General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsZimmerman (and police) claim Trayvon attacked him
So what if he did?
Is it therefore legal and ok to harass and stalk an individual to provoke a response, possibly violent. Then to use that as an excuse to kill them?
aikoaiko
(34,186 posts)FWIW.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Oregon has long had relatively broad standards for when a person can use deadly force in self defense. However, it is also the case that a person who has been engaged in provocation of a conflict is not free from culpability should that conflict become violent. Basically, if you provoke a fight, then use deadly force to "defend yourself," you're probably going to be charged with murder, and very possibly first degree murder (since the provocation is likely to be viewed as premeditation).
IMO, Zimmerman gave up any right to be protected by Florida's SYG law because he initiated and sustained the conflict. If Martin did indeed start the physical violence, that changes nothing, as Zimmerman's behavior leading up to that point would have given Martin reasonable grounds to believe he was in danger (a belief which turned out to be tragically accurate).
obamanut2012
(26,183 posts)Brandishing is also a felony.
Life Long Dem
(8,582 posts)If he did, I would then look at who was crying for help, and if it was Trayvon, then I'd ask why Zimmerman felt threatened by a boy crying for help? So threatened by the boy that he needed to use deadly force?
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)and confrontation from a much larger man. a man with no authority that he did not know. he was doing nothing but walking home so there was no mindset there should be an issue.
i agree,
so what
freshwest
(53,661 posts)If the person on the other end of the cellphone's testimony is to be believed, Zimmerman reached for him and Martin was afraid for his own life. Thus anything after that was self-defense.
Zimmerman didn't have to get within swatting distance. If I had a vehicle and was afraid for myself, I'd stay inside it. That's common sense. This may have gotten lost in a testosterone induced haze by these two, but logic dictates that the man with a gun has the balance of power. Not only that, he had a vehicle, another empowering device.
Martin was like a deer in the headlights and even a deer will fight back if it is cornered. The balance of power, from beginning to end, was in Zimmerman's hands and nothing will erase that.
A person acting in self-defense does not go on the offense. Their claim is BS.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)If some dude kept following me in a car, and I ran to get away from him and then he exited his vehicle to chase me? I'd assume I was about to get robbed, raped, kidnapped or killed. You bet your ass I'd fight back with everything in me.
I see no reason why Trayvon shouldn't have responded the same.
The second Zimmerman exited his vehicle and pursued Trayvon, he became the aggressor.
Rex
(65,616 posts)"The second Zimmerman exited his vehicle and pursued Trayvon, he became the aggressor."
The police have a lot of questions to answer imo to the FBI.
aquart
(69,014 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)I also don't see any way to twist that to get offended that someone said he was. Well, RW news media might be, but that isn't anyone here, and we aren't arguing that at all.
Rex
(65,616 posts)That was strange.
EDIT - well maybe not strange if he missed your post above mine. NM.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Strange. I would figure you would ask them.
moriah
(8,311 posts)A private citizen doesn't have the right to detain me.
And the fact that the confrontation ended behind buildings suggests Zimmerman continued pursuit, along with the statements on the 911 call at the end of it that he wanted the police to call him when they got there -- indicating he *wasn't* planning on going back to his truck.
Johonny
(20,956 posts)applies equally to the two. You could argue either one was justified attacking the other because they were threaten. The law is pointless, dangerous and basically makes it so the only way to guarantee your safety is to shoot first. If you don't then the living guy gets to control the story to the police. I know enough information to know the law is terrible, pointless and harmful to society. Just as its opponents predicted when it was passed.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)otherwise on this "stand your ground" law, there is an absolute disadvantage NOT having a gun
moriah
(8,311 posts)Zimmerman, being the aggressor, should have none other either old or new law.
And nobody with a sound mine denies it. I'm 5'3" and weigh 115 on a good day. I don't have a husband, I don't have sons.
I have me.
Jim__
(14,095 posts)How could anybody question that?
auburngrad82
(5,029 posts)Zimmerman ran the kid down (according to Trayvon's girlfriend Trayvon ran from Zimmerman). Trayvon put up a fight when Zimmerman grabbed him. Zimmerman knocked Trayvon down (at least one witness said there was a guy on the ground screaming and then a gunshot and the screaming stopped). So you have a man who outweighs you by 100 pounds chasing you and he has a gun! I'd be terrified . I can't imagine what was going through Trayvon's mind. If I were Trayvon I would have taken a swing at the attacker, and that could explain why Zimmerman "had blood on his face". Then Zimmerman got pissed and killed the kid.
I hope they can figure this crap out. The police either dropped the ball on gathering evidence or covered it up. I'd like to see Zimmerman in prison, general population preferably. I don't think he'd like it there.
lacrew
(283 posts)First of all, Zimmerman is a flake. If you go to the link I posted on this thread, you can see his 911 history. He called 911 for potholes, kids playing in the street, garage door open, you name it. I'm amazed he was never admonished for calling 911, for non-emergency matters...but he did, and often.
However, Zimmerman's paranoia was validated, by a high incidence of burgulary in his area...reports on this are also on the link. Just two weeks prior, a neighbor had a screen removed, and things stolen. So, I can understand the backdrop - Zimmerman, zealot that he was, was somewhat justified in being concerned over new faces in the community.
Ok, so he's out and about, and he sees somebody he doesn't recognize. A normal person, if he genuinelyu felt he had spotted somebody up to no good, would call the police (not 911), and report it/ask if they would send a marked car through the area. Zimmerman's reaction - calling 911?!? - was not normal. And, if you listed to the 911 call, its clear he gets out of his vehicle, and follows Martin on foot. Again, not the actions of a typical person. He's a flake. That much is clear.
In the latter part of his 911 call, he states that he 'can't find' Martin...asks for the police to come. He never gives his location, and asks for the police to call him, when they get there - implying that he is still on the move, looking for Martin.
Then the call ends...and shortly after that, several 911 calls come in, describing 'wrestling', cries for help, and a gunshot. You can hear the cries, and the gunshot in the background.
So, somehow, the two had found each other, the fight happened, and Zimmerman ended it with a gunshot. Martin's girlfriend reported hearing hearng "What are you following me for" by Martin, and "What are you doing around here" from Zimmerman. So, it seems that neither party 'jumped' the other by complete surprise...they were having an argument.
I don't think we will ever know who started the actual physical fight. And there is some question as to who was losing the fight. Martin's father initially did not identify the voice crying for help as his son's...but later changed his statement. Zimmerman's initial statements to police were that he was the one crying for help. I tend to believe that it was Zimmerman crying for help...i.e., he was losing the fight. He was also given medical aid for being a little bloodied up...and there was wet grass on his back. I have seen no reports indicating whether or not Martin was bloodied up. The report did state that he was found face down...indicating he was either standing up, or on top of Zimmerman, when shot.
So, we have an over-active 911 junkie, who identifies a 'suspicious person', which can be forgiven, given the crime rate in his area...but then foolishly gets out of his vehicle and follows the person. They end up getting in an argument...then a fight...a fight he is probably losing. He pulls out a gun and kills the person.
Its a tragedy, and it certainly never had to happen. We know that Zimmerman created the bad situation, for sure. Sadly, we will never know exactly how it became a violent encounter. Oddly, my interpretation of the Stand Your Ground law is that Martin was legally justified in standing and fighting Zimmerman...where in most states, if he felt threatened with severe injury or death, he would be expected to run away. That's a slightly different angle on how SYG affects this case....because all indications are that Zimmerman was on the ground and unable to run, rendering SYG moot, as far as he is concerned.
Taking the emotion out of it, what would Zimmerman be charged with? Depending on how the building envelopes are granted in this community, possibly trespassing. Minor. Maybe some kind of manslaughter...but you've still got to give the jury something that contradicts Zimmerman's story. The only hole I can see is his statement that he got out of his truck to better read a street sign, and was jumped by Martin. That is unlikely, since he lived in the neighborhood (and I read the signs from inside my car personally)...and, per the girlfriend's statement, he actually spoke to Martin (not 'jumped'). Also, the 911 calls place this in a backyard, so just how far did he have to walk to read this street sign? So, that statement does not seem very credible...I don't know if its enough to get him convicted of anything though. I'll let the lawyers answer that one.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)Where he was safe. He also possessed a weapon. He outweighed Trayvon by 120 lbs. If Trayvon had been a woman that was terrified of being raped, would it change your views if Zimmerman pursued her to the point of getting out of his vehicle to chase her down?
Zimmerman was safe while in his truck, and held all of the cards. He decided to play Rambo, and ended up killing a young man. I'm sure he probably thinks it is an accident now, but it wasn't an accident by a long shot. He CHOSE to play neighborhood police, and showed exactly why civilians aren't qualified to take on the task of "neighborhood militia". Because they shoot first and ask questions later.
Moral to the story: If you act like a Law Enforcement official, you need to have the training, understanding and education of a Law Enforcement official, which Zimmerman did not. He appointed himself judge, jury and executioner for a young man carrying iced tea, skittles and the misfortune of wearing a hoodie in the area while visiting his father.
Anyone that doesn't see the degradation of law, order and human rights in that situation needs to sit down and let people that don't believe firearm training is the sole education of Law Enforcement officials do their work.
lacrew
(283 posts)"would it change your views"
All I did is try to piece together what happened, based on information available at this time.
I have no 'view' on the situation.
I'm skeptical you read the entire post, quite frankly.
I'm not defending Zimmerman. He's an idiot. But, I'm not going to project some pre-meditated malice on him either. None of the currently known facts support that.
I have a prediction. Its not necessarily what people want to hear, but its what I think will actually happen.
Zimmerman will get charged with some sort of endangerment or involuntary manslaughter (not murder), and sentenced to around 5 years in prison.
Martin's family will successfully sue Zimmerman, and the HOA. They will not sue the city.
Time will tell if I'm right.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)But I'm not going to tell you what they are.
I HAVE views, and I'm going to express them.
I still respect your right to be impartial in this situation.
And you are probably correct in your assessment. Sad all the way around.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)with the police. Don't know if he ever got back into it. But 13 minutes passed from the time of his call and the time Trayvon was pronounced dead, which seems to have been approx. 4 minutes after the shooting.
He should not have approached him at all. It's very doubtful, especially considering what his girlfriend said, that Trayvon was looking to confront him. He was trying to get away from him.
She reported hearing him say 'why are you following me'. That means that while Trayvon was on the phone, 'walking quickly' to try to get away from him, Zimmerman approached him. She says his head phones were knocked off and the call ended.
Her phone records should establish the time of the confrontation. That would tell us how long they were face to face before Trayvon was shot.
The police arrived 60 seconds after the shooting. It took about 3 to 4 minutes before he was pronounced dead. If all these times are correct, (I got them from the police reports) then it looks like a period of about 9 minutes elapsed between Zimmerman's call to the police and the shooting.
The tragic thing is if the police had arrived just one minute earlier, they could have stopped the shooting. Zimmerman knew they were on their way. There is simply no excuse at all for him having approached him and even if they were in a scuffle, knowing the police were on their way, absolutely no reason to shoot him.
Zimmerman call starts: 7:09:34
Zimmerman call ends: 7:14
First witness 911 call: 7:16:11
Deadly shot fired: 7:17:11
So the gap in time between when he hung up, and the fight started, is 2-3 minutes.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)he could not wait 5 minutes. I didn't realize the phone call was that long. Which means he knew they were on their way.
Looks like he never got back in his car.
lacrew
(283 posts)For what its worth....and there has been some question as to whether or not the police report was ammended later...but the 911 calls should be accurate.
http://sanfordfl.gov/investigation/trayvon_martin.html
mfcorey1
(11,001 posts)argument.
Bandit
(21,475 posts)out of him. It was his plan all evening after being all jacked up on sugar.. Skittles and Iced Tea....Damn Drugs anyway.. I wonder why they tested Martin for drugs but not Zimmerman anyway..
auburngrad82
(5,029 posts)by 100 pounds.
That must be what happened.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)X_Digger
(18,585 posts)It has a specific section that says you don't get to use this defense is you are the aggressor.
Lilyeye
(1,417 posts)the kid was worried and was wondering why Zimmerman was following him. Zimmerman approached him in a aggressive manner instead of saying "I am with the neighborhood watch...who are you?" That would have made a world of difference. If we can believe the GF (and I do because Zimmerman and the police haven't been shown to be trustworthy) than Trayvon was defending himself.
reality time
(1 post)After 11 recent burglaries, George Zimmerman noticed a kid who fit the description of someone casing a house, with similar characteristics to the suspected burglar. When noticing that Zimmerman had seen him, Martin began running. Zimmerman got into his vehicle to follow him and call the police in case a break in had already occured.
After searching to no avail, Zimmerman left the confines of his vehicle. Upon seeing Zimmerman Trayvon began assaulting him as Zimmerman was walking back to his vehicle. An eyewitness noticed Martin on top of Zimmerman smashing his head against the ground, punching him and Zimmerman yelling for help. He then called the police.
When he returned after hearing a loud sound he found Zimmerman still laying on the ground bleeding and Martin laying next to him deceased. The police found that Zimmerman had grass stains down his back and legs, a bloody nose and face, and blood streaming from a wound on the back of his head as well.
OKNancy
(41,832 posts)but only on right wing nut sites... proof from a reputable source would be expected.
Of course I doubt you will be able to post it... for various reasons
The Magistrate
(95,267 posts)I had sent a note to Mr. Skinner myself a few minutes ago when a jury fumbled the alert....
Lilyeye
(1,417 posts)I don't like accusing people of being trolls, but so many of these morons have under 10 post and joined yesterday or today. Too obvious.
OKNancy
(41,832 posts)the alert clearly enough. I did a google search and the only place where I found any reference to "eyewitness saw Martin was on top of him" was on right wing sites like Hannity. It's like some meme going around on the right-wing sites.
We discussed it in the MIRT forum and we agreed on the nuke.
renate
(13,776 posts)I wouldn't be surprised if he whacked himself in the face with his gun to make it look like there'd been a fight, and it'd have been easy enough to deliberately put grass stains on his clothes and to whack the back of his head on the pavement. (It's hard to imagine a scenario in which Trayvon wounded the back of Zimmerman's head without a weapon, so it must have been the pavement, either on purpose to try to cover his tracks or from falling backwards in a fight that, from the phone calls, I don't believe ever happened.)
Edited to say: My bad. I hadn't heard about the tape Mother Jones has (the 14-minute one), saying that there was a fight.
http://motherjones.com/politics/2012/03/what-happened-trayvon-martin-explained
itsrobert
(14,157 posts)I must have overlooked all that. Please provide a link.
WheelWalker
(8,958 posts)Bluerthanblue
(13,669 posts)were you there? Were you one of the investigating officers? Eye witnesses have said that Zimmerman was on top of Martin. Lets see pictures of Mr.Zimmermans injuries. Let's see results of his blood alcohol and drug tests. Let's allow HIM to have the trial he chose to deny a 17yr old whose 'crime' was to be walking while black and male, in this gated Florida 'community' where he was visiting relatives.
WTF?
If indeed Zimmerman acted within the law, why shouldn't a court of law prove that? Why shouldn't he have been investigated? Hell, even actual police officers are subject to investigation and not allowed to remain on active duty after a fatal shooting.
This case is a sad example of everything that is wrong with our materialistic, egocentric, bigoted, self-righteous society.
aquart
(69,014 posts)May your brief stay be a happy one.
MelissaB
(16,420 posts)Isn't that a shame?
Aerows
(39,961 posts)Followed him in his vehicle, where there was no bodily harm taking place. Asked him questions, and the 17 year old man was rightfully creeped out, because he didn't know if this dude was a sex offender. He ran.
Zimmerman exited the truck with a firearm and ran after the young boy. The young boy still doesn't know why the hell he is following him and is scared he's going to kidnap, rob, rape, or kill him.
Young boy fights back, and is shot.
I'm not sure how you spin that bullshit as being "justified".
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Are you available?
(No 911 tapes corroborates this even a little)
ecstatic
(32,786 posts)How ridiculous does that sound!?
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)They know the FBI gets involved, they are in trouble.