.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-23-11 04:58 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. No, you're right. So let's continue to ignore the warmongering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonperson Donating Member (901 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-23-11 05:42 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Recent experience in Iraq and Afghanistan for starters
Not to mention Vietnam.

Contrary to what our government and military leaders would have us believe, missiles fired from drones don't have names on them and they do indeed kill the innocent along with so-called militants. Or do you really believe those images of "smart" bombs being dropped down chimneys killing only the bad guys?

Think about this for a second. If your town was under air attack do you really believe only "militants" would be killed by the falling bombs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-23-11 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
21. Welcome to DU :) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
axollot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-24-11 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #7
29. Welcome to DU! We need more like you and less like the poster
you're responding too. I am so sick of people finding justification for our actions overseas! I've said the same thing even before we "shock and awed" Iraq. That the Iraqi's will fight back, not welcome us! And to my friends on the right and the few on the left that supported our unjust occupation I told them "how would you feel if another country came in and took out OUR leaders, whether they were just or unjust?" The answer always was "they would pick up a gun and defend their country" What the hell do they expect these folks to do?

It's long past time that Dear Leader stood up to the powers that be and TOLD THE AMERICAN PEOPLE what he is up against - that is, if he has ever been against this sort of behavior and is actually under pressure by the MIC and WS.

Cheers
Sandy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truth2power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-23-11 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. Of course. They COULD be lying...
But I wonder why your first response would be that perhaps it's a lie.

Haven't we all seen enough pictures of Afghans, Iraqis, etc. cradling the bloody remains of their children, to know that that's what the American government does? They kill women and children and other innocents.

Have you ever thought - I mean really thought, what it would be like to gather up the PIECES of your child because some foreign army invaded your country in the service of the great-god oil??

Probably not.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
axollot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-24-11 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #13
30. Mate, I sure have - I cried as I cradled my 7mo pregnant stomach
when bombs dropped on Baghdad. March 2003, my daughter will be 8 in May. (2 older children; 21 and 17 and about to be a grandmother). This is not the world I want them to inherit.
I fear our time will come, and it will be much worse than 9/11 at least they didnt target kids. Mostly commuter planes into mostly empty buildings w/adults in them. Not towns w/schools and Day-Cares.

*weeps for what we have become, under Obama - it makes it that much worse, because I DO expect better from him*

Cheers
Sandy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-23-11 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. We know, because it has been verified, that drones are killing
civilians at a rate of at least, 10 civilians, to every one supposed 'terrorist'. Both the governments of Pakistan and Afghanistan have demanded an end to the killing of civilians by drones.

Most civilized people in the world have called for these cowardly, killers to be banned totally.

Let's keep ignoring millions of people asking for an end to these killings! That's how to end 'terrorism'. :sarcasm:

The world now views the U.S. as the biggest threat to World Peace. I don't think there are too many people anymore who believe a word THIS government has to say. THAT is the harm that has been done to this country by warmongering liars.

I find it despicable that there is anyone in THIS country who defend the murder of even one innocent child by these brutal, cruel and cowardly weapons.

But we are paying a heavy price for all of it! We are simply no longer respected or trusted, anywhere. And that will diminish our power. The world is rapidly changing, in South America, in Africa and the ME and what this country is being told is 'stay out of our business'. We have caused heartache and suffering to millions of human beings over the past several decades, and now they have had enough. Our support for the world's worst dictators, our illegal invasions and theft of resources, it was bound to come to an end sooner or later.

We did think when Obama was elected, that those necessary changes would begin. Instead he has only enhanced Bush's policies and expanded them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-24-11 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #4
24. ........
:thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Northerner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-23-11 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
5. K&R nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-23-11 06:49 AM
Response to Original message
8. K & R
Sickening
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-23-11 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
9. K&R. If this keeps up, a fourth term for George W Bush may be in jeopardy.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-23-11 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. Thanks for the knr's :) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-23-11 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
11. Obama did not deserve that award. The Nobel Committee
should have waited to see if he acted in such a way as to earn it. He had not had an opportunity to win it to that point. I doubt he would get it now. It was a slam at Bush I presume.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truth2power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-23-11 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. If I know anything at all, I know he did not deserve that award. But I continue
to wonder what their reasoning was. Can't figure it out.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-23-11 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. Agreed, other than a slam at Bush, which it was, still wonder why the committee...
gave him this award. He had already stated that he planned to escalate the war in Afghanistan.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-23-11 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
15. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-23-11 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
16. Slate magazine had an article about drone warfare a few months ago.

Ban Drone-Porn War Crimes

http://www.slate.com/id/2265655/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-23-11 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Thanks for that link ...
snip ...

"...Back in the USA, we learned at the end of August that a Navy test of a new model drone had gone awry earlier in the month because of a "software issue." The Navy's own special "Fire Scout" test drone had gotten out of control of the drone-porn jockeys who were remote-piloting it in the vicinity of Patuxent, Md. The drone started wandering erratically toward—and then through—protected Washington, D.C., airspace. It looked like we might be attacked by our own drone! Control was regained before the drone could do any damage. But the episode at least suggested a better name than the straight-arrow "Fire Scout," such a wimpy name compared to "Ambassador of Death." How about "Ambassador of DUI"?

Seriously though, it was almost as if we needed a dramatic reminder of the drone problem: as if the Ambassador of DUI had been summoned by the guilt of the collective unconscious to remind us, "Hey, Washington, time to start giving some thought to the whole war-crime thing with the drones."

There has been some valuable reporting on the subject, notably by Jane Mayer in The New Yorker and by the legendary Nat Hentoff; Wired's Nathan Hodge and Noah Schactman have covered the war crimes issue; Tara McKelvey has kept track of drone developments and previously adumbrated the split in the military boy's club between COIN, the cult of counterinsurgency (the cult of Petraeus and McChrystal actually), which believes in "nation building" and "population protection"—long-war tactics will wear down insurgencies—and the rival cult of counterterrorism that says forget population protection; drone killing is quicker and cheaper.

In fact, if you ask me, neither will work, since we lack the time and will for nation building, even if it were doable, while the "counterterrorist" drones may well create more terrorists than they kill. Americans have a penchant for believing there is a solution to every big problem—"solutionism" it's been called. But here all the options are infeasible or bad. And so naturally we avert our eyes and hope the whole thing will go away..."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-24-11 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #20
25. the "rogue drone" in the USA is a good read...sad read..but,
if it happened here, imagine "rogues" gone errant in all of the countries we invaded. Collateral damage would be heavy. So many innocents killed...and for what.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crickets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-23-11 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
18. K&R
Edited on Sat Apr-23-11 07:50 PM by crickets
Now that our involvement has broadened to include drone attacks weeks into this conflict, with no end in sight, can we agree that the U.S. is now fighting a "war" and that this therefore requires Congressional approval?

I'll agree, for all the good it will do. Once there was some sort of coalition with a foot in the Libyan door, anybody with any sense of recent history could see we would get around to killing people. How long before we have boots on the ground (other than the CIA 'teams') and another round of base building, hmm? It would be a sick joke to finally get troops out of Iraq only to see them sent to yet another war.


edit: spelling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-23-11 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. It surely would be a sick joke and I hope it does not come to that...
we're still building bases in Afghanistan that will not be done until sometime later this year.

But we need to look forward and cut entitlement spending :(

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-24-11 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #22
26. K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-23-11 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
23. K&+R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
axollot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-24-11 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
27. kick. Sickening. And then here at home they want to hurt seniors
and disabled by taking away medicare. Say it loud and tell anyone who challenges about the deficit that it would be much less if we were not spending 8 BILLION DOLLARS A MONTH ON 3 WARS!

Enough. It was too early into Obama's presidency to hand him a Nobel Prize for peace - I had hoped, it would change that he would remain the President he campaigned to be. Is he still better than a GOP dictator? Hell yes. But stale bread from a rubbish bin is also better than starving....

Cheers
Sandy
With the empire falling - and it IS falling - beware of the GOP Govs acting as dictators and pushing out the Federal Government. I just cannot stress this enough, we'll become and truly becoming "Banana States; A Republic once United" and that my friends is by design.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BetsysGhost Donating Member (176 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-24-11 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
31. hollow words
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-24-11 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
32. It is absolutely disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earcandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-11 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
33. I got a feeling US is trying to kill all of the suicide clones made from sperm banks and
birthed in the secret hills of Pakistan.... made from drug
money, raised in cages, groomed to die the great death... can
we find the training films they brainwashed them with?  we can
use that to track the drug money made in Afghan to the pyscho
who staged the births.... 

maybe that is what the "birther" syndrome is all
about... a freudian slip?  a guilt trip projected....?  those
repukes are stage 4 presenters of disasters all over the
world... 

regarding weather and earthquake problems, check out HAARP.
What those satelites and submarines up to.... find the clues
,,,it might be this simple, and made to appear miraculous or
grandiose by projecting those 3D gods in the sky....staging
technological platforms on self destruct.  

root out the evil and don't put any pretense above these
guys... they are sick puppies.  
time to put them to rest in some cages of their own... with
free egg tosses to all. 
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 05:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC