Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ethics Panel May Still Rebuke Ensign

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-23-11 08:43 AM
Original message
Ethics Panel May Still Rebuke Ensign


Ethics Panel May Still Rebuke Ensign

* By Steven T. Dennis
* Roll Call Staff
* April 22, 2011, 3:18 p.m.


Sen. John Ensign’s abrupt resignation spares him the spectacle of public hearings airing the details surrounding his affair with a former aide, but the Ethics Committee appears likely to publicly rebuke his conduct nonetheless.

Ethics Committee Chairman Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) and Vice Chairman Johnny Isakson (R-Ga.) issued a brief but telling joint statement Thursday night saying that the Nevada Republican made the “right decision” to resign, but also making clear that they would wrap up their work in a “timely” fashion after an exhaustive 22-month inquiry.

The ethics panel loses its ability to formally discipline Ensign after his resignation takes effect May 3, but can still issue a public report on his conduct, or refer its findings to law enforcement if the panel believes a crime may have been committed.


more...

http://www.rollcall.com/news/ethics_panel_may_still_rebuke_ensign-205100-1.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-23-11 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. 22 months wasted on this BS? Really?
Republic "Family Values" are costing us wayyyy too much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-23-11 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. Is this a late April Fools joke?
A REPUBLICAN actually being accountable? By his peers, no less? I'll believe it when I see it. More likely, he'll get a cushy lobbying job and his own show on Fox.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-23-11 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
3. Weren't laws broken? Wasn't there a $96,000 bribe involved?
Wasn't there also illegal lobbying, illegal contributions, and illegal hiring?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC