General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat The Publishing Industry Does To Photographs Of Women
Before & After
The rest: http://www.buzzfeed.com/jessicamisener/17-mesmerizing-before-after-photoshop-gifs
MrSlayer
(22,143 posts)You try to make them look as attractive as possible. That's the gig.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)in that activity. Shit, I've touched up my own photos with a few moments in the 'shop before putting them online before -- if I could have them professionally worked over for maximum handsomification I'd be all for it!
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)Woo-hoo! The online dating services will never know what hit them!
That first date may be a bit problematic, however...
cliffordu
(30,994 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)And back atcha.
Happy Valentine's Day!
cliffordu
(30,994 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)...on Christian Mingle.
cliffordu
(30,994 posts)You ARE going to hell for THAT, ya know....
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)I get bonus points from Satan for every one I seduce. You should sign up--just look for Satan's Friends and Families plan.
cliffordu
(30,994 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)cliffordu
(30,994 posts)PAAARRRRRTAAAAYYYYYY!!!!!!!!!
joshcryer
(62,287 posts)She's 67 and wants to look good, so, yaknow, why not. It's a fun exercise.
People IRL know she doesn't look like the touch ups, so it's really more digital makeup.
(Note: I don't have the skills to change her size, just get rid of wrinkles and blemishes. So it really is like digital makeup and not comparable to some of the crazy crap going on in some of those edits.)
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)With my looks, I can hardly criticize those who want to "enhance" their appearance. Though, as someone who had facial injuries in VN, I must say that my docs did a great job on me. I have no complaints--I'm just happy to be here.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)It's not ME that's the problem. It's the fake images of perfection that we are brainwashed into thinking are real and therefore attainable.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)...of a poor Photoshopper.
Jolie looks like wax there, for instance.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)murielm99
(30,792 posts)I don't look so terrible after all!
Anyway, I have always believed that every age has its own beauty. I know women in their seventies who are gorgeous. Can they pass for twenty? No, and why would they want to?
onehandle
(51,122 posts)She loved the results.
I did not sand her down to plastic. Balanced the color. Whitened the teeth and eyeballs a tiny bit. Lightened the bags under her eyes. Reduced wrinkles, but did not eliminate them.
Beartracks
(12,847 posts)... what I think of not as "fixing" or "improving," but rather making the person appear more the way they do in real life. For example... I've fixed my spouse's photo the way you described, mainly to make her look the way I always see her. For example: "Bags under her eyes? She doesn't have bags under eyes!" (shop! shop!) "I never noticed those worry lines before... Those don't belong there!" (shop! shop! shop!)
Ever look at a photo and think, "so-and-so doesn't look like that in real life"? (Or, more often, "*I* don't look like that in real life!!!!" Yep - then that's what I'm talking about.
(OBVIOUSLY this kind of touch-up is not what the magazine photo editors are doing. They're altering way more than cosmetic appearances. And anyway, the cosmetic stuff they do change tends to remove nearly all character. Like you said: plastic.)
================
onehandle
(51,122 posts)Which is why I put improved in quotes.
Beartracks
(12,847 posts)==============
cilla4progress
(24,815 posts)no change to Angelina Jolie photo?
msongs
(67,513 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)kentauros
(29,414 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)Some...not so different. Just spiffied up and glamorized a bit. Thing is, most of them are beautiful to begin with.
I knew photos were photoshopped, but I've never seen the comparisons like that. Makes me feel better! I obviously look like a model. Just not without the photoshop.
MadHound
(34,179 posts)Erase wrinkles, tuck in hair, push around body parts. Hell, they even enhance guys' chests and abs. Why? Because it is the business of making people look super, fabulously wonderful, all the better to sell people stuff. It isn't sexist, it's capitalist.
Kablooie
(18,650 posts)Beartracks
(12,847 posts)DearHeart
(692 posts)MichaelHarris
(10,017 posts)and shoot models all the time. We try to deliver an appealing product, it's not journalism. When I shoot journalism I don't edit, when I shoot models I edit. It's simple really, most people don't want a photo with a big honking nose pimple.
Journalism shots:
Modeling:
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)jmowreader
(50,608 posts)And most of the fixes they made should have been made in the makeup room, not the computer - OMG they got rid of a weird lump of hair on someone's forehead!
Check out http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/06/oprahs-head-ann-margarets-body-a-brief-history-of-pre-photoshop-fakery/258369/# and you'll see that this is nothing new - there's even one of Abraham Lincoln's head pasted onto John Calhoun's body.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)progressoid
(50,035 posts)In a promo poster for upcoming ABC show The Taste ("about tasting and judging food without ever knowing who has cooked it or what ingredients have been used" , Nigella Lawson wouldn't let the ad team airbrush out her stomach.
She wrote on her blog:
"Although it was very thrilling to think of being up on a billboard in LA and around the States, I was very strict and English and told them they weren't allowed to airbrush my tummy out.
Wise? Hmmm. But that tum is the truth and is come by honestly, as my granny would have said."
http://www.buzzfeed.com/emofly/nigella-lawson-tells-abc-they-cant-airbush-out-he
cliffordu
(30,994 posts)She is one of the most beautiful women walking the planet.
If she wasn't happily married, I'd ask her out.
I love women who look like women.
KansDem
(28,498 posts)________
PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)personally I dislike Barbie girls. Paula Cole was pissed that they removed her armpit hair. personally can't recognize most of the photoshop folks above. especially the late Brittany Murphy. she always had those around her eyes so the photoshop looks like a drawing.. even in porn they do this both photoshop (and usually very poorly. ) Poor Sandra Shine had her beauty mark removed early last decade. And even now they sorta power her vagina . as with most girls. bit hard to powder that area if it's supposed to be wet.. and of course they all encourage big boobs otherwise they claim they are pretending to be underage. Which ALS Scan has been rather against implanted models. Which are fairly banned off that site. Surprised you didn't include the Jennifer Love Hewitt one where they actually shrank her boobs.. O_O
tblue
(16,350 posts)Oy vey! Even the women in those pictures don't look like those pictures.
Beartracks
(12,847 posts)And also: someone felt they needed to make Katy Perry *"larger"*?? That was a waste of Photoshop time!
========================
Isoldeblue
(1,135 posts)is lightening black skin, to look more white. To me that smacks of racism. Black is beautiful and white is too. But one is certainly not better than the other.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)This is one of our many American dysfunctions.
RedCappedBandit
(5,514 posts)I do not like how we are brushing this off as simple, harmless marketing technique, tough.
The way people are doctored to look perfect in television and print is undoubtedly a significant factor in the rise of body-image issues amongst our youth. We shouldn't be so focused on worshipping this fake, plastic look.
As if the fact that these photographers are 'innocently' trying to sell crap makes the issue okay. If you can't sell your crap without the aid of inhuman models, maybe it isn't crap worth buying.