Hannity is going to be indicted. (Just my opinion)

[Garion_55]

Last edited Tue Jul 3, 2018, 11:51 AM - Edit history (1)

I have no inside information, it's just a gut feeling, but I really believe that somewhere in those 1 million documents from the raid at Cohen's office is Hannity's name and I am guessing that asshole is up to his eyeballs in corruption with Cohen.

Between the campaign the Russians all that property Hannity bought, whatever else is going on with Cohen, i'm sure Hannity is involved.

I believe Hannity has been advising Trump since Trump started the birtherism thing. Whatever year that was since then Hannity I'm sure has been around involved in major decisions with Trump.

It's funny to me that no one is really talking about his involvement what Cohen knows about him, if that's the reason Hannity's been freaking out the last year he's afraid of himself going down.

What I love the most? Is not a word from Muller's office either confirming or denying anything not a peep for a year.

You can already see what that did to Trey Gowdy.

[CentralMass]

1. That would be nice.

[RVN VET71]

10. Certainly worth a celebratory drink.

[Stuart G]

2. Time will tell, and I hope you are correct...

[Vinca]

3. I was wondering if that might happen, too. Not necessarily for Russia, but it's very odd he

would use Cohen's "legal" services for an isolated event. It's probably something criminal or he paid off a mistress.

[Sherman A1]

5. That would be a nice scenario

Any indictment does give him much more fodder to play the victim of the big bad government 24/7 so I’m not sure that it will be a pleasant thing listening to the whining for a considerable period.

[wishstar]

4. Hannity was communicating with Wikileaks' Julian Assange too

[empedocles]

6. Conspiracy Law, can have a very 'broad' net.

Conspiracy, where multiple persons conspire to break the law, by unlawful means. [One proven crime, can bring in many who collaborate]. Key to many Watergate convictions.

[Tipperary]

7. Nice clickbait op. Be a bit better if you said "in my opinion" he will be indicted.

I hate seeing fake shit put up on du.

[Garion_55]

15. How is my opinion fake shit?

And I'm guessing it took you longer to reply to this post then it did for you to click on the post see that I immediately say it's my opinion and then to click back.

[Snotcicles]

17. It is cheesey ass click bait. IMO! nt

[Garion_55]

18. It is my opinion.

Jesus H Christ there is no need to shit on people's opinions. If you don't like what they're saying move the fuck on

[Tipperary]

19. Your op did not indicate it is your opinion.

You said that in the text. Your op is clickbait, but you already knew that.

[Garion_55]

21. The first line of the post clearly states that it is an opinion.

Do you people even understand what clickbait is? You do not appear to. Clickbait is getting someone to click on a link and then blasting them in the face with all kinds of ads and commercials instead of the article they were looking for. If you are lucky you get 10% of the article before you have to click another link to get to the rest at which point you are blasted again with more commercials.

People clicking on my post and reading my opinion does not benefit me financially at all. And it is also not a burden on you to sift through massive amounts of advertising to find out the information you were looking for.

Let us at least get the proper terminology correct

[cwydro]

23. You obviously wanted people to "click" on your OP.

People had no way of knowing it was your opinion unless they clicked.

That’s no doubt why they termed it clickbait.

I agree with them.

I guess you think you’re being clever.

[Garion_55]

25. Actually no I don't give a fuck if people click or not or read or not

For those who give a fuck feel free to read what I have to post. For those who don't feel free to move the fuck on. Nobody is forcing you to be here

[Achilleaze]

8. laundering ru$$ian dark money (R)

is so totally republican...and so totally anti-American.

[Tarc]

9. Jesus fucking christ, and your lead sentence is "I have no inside information", too.

These citation-free OpEds to lure eyeballs on the main page are a disgrace.

[bucolic_frolic]

12. +

[Garion_55]

16. Well duh. If I had factual information it would go on late breaking news.

Why would I stick something that Earth shattering on the general discussion forum? Not quite sure how that is a disgrace though.

[Tarc]

22. This thread is a travesty of non-importance and irrelevance

Coupled with a deceptive headline.

[cwydro]

24. Well said.

Trashing thread.

[Garion_55]

36. The headline is not deceptive. It is truly what I believe.

It is the opposite of deceptive.

[Tarc]

37. You do realize that the revision history of a post is visble, right?

https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=thread&address=100210822301&info=1#edits

You added the parenthetical nearly 7 hours later.

I think we're done here.

[Tipperary]

20. Yep.

[Ohioboy]

11. I also like how Mueller's office has kept things quiet.

To his opponents, not knowing exactly what Mueller has is driving them crazy. It's to the point where they think "not knowing" means there is nothing to know. More than once I've heard his critics declare "He must not have anything or it would have leaked by now". That's actually the reasoning of several pundits, Rush Limbaugh for one. They can't stand not knowing so they assume there is nothing to know. Such reasoning is totally illogical especially in light of the indictments and guilty pleas the investigation has already produced.

[left-of-center2012]

13. Got any 'gut feelings' on the next Powerball drawing?

I've read a number of these predictions threads over the past year,
but none have given us the winning numbers for Powerball.

[Tipperary]

14. I know, right?

I like to bookmark these ridiculous ops for future chuckles.

[ProudMNDemocrat]

26. Even I would celebrate a Hannity indictment......

That means you fuck over Karma, she gets you in the end.

[Brother Buzz]

27. But, but you can't indict a potential Supreme Court nominee

Stated to me for a fact. I only tell it as I got it. I am willing to believe it. I can believe any thing.

[dameatball]

28. I had the 1.5 seconds it took to read the OP and see where it said "no factual information."

However, I fail to see what misery it caused anyone to warrant ten more minutes of arguing about it. It's not that big a deal folks.

Without gossip and speculation, there wouldn't be nearly as much to read on this website. I still come here though and probably will continue that practice. Besides, I like to see a good Hannity bash anytime. Same thing as reading a dozen unfounded Trump tweets everyday. People jump all over those.

[Garion_55]

30. Thank you.

I guess I just assumed that since this is General discussion forum, it's not late breaking news, you don't have to provide any links, that people would just assume that everything on this forum is basically people's opinions.

I'm not trying to lure anyone in here for any nefarious purposes. I'm not trying to sell anything. I'm not trying to scam anyone. I'm just trying to engage in some good old-fashioned Hannity bashing.

[dameatball]

31. Things aren't going well. Easy for any of us to get testy now and then.

[Garion_55]

34. OMG I am so fucking frustrated right now

With the state of the country how the hell we got here and how the hell isn't Trump at 15% approval rating right now. I am just having a hard time understanding where my country is right now.

[Garion_55]

32. I went ahead and updated my title

I really am not trying to cause anyone to waste their time or expect something in this post that doesn't exist.

[The River]

33. Sad

isn't it?
I've been here since week #1. We used to have a fair number
of good writers. Most have moved on to other sites. Real info goes
nearly unnoticed while speculation, wishful thinking and gossip get 100 recs.

I mostly visit for the science news and the toon collections. Most of
my reading these days has an orange background.

[dameatball]

35. There is a lot of good stuff on here, but I only joined this year, so I don't know how it used to be

Heck, a lot of stuff is not even political. I need that too in these times. Agree on the science news.

[OliverQ]

29. Hope you're right, but not going to hold my breath.

And Hannity is guaranteed to get a pardon, so hope New York has charges on him too.