Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House threatens retaliation against SF Chronicle for posting protest video

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 11:16 PM
Original message
White House threatens retaliation against SF Chronicle for posting protest video
Edited on Thu Apr-28-11 11:16 PM by Newsjock
Source: San Francisco Chronicle

The White House threatened Thursday to exclude the San Francisco Chronicle from pooled coverage of its events in the Bay Area after the paper posted a video of a protest at a San Francisco fundraiser for President Obama last week, Chronicle Editor Ward Bushee said. White House guidelines governing press coverage of such events are too restrictive, Bushee said, and the newspaper was within its rights to film the protest and post the video.

The White House press office would not speak on the record about the issue.

Chronicle senior political reporter Carla Marinucci was invited by the White House to cover the Obama fundraiser on April 21 on the condition that she send her written report to the White House to distribute to other reporters who did not attend. Such "pool reports" are routinely used for press coverage at White House events that are not open to the entire press corps.

... As part of a "print-only pool," Marinucci was limited by White House guidelines to provide a print-only report, but Marinucci also took a video of the protest, which she posted in her written story on the online edition of The Chronicle at SFGate.com and on its politics blog after she sent her written pool report.

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/04/28/MNA51J994T.DTL&tsp=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is Bush still President?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Yes, a Bush who throws voter-dogs a soup bone every now and then.
Personally, I think it's crueler. I prefer real enemies to phony friends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. ............
:shrug:


:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wow! Just like the Nixon/Bush White Houses would do!
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whirlygigspin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. more sunlight needed as disinfectant
Edited on Thu Apr-28-11 11:47 PM by whirlygigspin
"At the St. Regis event, a group of protesters
who paid collectively $76,000 to attend interrupted Obama with a song complaining about the administration's treatment of Pfc. Bradley Manning, the soldier who allegedly leaked U.S. classified documents to the WikiLeaks website."

$76,000

Hey Mr. President, they just gave you $76,000--let them sing their song!

2manysecrets
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. If you had any doubts left by now...........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 01:46 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. No doubts left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
6. If only he played hardball with Republicans.
Edited on Fri Apr-29-11 12:02 AM by FLAprogressive
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
8. Waiting for the apologists....
Clinton was never this bad. Whatever happened to answering to your critics (especially ones that paid a lot of $$$ to voice their concerns)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dreamnightwind Donating Member (863 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
9. So the WH DOES know how to play hardball
Why is it always against progressive interests when they play hardball? Anyone can punch a hippie, it takes a real man to take on a corporation. Cowards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
10. That's really stupid. The Chronicle usually supports national Democrats.
Conservative on local stuff, with the Democrats on national stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. The only people this administration screws over are interests that support Democrats.
They're like spouse abusers who know that the spouse they beat up is coming back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PufPuf23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
12. This is pathetic on part of the WH. Shameful. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 01:43 AM
Response to Original message
13. Does this present a First Amendment issue?
The newspaper was exercising its right, and the White House retaliated by denying a privilege. I'm asking a question about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. No
There is no "right" to be a pool reporter or for the press to be admitted to private events.

That said, this is about as dumb as it gets
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demwing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 02:21 AM
Response to Original message
15. you know what they say..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
17. Wow! Recommend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AsahinaKimi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
18. This is just nuts...
Its not like as if the SF Chronicle is some RIGHT WING RAG...wtf is their problem?? No free speech anymore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC