General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe unacceptable excuse from the Sanford Police Department:Chief Bill Lee answers questions about in
Chief Bill Lee answers questions about investigation into shooting of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin
March 17 2012 at 1459 | 3182 views | 15 15 comments | 7 7 recommendations | email to a friend | print
On Feb. 26 Trayvon Martin, 17, of Miami, was returning to The Retreat at Twin Lakes when a neighborhood watch captain, George Zimmerman, 28, shot and killed him. Following an investigation, police determined that Zimmerman was acting in self-defense when the shooting occured. Chief Bill Lee took the time to answer key questions for The Sanford Herald about the investigation and why the Sanford Police Department has not released many details surrounding the case. SPD has since forwarded the case to the State Attorneys Office.
http://mysanfordherald.com/view/full_story/17920337/article-Chief-Bill-Lee-answers-questions-about-investigation-into-shooting-of-17-year-old-Trayvon-Martin?instance=home_news_2nd_left
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)Q why were the 911 tapes not initially released?
Honest Answer because they make the official story into a joke.
Ganja Ninja
(15,953 posts)The Sanford police department is incompetent starting from the top down.
Little Star
(17,055 posts)Yeah right, sure Chief Lee: "Zimmermans statement was that he had lost sight of Trayvon and was returning to his truck to meet the police officer when he says he was attacked by Trayvon."
The victim is the attacker and the attacker is the victim. WTF
CanonRay
(14,132 posts)that works. If the Sanford PD is incompetent, it's deliberate.
gkhouston
(21,642 posts)arthritisR_US
(7,300 posts)his girlfriend just before he was shot puts the lie to that assertion.
HipChick
(25,485 posts)ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)1) Scene evidence matched the Zimmerman's story
2) State Attorney supported not releasing the tapes earlier
3) Neighbood Watch status is irrelevant
4) 911 call taker does not have police authority
5) Comms problem with the victims representatives
6) Media does not have all the facts.
Each of those taken by themselves could be seen as reasonable. However they seem a little to glib and well practiced when viewed as a whole. Someone has clearly been doing their homework on preparation for...
Point 6 though is key. We clearly do not have all the details though they are slowly slipping out. Media attention has really helped keep this story alive, but there have also been contradictions.
My opinion is that this shooting was uncalled for and that Zimmerman's account will be found to be fraudulent, and he will be charged.
CanonRay
(14,132 posts)How many shots were fired? From what distance and how far apart in time. At what angle did they strike the victim....was he standing, was he prone, was he facing the shooter? Were there defensive wounds? Why were there multiple shots at all? Were the bullets recovered? I have about a million more.
To call what Sanford PD did an "investigaiton" is a joke.
frylock
(34,825 posts)why are witnesses stating that your officers attempted to coerce them into changing their accounts?
why wasn't zimmerman screened for drugs or alcohol while martin was?
UnrepentantLiberal
(11,700 posts)ieoeja
(9,748 posts)In real-life encounters police miss their intended target 70% of the time. A single shot kill suggests that the intended target was standing still wihle the killer took careful aim. Doesn't prove it. But goes with the odds.
And this jibes with witness accounts that Trey was pleading for his life before being shot.
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)The reality is that we will have no idea if those questions and others were addressed in the investigation until most likely the trial.
While some may argue without those answers it is inappropriate to reach a conclusion, it is still hard to see this as anything but a murder when looking at the totality of what has been released.
LynneSin
(95,337 posts)Seriously, was Martin going to pelt Zimmerman with skittles and spray him in the face with Arizona Ice Tea.
I understand Florida has this stupid "Stand Your Ground" law which basically gives a 'Get out of jail free' to anyone screaming SELF-DEFENSE. But to me, if you are going to scream self-defense you better have proof that the life you just ended had some sort of weapon on them. Had Martin been caring a gun or a switchblade then Zimmerman might have been able to claim 'self-defense'.
Clearly the child had no weapons and now we know Martin was also running AWAY from Zimmerman, another HUGE sign this is not self-defense.
But the moment that body showed there was no weapon on it a thorough investigation should be made to understand why an armed man would kill an unarmed child.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)A person can present a serious threat without a weapon.
Before I get dog-piled for "supporting" Zimmerman, let me say that I am not. His story doesn't add up. I think the shooting was unlawful and not protected by Florida's "Stand Your Ground" law. I think the Sanford PD did a half-assed investigation, and I hope the state attorney and grand jury figure out what really happened.
LynneSin
(95,337 posts)Doesn't mean that the police are perfect. But George Zimmerman's job was not a police officer and from what I've read he doesn't have any official neighborhood watch training. He was nothing more than a viligiant looking for an excuse to shoot his gun.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)In the abstract, not referring to the Zimmerman case at all:
An unarmed person can present a legitimate threat of great bodily injury or death. The fact that a person who attacks you is unarmed does not in any way alter the fact that you have a right to use a higher level of force to defend yourself.
LynneSin
(95,337 posts)A police officer would have been able to easily distinguish between being physically attacked by another person (whether armed or unarmed) and a boy just walking home from the local mini-market. 'Stand Your Ground' laws are way too vague and will create more George Zimmermans in this world. Is this what you envisioned for the United States?
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)...and someone attacking.
'Stand Your Ground' laws are way too vague and will create more George Zimmermans in this world. Is this what you envisioned for the United States?
I don't believe there is any way that George Zimmerman's actions will stand up to scrutiny even under Florida's rather liberal Stand Your Ground law. It's not a blanket immunity for anyone who simply claims that a deceased person was conducting some kind of attack. I think the Sanford PD has either deliberately turned the other cheek, or has misinterpreted what the law means with respect to this incident.
Stand Your Ground laws have been in place for many years. Properly applied, they're not really a radical extension of the protections that most states, including mine (California) give to people who defend themselves in their own homes.
LynneSin
(95,337 posts)Just curious
TheWraith
(24,331 posts)The only way this hasn't already ended in charges is that the local PD appear to be engaging in a coverup on Zimmerman's behalf.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)The US DoJ is getting involved because there is suspicion that Florida law enforcement and justice people aren't doing their jobs.
HTH
JI7
(89,283 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)Send bags of Skittles to the Sanford Chief of Police, demanding that George Zimmerman be brought to justice.
Chief, Bill Lee.
Sanford Police Station.
815 West 13th Street.
Sanford, Fl 32771.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12521542
fascisthunter
(29,381 posts)Could they be any more dorkish?
frylock
(34,825 posts)he is not registered with NW as their org has stated.