Lyric
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-26-11 06:15 PM
Original message |
The Medicare vouchers thing--it's not really going to happen, right? |
|
Up until now I've just been assuming that this was just another example of the typical right-wing MO: propose something so outrageous that later on, your slightly-less-outrageous "compromise" proposal seems sane in comparison. But so many people are discussing this as if it might seriously happen.
They can't REALLY do that, can they?
|
bluestateguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-26-11 06:18 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I doubt it could even get 50 votes in the Senate, much less 60 |
|
Susan Collins is already said she is a No.
|
Gman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-26-11 06:18 PM
Response to Original message |
|
There's zero (that's a big goose egg) chance of it passing.
|
TheWraith
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-26-11 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
23. Bingo. Absolutely no chance, period, ever. |
|
This is Republican mental masturbation.
|
OHdem10
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-26-11 06:19 PM
Response to Original message |
3. It all depends on how many Democrats in Senate are willing |
|
to vote with the Republicans on this.
|
Proud Liberal Dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-26-11 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
I would actually love to see Reid hold a vote on this. Betcha we see Repubs scramble to prevent a vote from ever happening. This plan is already turning toxic for the GOP. I would think that the last thing most of them would want hanging around their necks in 2012 is this *plan*. :puke:
|
craigmatic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-26-11 06:21 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Nope Obama would probably veto it if it gets that far. *fingers crossed* |
Lyric
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-26-11 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
20. See, that's what I'm hoping. |
|
I just hope that whatever "compromise" they reach to avoid this doesn't hurt as almost as badly.
|
Sky Masterson
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-26-11 06:22 PM
Response to Original message |
5. It would be political suicide |
|
I think they love their jobs and money way too much to do that. :) :hi:
|
pnwmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-26-11 06:26 PM
Response to Original message |
7. They can't do it if a Democratic President is in office. n/t |
pnwmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-26-11 06:28 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Who would have thought Gov. Walker would be dismantling unions? |
|
They are going to try HARD to end both Medicare and Social Security. This has been a dream of the party ever since Ronald Reagan.
We have to take it very very seriously.
|
Telly Savalas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-26-11 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
21. Ronald Reagan was dismantling unions 30 years ago |
|
Gov. Walker's actions really aren't that big a surprise.
Dismantling Medicare, in contrast, is something that wasn't really on anybody's radars until Ryan's plan. If political discourse continues to trend towards stupid over the next decade this may emerge as a threat, but there's no chance the current government will pass a Medicare voucher plan, and any claim to the contrary only distorts the assessment of our political environment thereby undermining our ability to tackle the current set of threats.
|
TheCowsCameHome
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-26-11 06:35 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Call these RW fools out - do you support Medicare vouchers, or not? |
|
Political suicide can be a thing of beauty.
|
WinkyDink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-26-11 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
16. I'd prefer not using the "school choice" term of "vouchers;" it has a positive ring to too many. |
|
"Do you favor forcing Seniors to buy their medical insurance?"
|
edhopper
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-26-11 06:38 PM
Response to Original message |
|
if they regain the Senate in 2012. All bets are off. I would not think that they would renew the devastating Bush Tax cuts, with Obama's approval. I did not think they would allow the Financial institution to behave exactly they same way that brought about the crisis, but they did. I did not think they could turn the wreckage that Wall Street left on the State budgets and pension funds on the backs of teachers and workers, but they did. Don't count on it not happening.
|
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-26-11 06:43 PM
Response to Original message |
11. This will never pass in the Senate. |
|
I'm looking forward to seeing how many lily-livered Repuke Senators vote no though.:)
|
leftstreet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-26-11 06:45 PM
Response to Original message |
12. It's a great way to keep forcing Single Payer out of the national debate |
rurallib
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-26-11 06:46 PM
Response to Original message |
13. not as long as the good Dems hold some power, BUT}}}} |
|
in 2012 if we lose the senate and the presidency and the pugs retain the house THEN}}}}}} well it has been target #2 for decades for the repugs behind SS and right there with killing unions.
|
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-26-11 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
14. There's no way in hell a repuke will win the WH in 2012. |
|
And after this bullshit with Medicare, SS and Medicaid, I wouldn't be surprised if the Teabaggers aren't kicked to the curb either. He could very easily take back the House and gain seats in the Senate. This one the dumbest fucking move the Repukes could have made.
|
AndyTiedye
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-26-11 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
15. All They Have to do is Keep Raising Gas Prices and they Win |
|
Edited on Tue Apr-26-11 07:30 PM by AndyTiedye
It's that simple.
And if they win, we lose Medicare, Social Security, whatever is left of the safety net, Roe v. Wade, Griswold v. Connecticut, and everything else.
|
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-27-11 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
24. Repukes = BIG OIL. I think people are finally catching on to what the |
|
repuke party is all about: Union busting, destroy Medicare, destroy SS, destroy medicaid, destroy public education and have your friends at BP, Exxon, Shell and Chevron make the Dems look bad by raising the prices. EVERYONE knows the repukes are in the pocket of big oil and they line each others pockets. Big Oil is just thanking the repukes for their HUGE tax breaks and HUGE refunds by raising prices for them.
Their game is over. They've shown their true colors.
|
rurallib
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-26-11 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
22. when they own the media, idiot ideas disappear down the memory hole |
|
quickly to be replaced by hate and blame for the Dems. They have tons and tons of money. They is already talk that they will buy up all commercial time in the US next yea. Couple that with friendly, friendly shows and VOILA! disappearing democrats.
|
Historic NY
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-26-11 07:49 PM
Response to Original message |
17. Well if there was a Republican Senate majority it would be happening... |
|
the only thing standing in it way is the slim majority of Democrats in the Senate.
|
Arkana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-26-11 08:31 PM
Response to Original message |
18. No. We still hold the Senate and the White House |
|
and the President would never sign this abomination if it by chance landed on his desk, no matter what you may think of him.
|
Spinny Liberal
(120 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-26-11 08:36 PM
Response to Original message |
19. It will probably be DOA in the Senate |
|
If not, Obama would never sign it.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:56 AM
Response to Original message |