General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRussia Loses 24 Tanks in a Day As 100,000 Death Toll Nears: Ukraine
Russian forces in Ukraine lost another 24 tanks as of Sunday, according to the latest figures from Ukraine's armed forces, as the total alleged casualty figure for the nine-month old invasion neared 100,000 troops.
Per Ukraine's newest figures released on Monday morning, Russia has now lost 2,966 tanks since Moscow's troops crossed into Ukrainian territory on February 24.
Another 620 Russian troops were claimed killed by the Ukrainian armed forces, bringing the total to 94,760 since February 24. At the current rate of 300 to 400 deaths reported each day, Russia's military could reach the grim 100,000 milestone by Christmas Day. Ukrainian forces estimate Moscow has so far suffered some 284,280 injured and another 1,000 captured.
Monday's figures also included eight armored combat vehicles bringing the total to 5,928; four more vehicles and fuel tanks bringing the total to 4,544; one artillery system bringing the total to 1,929; four UAVs bringing the total to 1,617; and two items of special equipment bringing the total to 169.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/russia-loses-24-tanks-in-a-day-as-100-000-death-toll-nears-ukraine/ar-AA15bJna
Heckuva job Pooty Poot.
Kennah
(14,349 posts)getagrip_already
(14,923 posts)Or maybe the wizard behind the curtain?
sanatanadharma
(3,743 posts)All outer show with nothing of substance within.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(108,367 posts)Not a fan of Will's but he's right in this case.
Kaleva
(36,372 posts)ruet
(10,040 posts)They have stocks for miles. It's the loss of skilled, professional, crew that will take the heaviest toll.
Johnny2X2X
(19,240 posts)But Russia has lost maybe 1/6th of their total tanks, and a much larger % than that of their most advanced tanks. 1/6th is significant and diminishes Russia as a threat going forward.
ruet
(10,040 posts)I haven't seen the numbers as of late so I'm not sure about the percentage of the losses that were T-80s and 90s. I don't know why Russia would throw them at the Ukrainian ATGM grinder other than some bizzare flex.
EDIT: I'll have a look at https://www.oryxspioenkop.com/ when I get home form work.
EX500rider
(10,884 posts)So of course they lost the good stuff 1st, the T-62/64's were in mothballs at the time
Igel
(35,383 posts)"Let's not use the good stuff. That might provide too easy a victory. Nothing wins support like having our ass handed to us!"
Javaman
(62,534 posts)I'm reminded of the scene at the end of the Band of Brothers.
this will be the russian army in the end...
KentuckyWoman
(6,697 posts)Such pointless sacrifice.
Igel
(35,383 posts)But many are still rah-rah imperialist Russia!
Centuries ago--back in early March '22--I said that they need 75k dead Russian troops to maybe make a difference.
I said I'd obviously failed the prophet test when I'd said in 2016 there was no way Trump would win. Little did I learn, apparently.
Maybe at 250k dead, 700k wounded? Sure, but only if 100k of the dead are from Moscow and SP. The Russian hinterland is meat and potatoes--labor and food, and not much more.