Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WooHoo! Cenk is spanking some douchebag from World Nut Daily.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 05:26 PM
Original message
WooHoo! Cenk is spanking some douchebag from World Nut Daily.
The CLAIMS to be a legit journalist as opposed to MSNBC and the "Soros-backed" Media Matters! :rofl:

The guy won't acknowledge that O's Birth Cert is legit until they "examine it", Cenk says "You've had all day!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. That was a blast!
Now he is redefining a natural born citizen. Oh gosh I was rolling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. I love Cenk's "Crazy Train" ...
All aboard!

Choo! Choo!

He made Joseph Farrah look like the lunatic that ... actually he really does look like a lunatic with the gray hair and the dark brown mustache and eyebrows.

The MSNBC shows have been just great this afternoon -- I've been quite amused at the drubbing the teabaggers and birthers are receiving at the hands of Matthews and Ugar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. That was great n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. that shit was too funny
I'm still laughing about it.

ALL ABOARD!! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. unrecced for use of "douchebag" which is obnoxious and sexist
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. ....but completely accurate in this case
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DontTreadOnMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. +1 rec for using the word "douchebag"
I think the word aptly fits in this case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. and I added another
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. And I added another. It's a perfect word to describe these people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. moi aussi. j'aime beaucoup le mot ''douche.''
Vive la France!

ahhhh haaaaa; looky here....first thing that came up when I googled
'douchebag of liberty'

it came from.....

DU!!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flashmann Donating Member (30 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Rec
Another rec for douchebag.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Welcome to DU! (Un-hide your profile, I'm only guessing you're new here.) nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. I feel I can use the term since I use the item, being a (non-sexist) woman. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. So its not ok to offend transgender people at DU but its fine to offend women.
Don't even bother trying to explain that to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. I'm a woman and I'm not offended which is why I used the word. You don't speak for
all of us, as evidenced by some of the rec's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. No, I speak only for myself.
But its amazing how many people would rather I not speak at all when I voice my opinion on this.

Lots of hostility on a difference of opinon over a word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. You're right - you're entitled to your opinion. I over-react when I think someone
is accusing me of being sexist (on DU, for some reason, a lot of people seem to think I'm a guy --probably because of my language
:7). Sorry if I offended you - really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. I wish there were a way to unrec a post.
I think the term douchebag (which by definition is an inanimate object that is neither male nor female gender, much like like saying a doorknob is sexist) is perfectly appropriate and it is obnoxious to scream "sexist" where none was intended or implied.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. I think its pretty clear that the intended meaning is feminine
and that it wouldn't make sense to use it as an insult if it were not.

And if you find yourself so upset that another DUer has a difference of opinion over the use of a word that you would disallow her the right to be offended, then I question whether you are really tolerant enough to call yourself a 'liberal'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Talk to the gender-neutral hand.
I'll save my outrage for things that have meaning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. ok then. he's a colostomy bag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Now that would be gender neutral and insulting.
Edited on Wed Apr-27-11 07:06 PM by undeterred
Although I suspect someone who depends on a colostomy bag because they needed a bowel resection or have inflammatory bowel disease wouldn't find it so funny. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chemp Donating Member (569 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
30. I prefer "Douche Nozzle" actually
It's found in the tilt of the neck...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
16. He just got Ron Paul to say some pretty wild stuff.
I always enjoy watching intelligent people with spine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Cenk was outstanding with both of them. Too many of the "hosts" ask the question
and move on to the next one once they receive a response. They don't LISTEN and they don't ENGAGE. Cenk just keeps getting better. :7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Agree. Or, like Tweety, they talk over the guest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
18. I wonder if it was the same sack of Summer's Eve that I heard on the BBC this morning. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreatCaesarsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
21. Will WND come up with the $15,000 it promised
to give to the hospital where Obama was born?

I wouldn't bet on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
24. one of the most virulent scuz buckets you could ever want to encounter
"The Vincent Foster Factory"

1996, Columbia Journalism Review published an article called "The Vincent Foster Factory," detailing the role played by Joseph Farah, then head of the Western Journalism Center, in promoting conspiracy theories surrounding the death of Clinton White House counsel Vince Foster. It states:

One of the Center's major activities is trying to inject the dark view of Foster's death into mainstream reporting and thinking. Last year, to this end, the Center bought full-page ads in several major newspapers, including The New York Times, to showcase Ruddy's work and to offer for sale special Vince Foster reports, including a compilation of Ruddy's stories, titled "The Ruddy Investigation," for $12, and a forty-minute "riveting new video documentary" titled "Unanswered -- The Death of Vincent Foster," which Ruddy helped produce, and which goes for $35


Sound familiar? That's the same playbook -- promotion, conspiracies and selling trinkets to true believers -- Farah is running against Barack Obama on the birth certificate conspiracy.

As he did back then, Farah insisted his work isn't partisan. In 1996, Farah claimed the WJC was merely "a vigorous watchdog on government"; on July 29, he asserted that "this is not a left-right issue. This is not a conservative-liberal issue. This is not a Democrat-Republican issue. This is not an ideological issue. This is a matter of what's true and what's not."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/terry-krepel/joseph-farahs-birther-fac_b_253610.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #24
31. WingNut Daily Is A Major Scam...
Thank you for bringing back the WJC...which was funded by Richard Mellon-Scaife who is the money behind Wingnut Daily. That's the drill...start a rumor/conspiracy, pepper the corporate media through books (pushed up the best seller lists by bulk buys) hate radio and talking heads on the cables. In the 90s this was just getting off the ground, today its a "mighty wurlitzer" that has spread all sorts of lies and distortions.

Farrah is one of the biggest slime buckets and a regular on C-SPIN and sadly gets credibility with the stenographer crowd so that when someone like a Cenk takes him down (and it was a joy to see that) it's seen as being "partisan" rather than exposing a fraud.

Cheers...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
27. Recced for Cenk and appropriate use of douchebag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC