Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anti collective bargaining bill may be inserted back into WI budget next week.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
iwishiwas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 08:06 AM
Original message
Anti collective bargaining bill may be inserted back into WI budget next week.




The majority leaders--Walker's poodles-the Fitzgerald's will do anything to get this law passed once and for all.
At one point it seemed they-the Repugs would wait until the courts decide.
Darling, a state Senator (Repug) who is up for recall says she will revote YES on it.
GOP eyes budget bill for anti-collective bargaining law



http://host.madison.com/ct/news/local/govt-and-politics/article_57a01758-71b3-11e0-a4b9-001cc4c002e0.html

GOP eyes budget bill for anti-collective bargaining law

JESSICA VANEGEREN| The Capital Times| jvanegeren@madison.com madison.com | (157) Comments | Posted: Thursday, April 28, 2011 1:45 pm

Get ready, protesters. The collective bargaining bill could soon be back before the Legislature.

Andrew Welhouse, a spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald, R-Juneau, said Thursday that while the "preferred avenue" for implementing the collective bargaining bill is still the state courts, there is a "possibility" the bill will be inserted into the 2011-2013 state budget.

"There is a possibility, and it has been informally discussed among Republican leadership, including the Joint Finance Committee co-chairs, that if the matter can't be fully decided on by the Supreme Court, then it will be inserted into the full budget," Welhouse told The Capital Times.

The legality of the bill, which would strip most collective bargaining rights from state employees, was challenged by Dane County District Attorney Ozanne Ismael on the grounds that a special conference committee violated the state's open meetings law when it approved the collective bargaining bill on March 9.

The lawmakers gave less than two hours notice before commencing the 6 p.m. hearing. State law requires 24.

Dane County Judge Maryann Sumi blocked the law from being implemented while the legal challenge is being hashed out. Putting the collective bargaining provisions in the budget would sidestep the open meetings issue, allowing the bill to become law when the budget passes.
......................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. But I thought it wasn't a "budget" issue
at least that's how they finally managed to slip it through (albeit illegally).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. The thing about Republicans-if they don't get their way
they will continue changing the rules until they get away with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yeah I know
I was just venting- rhetorically. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. Good time for them to pull something - when we're distracted by the recount
typical
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC