Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Speaking of carnival barkers & crocks-of shit***

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 01:27 PM
Original message
Speaking of carnival barkers & crocks-of shit***
Edited on Wed Apr-27-11 01:28 PM by kpete
5) Speaking of carnival barkers: Every member of the political press knows that the chance of
On the Birth Certificate Idiocracy
APR 27 2011, 12:56 PM ET
James Fallows

..............


2) Language alert. This alone disproves Donald Trump's crock-of-shit*** insulting and preposterous assertions that Obama was an affirmative action or charity admittee to the Ivy Leagues who couldn't really cut it on his own IQ or test scores, as if there weren't already evidence enough: It is his use at time 0:50 of the word "bemusement" in its proper sense (puzzlement, confusion) rather than what most people think it means (mild amusement). I would like to have someone ask Trump what he thinks the word means. Maybe some variant on "easement"? (*** Update: OK, it's a sign of defeat to resort to profanity. That's a sign of how I felt about this line of slurs. First, whatever is wrong with Obama, no sane person thinks he's stupid. Second, I wonder how many people think Donald Trump is in a position to judge Obama's smarts. Third, there is no avoiding the racist connotation of saying that a successful black person got there -- wink wink -- through special treatment. "Of course the black guy ended up as editor of the Law Review. That's how it is these days." So I should just have said that rather than "crock of shit.")


...............

Donald Trump becoming the 45th President of the United States is zero. I say that the chance of Sarah Palin becoming president is extremely low but greater than zero. I will take any bet at any odds against Trump becoming president, for reasons I'll boil down to this: the same circumstances that would make Obama so vulnerable that a Trump could beat him (economic, political, military, or social chaos of any kind you want to imagine), would simultaneously motivate the Republican party to choose a "real" candidate with the best chance of winning the election and running the government. That is, if the Republicans think they have a serious chance to win, they're not going to blow that chance with Trump.

My real point is: knowing for sure that Trump's "lead" in the GOP polls now is a quaint artifact of name recognition, and knowing that there is no chance that his "colorful" background and prima donna manner could stand the long grueling, humiliating ordeal of the primaries and the caucuses and the endless interviews, how long will the press keep acting as the megaphone for this carnival barker? Why aren't they jumping all over him now, for the patent idiocy of his "birther" claim, rather than acting as if somehow he has scored a point by making Obama react? In reality, he'll be on the stage with the press' megaphone until people get bored with him -- which gradually but undeniably has happened to Palin.

the rest:
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/04/on-the-birth-certificate-idiocracy/237941/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. The republican establishment don't know whether to shit or go blind
They realize the more trump blurts out his line of crap the more popular he becomes with the lunatic fringe (aka republican primary voters).

They would love for him to STFU but they don't want to say so and piss off the crazies, because they think trump is fully capable of a third party run and he'd take half their voters with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. In that case, I say we back off completely and let him have at it.
Regardless, there are several HUGE egos hoping for the Republic nomination. I would expect at least two of them to run (I) campaigns when they aren't selected to lead their party.

Hilarity will ensue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC