Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,358 posts)
Sat Dec 3, 2022, 09:37 PM Dec 2022

The Jim Crow roots of why Georgia law is requiring Raphael Warnock to stand for election twice

On Saturday, PBS News dived deep into the history of how racist laws conceived in the Jim Crow era form the origin of the Georgia runoff system, which has required Democratic Sen. Rev. Raphael Warnock to stand for a second round of voting after narrowly edging out Trump-endorsed NFL veteran Herschel Walker in November by plurality.

"Since the 1960s, Georgia’s majority voting law has required a candidate get 50 percent of the vote or more in order to be declared the winner and was introduced by a staunch segregationist legislator named Denmark Groover," wrote Nicole Ellis and Rachel Liesendahl. "Even now, the law 'makes it more difficult for any group which forms a minority in the population to elect its candidates of choice,' regardless of the candidates’ ethnicity, historian and California Institute of Technology professor Morgan Kousser told the PBS NewsHour’s Nicole Ellis."

"When so-called 'white-only primary' elections were deemed unconstitutional in 1946, Black voter registration surged across the South, including in Georgia. In 1940, an estimated 250,000 Black southerners were registered to vote and that number rose to 775,000 by 1948, according to data from the National Park Service," said the report. "When Groover lost reelection to the Georgia House of Representatives in 1958 despite winning the majority of the white vote, data from segregated polling places in Macon revealed that Black voters contributed to the upset victory by his opponent, Kousser said. In his book, 'Colorblind Injustice: Minority Voting Rights and the Undoing of the Second Reconstruction,' Kousser writes that Groover’s opponent 'triumphed by garnering black ballots by a five-to-one margin.'"

Groover ultimately won re-election in 1963 — and immediately pushed the runoff system as a way of diluting Black voting power, which he referred to as the "Negro Voting Block," the report continued. The runoff system "forc[es] voters to choose between the two candidates with the most votes in a separate runoff election. Kousser explains that majority voting may seem innocuous, but if the vote is racially polarized, 'runoffs discriminate against Blacks because they are a minority of the voters.'"

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/the-jim-crow-roots-of-why-georgia-law-is-requiring-raphael-warnock-to-stand-for-election-twice/ar-AA14S0Vl

25 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Jim Crow roots of why Georgia law is requiring Raphael Warnock to stand for election twice (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Dec 2022 OP
As a Georgia voter, I like the 50% requirement. It keeps third party candidates from tilting ... dawg Dec 2022 #1
ranked-choice might work (n/t) MissMillie Dec 2022 #3
Guess the concept underlying the run-off legislation is a bit frustrated in this election, huh? no_hypocrisy Dec 2022 #2
Not really. W_HAMILTON Dec 2022 #5
I live in GA and every AA person I have talked to about Walker is disgusted by him and they CurtEastPoint Dec 2022 #6
K&R Solly Mack Dec 2022 #4
Twice? It's four times. This is second time twice. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2022 #7
Not really. SlimJimmy Dec 2022 #8
Huh? Explain pls. DUers seem to favorthe candidate with the most votes... brush Dec 2022 #11
Warnock wouldn't have lost Sgent Dec 2022 #13
Still not making sense. brush Dec 2022 #14
The one poster confused Warnock and Ossoff in the 2020 first round. DFW Dec 2022 #15
Warnock did lose in 2018. The Republican had more votes SlimJimmy Dec 2022 #17
I googled it. Warnock beat Loeffler in 2020 in a special election. brush Dec 2022 #20
Yes you are correct, it was Purdue and Ossoff SlimJimmy Dec 2022 #21
Note to GA: this kockeyed system needs to go. Tia UTUSN Dec 2022 #9
See reply #8, Be very careful what you wish for. SlimJimmy Dec 2022 #10
Since I barely get wishes, it's moot. UTUSN Dec 2022 #12
Be thankful it was in place in 2020 DFW Dec 2022 #16
Despite the history, there is everything right and nothing wrong with requiring a majority. Voltaire2 Dec 2022 #18
Thank you kcr Dec 2022 #19
The runoff system disallows third parties as spoilers in our state elections SlimJimmy Dec 2022 #22
How does a runoff system "disallow" spoilers? kcr Dec 2022 #23
Probably because the run offs only allow the two top vote getters to run. MichMan Dec 2022 #24
Spoilers, from either side, take votes away from the main candidates. SlimJimmy Dec 2022 #25

dawg

(10,624 posts)
1. As a Georgia voter, I like the 50% requirement. It keeps third party candidates from tilting ...
Sat Dec 3, 2022, 09:42 PM
Dec 2022

elections to the major party they differ from the most.

I just wish it was an instant runoff instead of a separate election.

W_HAMILTON

(7,876 posts)
5. Not really.
Sat Dec 3, 2022, 10:23 PM
Dec 2022

Racist Republicans ran an embarrassingly dumb black celebrity candidate from Texas thinking that it would fool enough black Georgia voters to vote for their party.

It did not and has not, but the underlying racist undertones most certainly are still there.

CurtEastPoint

(18,672 posts)
6. I live in GA and every AA person I have talked to about Walker is disgusted by him and they
Sat Dec 3, 2022, 10:34 PM
Dec 2022

voted for Warnock.

SlimJimmy

(3,183 posts)
8. Not really.
Sat Dec 3, 2022, 11:59 PM
Dec 2022

If the system was the way that most of DU seems to want it, Sen Warnock would have lost in the general election to the Republican since he had 50,000 more votes. Sen Warnock won in the runoff since the Republican didn't get to 50%

brush

(53,949 posts)
11. Huh? Explain pls. DUers seem to favorthe candidate with the most votes...
Sun Dec 4, 2022, 02:40 AM
Dec 2022

in the general being declared the winner without the bs, racist runoff system.

How do you figure Warnock would lose, especially since he's gotten the most votes three times already, and he's about to make it four times.

Take it to the bank.

Sgent

(5,857 posts)
13. Warnock wouldn't have lost
Sun Dec 4, 2022, 03:47 AM
Dec 2022

Ossif would have and we would have an R Senate for the last two years:

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/11/03/us/elections/results-georgia.html?action=click&pgtype=Article&state=default&module=styln-elections-2020&region=TOP_BANNER&context=election_recirc

Jungle primaries favor moderate politicians. I would be ok with ranked choice voting, but that has been attacked as too confusing.

DFW

(54,465 posts)
15. The one poster confused Warnock and Ossoff in the 2020 first round.
Sun Dec 4, 2022, 05:36 AM
Dec 2022

In the November 2020 election, Warnock got 32+% and Loeffler got 25+%. Since the runoff is only the top two, one of the two will win with over 50% unless both get exactly the same number of votes, and that just isn’t going to happen.

In the same November election, Jon Ossoff got 47.9% and the Republican incumbent got 49.7%. Because of the 50% law, a runoff was required here, too. This saved us, because during November and January, when the runoff was held, Trump’s antics and low Republican participation were just enough for Jon to get 50.6% in the runoff, and thus win the seat he would have otherwise lost in November. I think the combined IQ of the Georgia Senators went up by at least a third that day.

SlimJimmy

(3,183 posts)
17. Warnock did lose in 2018. The Republican had more votes
Sun Dec 4, 2022, 08:04 AM
Dec 2022

in the general election and would have won outright under the system you favor. But, because he didn't get 50%, it went to a runoff, and Warnock won.

brush

(53,949 posts)
20. I googled it. Warnock beat Loeffler in 2020 in a special election.
Sun Dec 4, 2022, 04:40 PM
Dec 2022

She was appointed by the Gov. when the sitting senator resigned in 2019 for health reasons. Warnock subsequently beat Loeffler in a special election in 2020 to finish the term of the senator who resigned.

So we were both wrong, neither Warnoci nor Loeffler ran in 2018, and Warnock has only had the most votes two times, not three. I expect him to beat Walker on Tuesday which will make him a three-time winner.

DFW

(54,465 posts)
16. Be thankful it was in place in 2020
Sun Dec 4, 2022, 05:47 AM
Dec 2022

Jon Ossoff got less votes than Perdue, the Republican incumbent Senator in the first round. Perdue got 49.7% as opposed to 47.9% for Jon Ossoff. Since Perdue didn’t make the 50% threshold, the runoff was mandatory under Georgia law.

During the two months between the November election and the runoff, people soured on the Republicans, and just enough of their voters stayed home so that Jon could get 50% of the votes cast, and become Georgia’s « other » Democratic senator.

Voltaire2

(13,234 posts)
18. Despite the history, there is everything right and nothing wrong with requiring a majority.
Sun Dec 4, 2022, 10:16 AM
Dec 2022

Physical runoffs, on the other hand, are silly. There are other simple mechanisms like Ranked Choice Voting that can resolve the election with one ballot.

kcr

(15,320 posts)
19. Thank you
Sun Dec 4, 2022, 12:47 PM
Dec 2022

The replies in this thread pointing out how we would have lost in past elections without Georgia's system are entirely missing the point. It isn't democracy if it's merely a game to see who's better than who at rigging it.

SlimJimmy

(3,183 posts)
22. The runoff system disallows third parties as spoilers in our state elections
Sun Dec 4, 2022, 07:32 PM
Dec 2022

I like the system, you can keep whatever system you have. Feel free to stay out of my state's politics.

kcr

(15,320 posts)
23. How does a runoff system "disallow" spoilers?
Mon Dec 5, 2022, 02:13 PM
Dec 2022

If anything, it allows them to wreak more havoc as they steal votes away from a main candidate and force the runoff to begin with. I think you may be confusing runoffs with ranked-choice voting.

MichMan

(12,000 posts)
24. Probably because the run offs only allow the two top vote getters to run.
Mon Dec 5, 2022, 08:00 PM
Dec 2022

Any third party candidates aren't in it. People that voted for them will have to choose between the top two instead.

SlimJimmy

(3,183 posts)
25. Spoilers, from either side, take votes away from the main candidates.
Mon Dec 5, 2022, 08:50 PM
Dec 2022

This is the very definition of a spoiler. If your candidate lost because votes were taken away by a third party, you'd be singing a different tune.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Jim Crow roots of why...