General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHortensis
(58,785 posts)Apparently chrisom was a baptismal cloth placed over the face, so stillborn and dying at or soon after birth?
Apparently a good year for "Bloody flux, scowring, and flux" Only 348.
NutmegYankee
(16,207 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)too much too soon. Thanks, Nutmeg.
Hugh_Lebowski
(33,643 posts)redwitch
(14,954 posts)This thread is destined to become a classic!
NutmegYankee
(16,207 posts)TexLaProgressive
(12,165 posts)For the definition, site wont let me copy and paste.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,088 posts)struggle4progress
(118,379 posts)"Teeth" may include dental abcesses
NutmegYankee
(16,207 posts)struggle4progress
(118,379 posts)Other conjectures include "hysteria," which (however) is typically not fatal (in its modern meaning)
The primitive state of seventeenth century medical diagnosis, theory, and treatment is well-illustrated by the fact that reported protocols for "rising of the lights" sometimes included feeding the patient lead shot or liquid mercury
The older meaning of "hysteria" is womb-related; and the conjecture that "rising of the lights" means "hysteria" suggests it may have been a women's ailment
The first person to compile systematic reports based on English death records was John Graunt, who sometimes used the combination "rising of the lights and mother" in his tabulations. The common causes of death associated with motherhood at that time would have included post-partum infections, hence my conjecture
tblue37
(65,552 posts)& she died of tetanus.
mcar
(42,476 posts)BlackSkimmer
(51,308 posts)No clue.
scipan
(2,368 posts)Like a stroke? Spinal injury?
NutmegYankee
(16,207 posts)Any very sudden severe illness or paralysis that was thought to result from the "influence" of a planet. Like how the moon (luna) was once thought to cause insanity (creating lunatics).
hatrack
(59,607 posts)Rising of the Lights
The disease Rising of the Lights was a standard entry on bills of mortality (published death statistics) in the 17th century. As any butcher would be able to tell you, lights is an old name for lungs. Many doctors believed that only vulgar people used the term to describe a tightening sensation in the chest, difficulty breathing and a cough.
In 1630, Sir William Vaughan, who promoted colonisation in Newfoundland, suggested a rather different treatment. He explained that the best cure was made by soaking the lungs of a fox in vinegar then drying them out in an oven, and then taking the resultant product in liquor. Sir William claimed that everyone knew that of all Creatures the Foxe hath the longest breath, and the strongest Winde. It therefore made sense that eating a foxs lungs would improve lung capacity and cure the disease.
EDIT
https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/arts-and-culture/books/horrid-coughs-and-sneezes-and-dead-diseases-1771852
Hugin
(33,228 posts)Sometimes, the loose garments of the times would get caught up in them and the poor victim would get hauled up with them never to be seen again until nightfall?
struggle4progress
(118,379 posts)BlackSkimmer
(51,308 posts)Hugin
(33,228 posts)Does "Kil'd by several accidents" mean those people were killed by one miscellaneous accident each or a series of several accidents such-as fell off a horse then trampled by a mob and finally fell into a well? You know, a really bad day like most of us have experienced.
Also, what in the heck is "King's Evil"? I certainly hope I've had the vaccine. I'll have to check my shot record.
ironflange
(7,781 posts)Tuberculous lymphadenitis (scrofula) was known as the king's evil in Europe, where the royal touch was believed to cure the disease until the 18th century.
Hugin
(33,228 posts)A rumor started by those aspiring to the throne to expose the current royalty to as much disease as possible, no doubt.
I must admit I thought at first it was a catch-all category for royal hunting accidents, coach collisions, and a few visits to the oubliette.
Shermann
(7,489 posts)I suspect cancer is underreported here.
Death by wolf does not sound good.
Hugin
(33,228 posts)until the 1980's.
Hugh_Lebowski
(33,643 posts)Corgigal
(9,291 posts)Didnt know its was a historical film.
Hugin
(33,228 posts)Funny how that works.
Corgigal
(9,291 posts)scary. No, actually scary and true.
Sneederbunk
(14,319 posts)Shermann
(7,489 posts)LeftInTX
(25,819 posts)This is late 19th century typeset....
FakeNoose
(32,917 posts)... however the information could still be true.
There's no reference to infection because they didn't know what it was in the 1600's. By the 1800's they did know about infection, but they didn't have antibiotics until just before World War II.
I'm thankful to be living in the times of modern medicine.
Mr.Bill
(24,376 posts)they knew more about medical matters than I would have guessed.
My historical knowledge is a bit weak when it comes to that era. In Catholic school, all history after the year zero sort of becomes religion class.