Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bradley Manning no longer held in solitary confinement, Pentagon says

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 07:45 PM
Original message
Bradley Manning no longer held in solitary confinement, Pentagon says
Edited on Thu Apr-28-11 08:37 PM by cal04
Soldier now detained among medium-security inmates at Fort Leavenworth in Kansas as he awaits court martial
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/apr/29/bradley-manning-solitary-confinement-pentagon

Bradley Manning, the US soldier accused of leaking classified cables to WikiLeaks, is no longer being held in solitary confinement and is now being allowed to move among other military prisoners, according to the Pentagon.

Reporters were allowed to view the kind of accommodation in which Manning is currently being detained, at Fort Leavenworth in Kansas, after he was moved earlier this month from Quantico marine base in Virginia as he awaits court martial.

His treatment in Virginia– which included 23 hours in his cell and being stripped down to a smock at night – was widely condemned by human rights groups including Amnesty International and the UN rapporteur on torture, who subsquently launched an investigation into conditions.

Manning is now detained among other medium-security inmates also awaiting military trial, according to Associated Press, which took part in a media tour of his new accommodation. The move implies that Manning has been cleared as a suicide risk, as any detainee deemed a risk of suicide would be held on their own.


WikiLeaks suspect to be housed with other inmates
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_wikileaks_army_private_tour
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Means public pressure was great enough to move him and quit
working him over. Even the UN Rapporteur was denied access to him earlier to examine his condition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. +1. That's *exactly* what it means. (IF it's true.)
Edited on Thu Apr-28-11 08:29 PM by Smarmie Doofus
It mean the hard work done by thousands of activists around the country and OUTSIDE of it... even in the face of a relentless disinformation campaign orchestrated by the state .... can have a decisive impact.

Let's keep pushing.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonperson Donating Member (901 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. "Cleared as a suicide risk?"
Or broken?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. This is from some notes I took from David House at a Firedoglake
Edited on Thu Apr-28-11 08:16 PM by mmonk
webinar conference: Manning seemed ok when he first started visiting. Later, his behavior was changing- harder with social and physical skills-seemed sick and exhausted. Bradley later seemed like he had been asleep for 16 hrs. However if he fell asleep during the day, he was forced to stay awake.

It wasn't until a February visit he seemed better and had had vistors. In March, House was taken off the visitors list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 05:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC