General Discussion

brooklynite

(94,984 posts) Mon Dec 19, 2022, 03:14 PM Dec 2022

"We believe that the evidence described by my colleagues today..."

"We believe that the evidence described by my colleagues today and assembled throughout our hearings, warrants a criminal referral of former President Donald J. Trump, John Eastman and others for violation of this Statute"

18 USC Section 1512(c)

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"We believe that the evidence described by my colleagues today..." (Original Post) brooklynite Dec 2022 OP

Who are the others? Ocelot II Dec 2022 #1

I believe they're previously indicated Giuliani and Meadows. brooklynite Dec 2022 #2

I think others includes anyone in Congress that participated in the Seditious Conspiracy Bluethroughu Dec 2022 #4

Grass roots rebellion of patriotic insurrectionists indeed. bucolic_frolic Dec 2022 #3

Somewhat disappointed that the Committee did not name the Reps and Senators involved. Samrob Dec 2022 #5

Ocelot II

(115,987 posts)

1. Who are the others?

Reply to brooklynite (Original post)

Mon Dec 19, 2022, 03:15 PM

Dec 2022

brooklynite

(94,984 posts)

2. I believe they're previously indicated Giuliani and Meadows.

Reply to Ocelot II (Reply #1)

Mon Dec 19, 2022, 03:16 PM

Dec 2022

Bluethroughu

(5,206 posts)

4. I think others includes anyone in Congress that participated in the Seditious Conspiracy

Reply to Ocelot II (Reply #1)

Mon Dec 19, 2022, 03:23 PM

Dec 2022

To impede the peaceful transfer of power from the orange beast to the duly elected President Biden. They kept the report open to amendment to include any new information the DOJ is able to obtain from the members of Congress that ignored the summons.

bucolic_frolic

(43,499 posts)

3. Grass roots rebellion of patriotic insurrectionists indeed.

Reply to brooklynite (Original post)

Mon Dec 19, 2022, 03:21 PM

Dec 2022

Funny thing about how deeply and well thought out the U.S. Criminal Code. It does seem to have no place for the crooks to hide.

Samrob

(4,298 posts)

5. Somewhat disappointed that the Committee did not name the Reps and Senators involved.