Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsKrugman: Powerline At Cato
Powerline At Cato
Via Brad DeLong, I see that the Kochs are trying to take over Cato, which they view as insufficiently hackish.
They must have high standards in this regard; after all, Cato is, among other things, a place that had something called the Project on Social Security Privatization, which it renamed the Project on Social Security Choice when it turned out that privatization polled badly and tried to purge its records, to make it look as if they had never used the word privatization.
But what really struck me was that among the people the Kochs have tried to place on the board is John Hinderaker of Powerline. Hinderaker is best known for this:
But what I remember best is his sneering dismissal of any suggestion that there might be a housing bubble, or that falling home prices would do any economic damage.
- more -
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/03/05/powerline-at-cato/
Via Brad DeLong, I see that the Kochs are trying to take over Cato, which they view as insufficiently hackish.
They must have high standards in this regard; after all, Cato is, among other things, a place that had something called the Project on Social Security Privatization, which it renamed the Project on Social Security Choice when it turned out that privatization polled badly and tried to purge its records, to make it look as if they had never used the word privatization.
But what really struck me was that among the people the Kochs have tried to place on the board is John Hinderaker of Powerline. Hinderaker is best known for this:
It must be very strange to be President Bush. A man of extraordinary vision and brilliance approaching to genius, he cant get anyone to notice. He is like a great painter or musician who is ahead of his time, and who unveils one masterpiece after another to a reception that, when not bored, is hostile.
But what I remember best is his sneering dismissal of any suggestion that there might be a housing bubble, or that falling home prices would do any economic damage.
- more -
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/03/05/powerline-at-cato/
Now, that's extremely bizarre!
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1074 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Krugman: Powerline At Cato (Original Post)
ProSense
Mar 2012
OP
How do you make it from one day to the next with such a dearth of perceptivity?
bluedigger
Mar 2012
#3
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)1. I once worked for John Hinderaker.
Calling him a piece of human sewage is an insult to sewage everywhere.
rurallib
(62,471 posts)2. somehow, I missed the genius of W
I must lack a faculty to recognize genius.
are Santorum or Paul also geniuses (genii?) I am missing?
bluedigger
(17,088 posts)3. How do you make it from one day to the next with such a dearth of perceptivity?
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)4. Both parties want to move in this direction,
because both parties are purchased by the one percent.
The payroll tax cut threatens SS by tying it to the general fund, which is why Obama supports it. The Republican "cave" was nothing but collusion, and was predictable as hell.
Occupy.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)5. So
"Both parties want to move in this direction, because both parties are purchased by the one percent."
...both parties want to take over Cato and install a Bush tool as its head?
What the hell does your comment have to do with the OP?
Response to ProSense (Reply #5)
emulatorloo This message was self-deleted by its author.