Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sugar farmers sue over 'corn sugar' campaign

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 06:49 PM
Original message
Sugar farmers sue over 'corn sugar' campaign
Thursday, April 28, 2011, 5:27 PM

PORTLAND, Ore. -- The sugar industry is seeking some sweet revenge. A group of sugar farmers and refiners have filed a lawsuit against several corn processors and their lobbying group for their effort to rebrand high-fructose corn syrup as "corn sugar".

The Western Sugar Cooperative, Michigan Sugar Co. and C&H Sugar Company Inc. are asking the U.S. District Court in Los Angeles to end the corn industry campaign that markets high-fructose corn syrup as a natural product that is equivalent to sugar.

They say the campaign constitutes false advertising and are seeking compensation for lost profits and corrective advertising. The corn industry say the case has no merit.

The lawsuit is part of larger debate surrounding the sweetener among consumers, regulators and the food industry.

More: http://www.cleveland.com/business/index.ssf/2011/04/sugar_farmers_sue_over_corn_su.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. GOOD. I hate those ads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TK421 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. They really DO take us all for a bunch of fucking fools, don't they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. well....................(look at our country...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is really pretty darned interesting. Did anyone post the NYTimes article about Toxic Sugar?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohbill Donating Member (30 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Sugar is sugar.
I read that.

Is Sugar Toxic? - NYTimes.com

As far as the corn industry says, sugar is sugar, no matter the form — and no matter the form, too much is deadly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. No, it's not.
HFCS has to be processed by your liver where as real sugar can be processed by any cell in your body. Sorry I don't have the links handy but I posted about this in another thread a week or two ago.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=439&topic_id=890637&mesg_id=905554


In the current study, Chi-Tang Ho, Ph.D., conducted chemical tests among 11 different carbonated soft drinks containing HFCS. He found “astonishingly high” levels of reactive carbonyls in those beverages. These undesirable and highly-reactive compounds associated with “unbound” fructose and glucose molecules are believed to cause tissue damage, says Ho, a professor of food science at Rutgers University in New Brunswick, N.J. By contrast, reactive carbonyls are not present in table sugar, whose fructose and glucose components are “bound” and chemically stable, the researcher notes.

<snip>

The processing industry argues that fructose is just another form of sugar and does no more damage than sugar. However, High Fructose Corn Syrup is an extremely refined version of the fructose naturally occurring in nature. High-fructose corn syrup is produced by processing corn starch to yield glucose, and then processing the glucose to produce a high percentage of fructose. Three different enzymes, two of which have been genetically modified, are needed to break down cornstarch, which is composed of chains of glucose molecules of almost infinite length, into the simple sugars glucose and fructose.

<snip>

The researchers wanted to know whether it was the fructose or the glucose moiety that was causing the problems. So they repeated their studies with two groups of rats, one given high amounts of glucose and one given high amounts of fructose. The glucose group was unaffected but the fructose group had disastrous results. The male rats did not reach adulthood. They had anemia, high cholesterol and heart hypertrophy--that means that their hearts enlarged until they exploded. They also had delayed testicular development. Dr. Field explains that fructose in combination with copper deficiency in the growing animal interferes with collagen production. In a nutshell, the little bodies of the rats just fell apart. The females were not so affected, but they were unable to produce live young.

“The medical profession thinks fructose is better for diabetics than sugar,” says Dr. Field, “but every cell in the body can metabolize glucose. However, all fructose must be metabolized in the liver. The livers of the rats on the high fructose diet looked like the livers of alcoholics, plugged with fat and cirrhotic.”

http://www.finalcall.com/artman/publish/article_3934.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. They refered to it as "liquid sugar" on the Food Network show "Unwrapped".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. maybe we can tag this a real "Food Fight"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PVnRT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. Ummm....wouldn't that be called "caramel"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enki23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. they aren't allowed to call it what it actually is?
yay. go cane/beet industry. kick the crap out of the corn industry. rah. rah. rah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Are you serious?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enki23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. yes. and i'm not stupid.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Wow! I'm glad you informed me you are not stupid.
Your capitalization skills were confusing me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enki23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. the emphasis was on the the first part of the sentence.
Edited on Sun May-01-11 09:38 AM by enki23
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. They aren't doing that. It's not the same as sugar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
9. sorry, the name "corn sugar" is already taken
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrScorpio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
11. Go Cane sugar!
Get those evil, lying"corn sugar" sons of bitches
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomm2thumbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
12. Refiner's Assoc vids getting swamped with neg's

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fyj2N-AspqU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k5TkstcgLYQ

comments are also correcting them - sounds like their campaign is only making them look worse

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spinny Liberal Donating Member (120 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
13. Good for them!
HFCS is some serious crap. Don't they get that having an ad pushing the crap makes people question it even more? It's already been shown that the stuff doesn't alert your body that it's full. Which makes you consume more product. Yuck! That stuff should be gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
17. Like the dairy industry wanting to change the name of soy milk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GKirk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Except the fact that the dairy
industry waited too long to complain about soy milk I would say they are right.

"Milk comes out of a teat not a bean."

Maybe they might want to use that for an ad campaign. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
20. HFCS is garbage food
I side with sugar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
22. I bought a cone of piloncillo today
I'm going to try to use it in place of sugar, of which I consume very little.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panela
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC