Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MI Sen. Caswell (foster-kids-in-used-clothing fame) wants legislature to be part-time (ALEC idea)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-23-11 09:44 AM
Original message
MI Sen. Caswell (foster-kids-in-used-clothing fame) wants legislature to be part-time (ALEC idea)
Bruce Caswell is the mean-spirited idiot who thinks foster children should be able to buy only used clothing. Here's a link to the LBN topic about that terrible idea of his:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x4824045

He's also proposing amending the Michigan constitution to make the legislature part-time rather than full-time:

http://www.lenconnect.com/news/x802140549/Sen-Bruce-Caswells-proposal-seeks-to-make-state-Legislature-part-time

I haven't been able to find anything yet to connect him directly to ALEC -- they don't reveal all their members, and legislators are becoming warier of admitting they belong to ALEC.

But before I read about Caswell's proposed amendment, I'd seen the idea of a part-time legislature for Michigan floated in a Michigan newspaper opinion piece co-written by an ALEC task force director. Here's a link to the DU topic about that

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x910989

and it's also linked to from the long compilation topic on the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) (reply 231 there).

As I mentioned in the separate topic about the opinion piece, most of the arguments it made were the familiar ones from ALEC, but there was a new one that stood out:

This op-ed piece makes several of ALEC's usual arguments, and one that's new to me (and that I can't find in "Rich States, Poor States").

The usual arguments are against unions, against the minimum wage, and against corporate income tax, and in favor of lower personal income taxes.

The new item is the suggestion that states do better if the state legislatures are only part-time and have small staffs (hence lower costs).

Of course part-time state legislators with small staffs have even more need of convenient "model legislation" of the sort ALEC offers.

So ALEC not only wants to increase the power of state governments vis-a-vis both the federal government and local governments, they'd also like to reduce the ability of state legislators to focus on problems in their own individual states -- which increases ALEC's influence.



Caswell's bill was introduced just a few days before that opinion piece appeared. Since it was co-authored by that ALEC task force director and three members of the staff of Koch-funded Northwood University (and would have likely taken more time to complete because of that), it's hard to believe there wasn't coordination between ALEC and Caswell.

As the newspaper article about Caswell introducing this bill points out, the MI Senate minority leader is opposed to the change:

http://www.lenconnect.com/news/x802140549/Sen-Bruce-Caswells-proposal-seeks-to-make-state-Legislature-part-time

“Our state has serious problems right now, and creating a part-time Legislature will only exacerbate the problem. The residents and local communities of Michigan have seen drastic cuts proposed by Gov. (Rick) Snyder’s budget to police and fire, their pensions and their unemployment benefits. Enacting a part-time Legislature would have little effect on budgetary savings and could potentially lead to greater executive power.”


But that would suit ALEC just fine, as long as the GOP continues to control legislatures and governorships. After all, ALEC has cookie-cutter legislation for all the issues they consider important...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-23-11 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. Not a good idea
a part-time republican legislature would limit the amount of damage to society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crickets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-23-11 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. When will someone finally call this by its real name:
insanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-23-11 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. However, I'm sure he'll insist on full-time pay. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-23-11 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
4. Indiana only has a part-time legislature
and has had it for a long time. I'm not sure exactly whether it's better that way or not. I can't recall an instance, at least here in Indiana, where it's been for the better or for the worst. OTOH some governors (i.e. Walker, Snyder) aren't quite as restrained as Governor Daniels has generally been since he's been in office. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnyawl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-23-11 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Washington State has a part time legislature also...


...I can't say for sure that we're doing any better or worse then a state with a full time leg.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC