|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 11:30 AM Original message |
Will Kate Middleton actually receive the title "queen?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 11:32 AM Response to Original message |
1. I have no idea. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salvorhardin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 11:33 AM Response to Original message |
2. Prince Philip's full title is "King Consort" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hlthe2b (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 12:26 PM Response to Reply #2 |
43. NO... Queen Elisabeth has never conferred the title "King Consort" to Philip |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RandomThoughts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 11:34 AM Response to Original message |
3. What will the media tell you the title would be. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cronus Protagonist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 11:34 AM Response to Original message |
4. No, she will always be a princess |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 11:35 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. That's what I figured |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lydia Leftcoast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 11:44 AM Response to Reply #6 |
16. Nope, she will be queen, just as Queen Mother Elizabeth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cronus Protagonist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 12:02 PM Response to Reply #16 |
31. Naw, Charles will be King |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lydia Leftcoast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 12:19 PM Response to Reply #31 |
38. Unless Charles does an Edward VII and survives for only seven years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 12:22 PM Response to Reply #31 |
40. I thought Charles said he didn't want to be king anymore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 08:03 PM Response to Reply #31 |
65. Well, yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Misskittycat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 12:25 PM Response to Reply #16 |
41. Correct. The king's wife becomes queen, but a queen's husband remains prince consort. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 11:36 AM Response to Reply #4 |
9. Wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 11:52 AM Response to Reply #4 |
24. uh, no. that is not how it's done |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1monster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 12:14 PM Response to Reply #24 |
37. The Queen Mom, Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon, married Prince Albert in 1923. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YellowRubberDuckie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 09:30 PM Response to Reply #4 |
70. She's not a Princess.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
david13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 09:31 PM Response to Reply #4 |
71. No she will never be a princess. The definition of a princess is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salvorhardin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 11:34 AM Response to Original message |
5. self-delete duplicate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 11:35 AM Response to Original message |
7. Yes. She will be queen. Courtesy title. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demtenjeep (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 11:36 AM Response to Original message |
8. she will be queen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 11:45 AM Response to Reply #8 |
17. The Queen can't "pass over" Charles. The line of succession is pretty much |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 11:51 AM Response to Reply #17 |
21. I think the parliment can do it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 12:31 PM Response to Reply #21 |
46. I can't imagine them doing it. Divorce is hardly the huge taboo it used to be. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
david13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 09:32 PM Response to Reply #46 |
73. Parliament can do the pass over. And they may do it if Charles is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NV Whino (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 12:39 PM Response to Reply #17 |
50. Elizabeth can abdicate in favor of William |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Manifestor_of_Light (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 01:27 PM Response to Reply #17 |
59. They are both divorced. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 11:48 AM Response to Reply #8 |
19. Someone I know said that yesterday |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alphafemale (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 12:27 PM Response to Reply #19 |
44. I also think Charles can refuse it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Withywindle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 09:52 PM Response to Reply #44 |
80. I thought that too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dennis Donovan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 11:39 AM Response to Original message |
10. She will be Queen Catherine, Queen Consort, just like Elizabeth Bowles-Lyon... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 11:52 AM Response to Reply #10 |
23. So I guess they were right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellenfl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 11:40 AM Response to Original message |
11. i heard that wives become 'queens' but husbands are 'consorts' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GomezLives (256 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 11:43 AM Response to Reply #11 |
14. That is so sexist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 11:55 AM Response to Reply #14 |
26. It goes beyond sexism. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheBigotBasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 12:21 PM Response to Reply #26 |
39. It also means that if Charles dies before his mother, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 12:25 PM Response to Reply #39 |
42. That's incorrect. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheBigotBasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 12:57 PM Response to Reply #42 |
55. Sorry you are wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Generic Other (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 01:17 PM Response to Reply #55 |
58. Primogeniture says eldest sons follow in a direct line |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 08:06 PM Response to Reply #55 |
66. Nope. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dmr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 10:07 PM Response to Reply #55 |
81. No, you're wrong. Here's a link to royal succession: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dflprincess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 09:50 PM Response to Reply #39 |
79. George VI was only in his 50s when he died but Prince Phillip is 90 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
david13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 09:34 PM Response to Reply #14 |
74. Th whole thing is sexist. And a lot more. So throw that objection |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 11:47 AM Response to Reply #11 |
18. Actually, the reason for that is that the title of "King" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kingofalldems (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 11:40 AM Response to Original message |
12. If she becomes a Democrat I would consider it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dynasaw (664 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 12:35 PM Response to Reply #12 |
48. The Royals would actually Be Considered "liberal" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
david13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 09:35 PM Response to Reply #12 |
75. There are no democrats in England. Unless they're Yanks on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ikri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 11:42 AM Response to Original message |
13. I don't think so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jaysunb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 11:50 AM Response to Reply #13 |
20. wrong...see post # 16 for correct info. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GomezLives (256 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 11:43 AM Response to Original message |
15. It would be a drag if she didn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 11:52 AM Response to Original message |
22. Yes. She'll be the Queen consort and not Queen regnant, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
secondwind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 11:54 AM Response to Original message |
25. What I've heard is that her title will be "Princess Consort". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
secondwind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 11:55 AM Response to Reply #25 |
27. I just looked it up. The Dutchess (Kate) prefers Princess Consort. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moriah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 11:57 AM Response to Original message |
28. Queen Consort, not Queen Regnant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WolverineDG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 12:09 PM Response to Reply #28 |
33. Queen Elizabeth is not married |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moriah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 12:36 PM Response to Reply #33 |
49. Never saw him barking orders so I presumed he didn't exist. Hah! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PCIntern (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 01:34 PM Response to Reply #33 |
61. LOL!!! Post of the year!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hlthe2b (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 12:01 PM Response to Original message |
29. She'll be Queen Consort but never Queen Regnant (never reign) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 12:01 PM Response to Original message |
30. The monarchy will be abolished to save money. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
immoderate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 01:08 PM Response to Reply #30 |
57. Sure. Kill their biggest tourist attraction. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
secondwind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 12:06 PM Response to Original message |
32. Sorry, guys, I made a mistake. Kate will be known as Queen Consort, or Queen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Botany (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 12:09 PM Response to Original message |
34. Too early to tell a lot depends on how she does in .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WolverineDG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 12:12 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. and in the swimsuit competition nt/ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iggo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 12:34 PM Response to Reply #35 |
47. and in the compulsories. (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 12:12 PM Original message |
cyber burp. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 12:12 PM Response to Original message |
36. Prince Philip is not king because he married the Queen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
catchnrelease (359 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 12:43 PM Response to Reply #36 |
51. Camilla will legally be queen consort |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Misskittycat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 06:54 PM Response to Reply #51 |
63. It's on the Royal Family's website; "it is intended" that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iggo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 12:28 PM Response to Original message |
45. People will look at her and say 'There goes the Queen of England!' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cherish44 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
52. There's consorts and reagants |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
itsrobert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 12:45 PM Response to Original message |
53. Not if she dies or her husband dies before taking the throne |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 12:55 PM Response to Original message |
54. Noted they didn't make here "Princess" but rather "Duchess" -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cherish44 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 12:58 PM Response to Reply #54 |
56. She's technically "the Princess William" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Misskittycat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 07:03 PM Response to Reply #56 |
64. Same was true for Diana; she technically became Princess Charles, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 08:52 PM Response to Reply #56 |
68. Wills and Kate asked to be Prince/Princess ... so they were denied ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Manifestor_of_Light (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 01:36 PM Response to Reply #54 |
62. Yes they changed the succession rules. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 08:50 PM Response to Reply #62 |
67. Oops!! No. ... think they made a deal with Charles, didn't they .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Puregonzo1188 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 01:33 PM Response to Original message |
60. I was under the impression that a woman who marries the King is Queen, but a man who marries the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RagAss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 08:53 PM Response to Original message |
69. No...she will become a Rook ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
david13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 09:37 PM Response to Reply #69 |
76. Good one. But consider where chess comes from. She actually |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 09:32 PM Response to Original message |
72. She'll probably be divorced by the time such a situation would arise. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
david13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 09:39 PM Response to Reply #72 |
77. Unfortunately yes, if he's anything like his father. I sure hope not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 09:39 PM Response to Original message |
78. Queen Consort, I believe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:17 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC