Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

aquart

(69,014 posts)
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 02:34 PM Dec 2012

We have no ERA so no reason to treat men the same as women. Ban men from owning guns.

Last edited Fri Dec 14, 2012, 03:11 PM - Edit history (1)

If I can be protected from the horrid potential of Sudafed, I can be protected from the possibility that the nearest man will open fire.

We are completely unable to determine in advance which secretly unstable MALE is going to run off the rails so take the guns away from all of them.

Bloody enough.

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
We have no ERA so no reason to treat men the same as women. Ban men from owning guns. (Original Post) aquart Dec 2012 OP
I'm down with that. The legal definition of "militia" currently has gender preferences Recursion Dec 2012 #1
I can't argue with that. Gman Dec 2012 #2

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
1. I'm down with that. The legal definition of "militia" currently has gender preferences
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 02:36 PM
Dec 2012

So there's no particular reason we couldn't go the other way.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»We have no ERA so no reas...