Trump's Lawyer: Videos Of Riot Too Divisive For Impeachment Trial

[turbinetree]

Politics 2/02/21 8:06 am Read time: 1 minute

David Schoen is trying his best to remove EVIDENCE from the impeachment trial.
By Frances Langum

First up, check out the chyron: "Unity-preaching Biden refuses to condemn post-presidency impeachment trial of Donald Trump."

Fox News admitting in prime time that Trump is post-presidency AND being impeached seems a troll from the chyron writer, but hey.

Tengrain mentioned yesterday, Trump's new impeachment attorney, and his bragging about being a great MOB lawyer.

https://crooksandliars.com/2021/02/trumps-lawyer-videos-riot-too-divisive

Hey David can I call you David, did you by some chance see the video of a Capitol Police Officer having his body drug down the steps, and just for the record Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick was killed, 140 others were injured, he, Brian Sicknick will be lying in honor at the very Capitol he was defending, and he will then be buried in Arlington, with military honors..........this is what those videos show and your "guy" and all of his enablers to the sedition and insurrection should be held accountable for his / there actions..............

[The Velveteen Ocelot]

1. But actual rioting isn't?

[PatSeg]

11. Exactly!

What does he think videos of violent rioting is? A Kumbaya moment?

So present your evidence, as long as there is nothing that would be too upsetting.

[Blue Owl]

2. That's the whole fucking point of this you stupid fuckstick lawyer

[Tracer]

3. TT: that wasn't Officer Sicknick being dragged, but another officer.

NT

[irisblue]

5. TT cyber shorthand for till tomorrow?

[lisa58]

4. Really? It's actually exactly what needs to be seen...

There is no defense to this crime

[C_U_L8R]

6. Tell it to the judge. We'll wait.

What a doofus.

[ProfessorGAC]

7. Don't Show The Jurors The Murder Weapon

Too prejudicial.
Basically what this straw grasper is saying.

[bdamomma]

8. what

the evidence and facts can't be seen or heard????? Go f off.

[sop]

9. The POS's attorneys claim the Senate cannot try someone who is no longer president, apparently

because the POS lost the election, while simultaneously arguing the election was rigged and their client actually won the election. Or something like that.

[Gothmog]

10. The facts scare them

We do not want the facts to influence this trial

[JustABozoOnThisBus]

12. They're right. The evidence is too damn evidentiary.

Or evidential.

Too damn something.

[pecosbob]

13. Your honor the video evidence of my client shooting the victim is prejudicial to his case