Now would be a good time for Sarah to clear up

[fried eggs]

Confusion regarding her grandson /son /step son's birth. Unlike the other Birthers, I will consider the matter resolved the moment the birth certificate is released.

[Blue_In_AK]

1. Last night I posted an excellent blog entry from ProgressiveAlaska

about this very subject. http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x968203

I remain "Trignostic," as Phil puts it, but I do believe Sarah needs to quit lying about her having produced Trig's birth certificate. She hasn't, she never has, but the media just takes her at her word.

[frebrd]

4. I honestly didn't know what "Sarah" you were talking about.......

until I got down into the text of your post. Hadn't thought about her in days.

It was wonderful!

Edited to add:

Sorry, meant to reply to the OP.

[Blue_In_AK]

5. I hear ya.

I go for days without thinking about her, too, but she just keeps popping up.

[Scuba]

2. Welcome to DU

[Old and In the Way]

3. Full disclosure is only for Democrats.

We're told not to expect that from Republicans because it will make us look silly. We wouldn't want to look silly, would we? But I don't care about Trig's BC, he's not a potential POTUS candidate (maybe he'll be nominated by Republicans in 35 years or so, who knows?)...but I do believe Ms. Palin needs to release her medical complete records if she runs - who knows what she might be hiding?

[hardcover]

6. Good grief

Proof of birth is required to run for president. Proof of children is not. Trash talk doesn't promote our cause. Let's try to sound intelligent here.

[gateley]

7. Good --adult -- point. But it would feel good to make her squirm. Human nature. nt

[kestrel91316]

8. So, you support the current double standard, with its basis in blatant racism?

Ok. Duly noted. Enjoy your stay.

[hardcover]

11. I'm saying we need to talk intelligently here.

Questioning his birth has nothing to do with race and it's a turn-off to independents to say that it is racist. How do we want to appear to independents who read here? Do we really want people to read us making race out of something that is not and manufacturing garbage about a woman who is not really even significant? Why do you waste your time on crap like that?

[DCKit]

9. Proof of her not having committed fraud would go a long way in legitimizing her ongoing...

involvement in politics and the news cycle.

[PeaceNikki]

10. I look forward to the day when a woman's reproductive system is not a point of public debate.

I won't be holding my breath, however.

[Blue_In_AK]

12. Her reproruductive system

is secondary to her lies about it.