Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Tue Mar 6, 2012, 11:11 AM Mar 2012

Krugman: Powerline At Cato

Powerline At Cato

Via Brad DeLong, I see that the Kochs are trying to take over Cato, which they view as insufficiently hackish.

They must have high standards in this regard; after all, Cato is, among other things, a place that had something called the Project on Social Security Privatization, which it renamed the Project on Social Security Choice when it turned out that “privatization” polled badly — and tried to purge its records, to make it look as if they had never used the word privatization.

But what really struck me was that among the people the Kochs have tried to place on the board is John Hinderaker of Powerline. Hinderaker is best known for this:

It must be very strange to be President Bush. A man of extraordinary vision and brilliance approaching to genius, he can’t get anyone to notice. He is like a great painter or musician who is ahead of his time, and who unveils one masterpiece after another to a reception that, when not bored, is hostile.

But what I remember best is his sneering dismissal of any suggestion that there might be a housing bubble, or that falling home prices would do any economic damage.

- more -

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/03/05/powerline-at-cato/

Now, that's extremely bizarre!

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Krugman: Powerline At Cato (Original Post) ProSense Mar 2012 OP
I once worked for John Hinderaker. hifiguy Mar 2012 #1
somehow, I missed the genius of W rurallib Mar 2012 #2
How do you make it from one day to the next with such a dearth of perceptivity? bluedigger Mar 2012 #3
Both parties want to move in this direction, woo me with science Mar 2012 #4
So ProSense Mar 2012 #5
This message was self-deleted by its author emulatorloo Mar 2012 #6
 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
1. I once worked for John Hinderaker.
Tue Mar 6, 2012, 11:15 AM
Mar 2012

Calling him a piece of human sewage is an insult to sewage everywhere.

rurallib

(62,471 posts)
2. somehow, I missed the genius of W
Tue Mar 6, 2012, 11:24 AM
Mar 2012

I must lack a faculty to recognize genius.
are Santorum or Paul also geniuses (genii?) I am missing?

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
4. Both parties want to move in this direction,
Tue Mar 6, 2012, 11:52 AM
Mar 2012

because both parties are purchased by the one percent.

The payroll tax cut threatens SS by tying it to the general fund, which is why Obama supports it. The Republican "cave" was nothing but collusion, and was predictable as hell.

Occupy.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
5. So
Tue Mar 6, 2012, 12:09 PM
Mar 2012

"Both parties want to move in this direction, because both parties are purchased by the one percent."

...both parties want to take over Cato and install a Bush tool as its head?

What the hell does your comment have to do with the OP?



Response to ProSense (Reply #5)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Krugman: Powerline At Cat...