Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rittenhouse jury asking to watch video (Original Post) Beachnutt Nov 2021 OP
Judge isn't used to this kind of scrutiny. Sympthsical Nov 2021 #1
Said he hasn't had time to read defense motion Beachnutt Nov 2021 #2
I had the same thought Sympthsical Nov 2021 #4
I agree Beachnutt Nov 2021 #5
Interested. BlackSkimmer Nov 2021 #6
Good. Sounds like at least the jury is taking their jobs seriously. Salviati Nov 2021 #3

Sympthsical

(9,197 posts)
1. Judge isn't used to this kind of scrutiny.
Wed Nov 17, 2021, 01:20 PM
Nov 2021

He's certainly going on about the media. Which, hey, I agree with him on most of what he's saying. The media has been atrocious since this whole thing started. Still, time and place, guy. Stop reading the news. Saw a comment online that said, "This guy needs to sequester himself." LOL, true.

Seems like it's been a minute since the judge has had a video situation with a jury, so they're going to make sure everything they do is 100% the rules and legal.

Can't believe he hasn't read the motion for dismissal. There is some serious shit in there.

Beachnutt

(7,372 posts)
2. Said he hasn't had time to read defense motion
Wed Nov 17, 2021, 01:25 PM
Nov 2021

to dismiss therefore no ruling on it yet..
But he had time to read the wisconsin newspapers

Sympthsical

(9,197 posts)
4. I had the same thought
Wed Nov 17, 2021, 01:30 PM
Nov 2021

And it's bad, because the motion to dismiss cites the fact that the prosecution provided the defense with a much lower resolution video than they themselves possessed. And it's the drone footage the prosecution is hanging their provocation hats on, the one they've been arguing about all last week.

Both sides are supposed to have equal access to evidence. It's a serious question that needs addressing.

Now, if it's the drone footage the jury wants to see, it opens up all kinds of problems. If the judge had made his ruling on this instead pissing about doing whatever, then the jury seeing the video wouldn't be an issue. If they view it before the judge rules, it's going to be a mess.

Salviati

(6,009 posts)
3. Good. Sounds like at least the jury is taking their jobs seriously.
Wed Nov 17, 2021, 01:25 PM
Nov 2021

I know when I served on a jury a few years ago, we spent the entire first day reviewing the evidence, re-establishing a timeline of the events, and just going over everything. We didn't even have a vote on what we thought about a verdict until the second day of deliberation.

It was a pain, to be sure, the trial lasted 3.5 weeks, but it was restorative of my faith in my fellow citizen. We all took our job very seriously and wanted to do our best in our roles as jurors.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rittenhouse jury asking t...